About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors
Dean Barker
Laura Clawson
Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Betsy Devine
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce

Politicos & Punditry
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
John DeJoie
Ann McLane Kuster
ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

"Principles"

by: Dean Barker

Thu May 21, 2009 at 05:31:13 AM EDT


My hope last night was that marriage equality could still be saved if the Governor and others stick to the intent of their statements and not get too literalist.

This is a very good sign in that direction, imo. Dorgan:

"Gov. Lynch articulated strong principles that he would need in any version of the bill in order for him to sign it," said spokesman Colin Manning. "While he will continue to talk with lawmakers, those principles must be maintained in any final version of the bill. . . . As he said last week, if the Legislature passes legislation that maintains his principles, he will sign it. And if they fail to do so, he will veto it."

...Senate President Sylvia Larsen indicated last night that the Senate will agree to a committee of conference, calling yesterday's vote "part of the normal process of passing significant legislation."

Note the double repetition of the word "principles." This tells me he is giving House and Senate room to work it out without getting too constricted by the exact text of his earlier wording.

In the meantime, I'm going to hold off on my personal feelings about the way this civil right has lurched and bounced around in my New Hampshire Democratic majority in the hope that my public servants can cast aside the politics and focus on getting this basic Democratic principle passed already.

Dean Barker :: "Principles"
Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
"Principles" | 2 comments
It is presumptuous of John Lynch to put his "principles" above (4.00 / 3)
those enshrined in the Constitution.  Governors are not elected to be secular moralists; they are elected to carry out the will of the people.

Strange that conservatives seem to believe that principles need to be constantly re-invented.

That said, ask yourself on what basis health care providers claim the right to restrict access to patients according to family relationships.  Isn't that going to be a sticking point in setting up a universal health care program--that the providers aren't going to be able to maintain irrational discriminatory policies?


Excellent Points, Dean... (4.00 / 2)
...the "principle" -- the core requirement of the language offered by Governor John Lynch -- is to be sure that there is clarification language in state statute to protect freedom and independence of religion.  He wants a clear balance in our state law.  

This shouldn't be about politics, or about positioning, or about the Governor, or about individual legislators being angry at anyone.  It's about a process, in this case a Committee of Conference of several House and Senate members, talking with one another to identify the way to provide the balance of marriage equality and freedom of religion so that everyone feels protected.

We have a lot of talent in the House and Senate, and many people who want this to work.  If those who read BlueHampshire.com remain positive about the process and continue to contact House members who have yet to support the bill, we can find the majority vote that we need next time.

So that there is no confusion about numbers, where we're at right now is that House Bill 436 has been passed by the House and Senate, but has not been formally sent to the Governor yet.  What is before us now is not an amendment to THAT bill.  In fact, HB 436 actually is quite flawless, and is a stand-alone bill ready for signature that John Lynch says he will sign if we are able to write a statute in another part of state law specifically dealing with freedom of religion.  That "new language" includes his "core principles," and is contained now in House Bill 73.  It is THAT bill, not HB 436 and marriage equality, that needs more work in the new Committee of Conference.

We can win this in two weeks, if we all stay focused.  


"Principles" | 2 comments

Is there something wrong with majority rules?
Connect with BH
     
Powered by: SoapBlox