About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editor
Mike Hoefer

Editors
elwood
susanthe
William Tucker
The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Susan the Bruce
New Hampshire Labor News
Chaz Proulx: Right Wing Watch
Defending New Hampshire Public Education

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
NewsViewsBlues- Arnesen

Campaigns, Et Alia.
NH-Gov
- Jackie Cilley
- Maggie Hassan
NH-01
- Carol Shea-Porter
- Matthew Hancock
NH-02
- Ann McLane Kuster
NH-Senate
- D4: David Waters
- D9: Lee Nyquist
NH-Executive Council
- D2: Colin Van Ostern
- D4: Chris Pappas
- D5: Debora Pignatelli

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
Hold Fast
Institute For Policy Studies
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Minimum Wage Bill Is Spotlighted by House Democrats

by: TimothyHorrigan

Mon Feb 28, 2011 at 20:49:12 PM EST


HB 560 is not just my bill; in fact all I did was cosponsor it.  Mike Brunelle was the prime sponsor.  It would raise the basic minimum wage from $7.25 to $8.00 an hour.  Although the bill didn't come out and explicitly say so, it would also raise the minimum wage for tipped workers to $3.40/hr (i.e., 45% of the regular minimum wage.)

The Republicans were all against this.  They were especially concerned about the tourist attractions such as Santa's Village in the North Country which would supposedly be driven out of business.

TimothyHorrigan :: Minimum Wage Bill Is Spotlighted by House Democrats
The House Democratic Caucus featured this bill in a press release today:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                                 CONTACT: Eileen Kelly

February 28, 2011                                                                   603-271-2136

House Democrats Support New Hampshire Workers and Raising the Minimum Wage

Concord, NH - Tomorrow, March 1st, the House Labor, Industrial, and Rehabilitative Services Committee will vote on legislation that would benefit New Hampshire workers.  Two bills, relative to the minimum wage, could have a dramatic impact on struggling Granite State families and provide much needed relief to help them make ends meet.

The Democratic sponsored HB 560 would increase the minimum wage by $0.75 per hour.  Its Republican sponsored counterpart, HB133, would change state law to keep New Hampshire's minimum wage at the lowest level allowed by federal law.

"Finally, a committee will have a vote on two bills that directly affect New Hampshire's economy and people struggling to find jobs," said House Democratic Leader Terie Norelli.  "I am urging the Labor Committee members of both parties to pass HB560, raising wages for giving hard working New Hampshire citizens, and to vote against the regressive HB 133."

In 2007, a study conducted by the University of New Hampshire found that approximately 32,000 New Hampshire workers earned close to the minimum wage and about half of those citizens - 15,000 Granite Staters, had children.  Additionally, they found that two thirds of those workers were women, despite the fact that women make up less than half of the entire New Hampshire workforce.

"It is about time the House started passing legislation like HB 560, which will have a direct positive impact on families and local economies," continued Norelli.  "People earning minimum wage don't have a lot of disposable income.  Usually everything they earn goes right back into local communities, creating jobs and helping small businesses."

A New Hampshire resident working full time at the state minimum wage currently earns only slightly more than $15,000.00 per year, very close to the federal poverty level.  Most of their income is spent immediately and every dollar they spend circulates on average eight times in the local economy.

"Fundamentally, this legislation is about supporting local businesses and New Hampshire workers," said Representative Jeff Goley of Manchester, a former Chair of the Committee.  "All of New Hampshire's representatives should be supporting our friends and neighbors who are struggling, helping them get back on their feet."

"I will be voting to pass HB560 tomorrow, and I urge all my colleagues on the House Labor Committee who are concerned with creating jobs to do the same," added Goley.

#          #          #

 

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Just curious... (0.00 / 0)
What's the rationale behind $8.00/hr?

While there is certainly a lot of ideological division on such a heated issue as the minimum wage, I think this would still increase its odds of passing if it proposed a more modest increase, like $7.50/hr.

A small increase such as that makes it much harder for opponents to speak of drastic small business expense hikes or full-scale shut-downs, and it decreases the odds of that wage crossing the "equilibrium" threshold and causing unemployment (though I am agnostic on what affect the minimum wage really has on employment, this is still a common rebuke).

Also, as an empiricist of sorts, I tend to believe in baby-steps.  Makes it easier to judge effects.

Thoughts?

pragma supra ideo
http://carroll4nh.com/


Presumably, this legislation is not about the ease of gauging effects. (0.00 / 0)
Rather, it's about getting closer to a livable wage.  If all goods and services are to be paid for, people have to have enough money to pay for them.  
The exclusive use of property comes with the obligation to share and insure that one man's benefit does not deprive someone else.

[ Parent ]
Sure... (0.00 / 0)
But it is in the interest of all of us who share the desire for livable wages to, first, determine what means are effective in that regard.  Though I understand dire circumstances often call for dire responses - in which case I will be right there with you throwing my desire to "gauge effects" out the window - I do not believe $7.25 to $8.00 is going to save New Hampshire's poor from their poverty.  So we might as well increase it slowly and gain some useful knowledge out of it.

Also, I really just think (which was my main reason for posting) that $7.50 would be more likely to pass than $8.00.

pragma supra ideo
http://carroll4nh.com/


[ Parent ]
Sure... (0.00 / 0)
But it is in the interest of all of us who share the desire for livable wages to, first, determine what means are effective in that regard.  Though I understand dire circumstances often call for dire responses - in which case I will be right there with you throwing my desire to "gauge effects" out the window - I do not believe $7.25 to $8.00 is going to save New Hampshire's poor from their poverty.  So we might as well increase it slowly and gain some useful knowledge out of it.

Also, I really just think (which was my main reason for posting) that $7.50 would be more likely to pass than $8.00.

pragma supra ideo
http://carroll4nh.com/


[ Parent ]
Compromising someone else's welfare is basically immoral. n/t (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
why not $7.50? (0.00 / 0)
After inflation, $8.00/hr is just enough to bring workers back where they were 15 years ago.  $7.50/hr would have fallen short of even that modest goal.

Frankly, I believe that the pushback from the other side would have been the same if we had made it $7.50/hr or even $7.26/hr.  


sitting state rep: running for re-election in 2012.


[ Parent ]
Yes. (0.00 / 0)
I agree with you there.  Increasing the minimum wage is increasing the minimum wage, and you're likely, for ideological reasons, to meet mostly the same resistance no matter what.

If it were up to you, where you would have the minimum wage set?  And why?

pragma supra ideo
http://carroll4nh.com/


[ Parent ]
Isn't there another bill, HB133, (4.00 / 1)

that gets the state out of the minimum wage setting business altogether? It's sponsored by Free Stater Carol McGuire. That bill seems more consistent with the 'viva the free market, damn the consequences' spirit of this legislative session.

[ Parent ]
I don't... (0.00 / 0)
I don't know why this is a reply directed at me.  My guess is that you are implying that the actions of one Free Stater are indicative of mine?

I could be wrong but, if so, I would like to just say, for the record, that I think one bill, out of nowhere, indiscriminately eliminating the minimum wage, could prove very costly and irresponsible.

As I said above, I am an empiricist.  Whatever direction we decide as a State to move, regarding the minimum wage, I prefer baby steps when possible.  Political science is hardly a perfect science to begin with, and we don't need to help its imperfections with drastic policy shifts.

If you were not implying anything about me due to my being a Free Stater, than I apologize.

pragma supra ideo
http://carroll4nh.com/


[ Parent ]
the state doesn't end at Concord (0.00 / 0)
In Carroll County the wage scale has been the same for the last 25 years. During that 25 year time period, housing costs have skyrocketed (Carroll County has the highest number of homeless people per capita, and no homeless shelter), and  food, gas, energy, and utilities all cost considerably more than they did in 1986. The difference is now folks have 2-3 low wage jobs to try and stay afloat.

The free market is a fallacy. The lack of forward thinking in our state is a reality that we in the forgotten north live with every day. Most of the legislature isn't aware that there is a top half of the state, and they do not concern themselves with it.  Trade agreements helped destroy the manufacturing base in the north, and the Bush admin. finished the job.

Before some you start with "It's not gummint's job to create jobs" that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that gummint policy  has been destroying jobs here for decades. Whatchoo gonna do about it, oh, worshippers of the free market? Tell us to move?

But hey, that's okay. We'll apply for food stamps, and then the Teabaglicans can hint that we're criminals who must pee in cups if we are "on welfare."

The issues are more complex than the current legislature seems able to acknowledge, as they attempt to move and mire us firmly in the past.

 


You don't get it, do you? (4.00 / 1)
You damned people up north are no longer welcome, you are not rich enough.  Move on, and leave the beauty of your part of the state for the people who can afford summer homes up there.  Just as we middle class folks in the more southern parts need to move on and leave our towns to the rich folks who have escaped from horrid Taxachusetts and don't need schools.  
Their duly elected state reps say they are cutting spending to help us, but that's just the window-dressing for making sure we can't afford to live here anymore.  Just take a look at JillSH's diary and how the property tax is taking a bigger and bigger bite out of the middle class and a smaller and smaller bite out of the rich.  Just downshift a few more costs to the towns and voila!  Lots of cheap real estate for sale.

[ Parent ]

May 19th@ New England College!

Connect with BH
     
Powered by: SoapBlox