About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editor
Mike Hoefer

Editors
elwood
susanthe
William Tucker
The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Susan the Bruce
New Hampshire Labor News
Chaz Proulx: Right Wing Watch
Defending New Hampshire Public Education

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
NewsViewsBlues- Arnesen

Campaigns, Et Alia.
NH-Gov
- Jackie Cilley
- Maggie Hassan
NH-01
- Carol Shea-Porter
- Matthew Hancock
NH-02
- Ann McLane Kuster
NH-Senate
- D4: David Waters
- D9: Lee Nyquist
NH-Executive Council
- D2: Colin Van Ostern
- D4: Chris Pappas
- D5: Debora Pignatelli

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
Hold Fast
Institute For Policy Studies
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Voters Like Leaders, Rahm

by: Dean Barker

Wed Sep 02, 2009 at 22:01:45 PM EDT


Is it any wonder Democrats are losing ground with independents, while at the same time the enthusiasm of our own base weakens?

The traditional media, preferring politics and process over policy, have done a terrible job explaining what health insurance reform is.  Few outside of the land of political junkies actually know what a public option is; fewer still know it's less expensive than not having one.

Harry Reid's senate discipline and leadership have been pitiful. And while I favor the President's idea to have this be a thing born from the legislative branch, there have been too many signals from the White House recently that they are willing to label passable weak tea "reform" and call it a day.

Do they not see that if they pass something that is not meaningful, it will not have a meaningful impact on the lives of ordinary Americans?

And if that happens, Americans will retreat into "All Politicians Are the Same" mode. Independents will be for the GOP's taking, and the Democratic base will feel, rightly, that they've been played.

The health insurance system in this country is an unqualified disaster.

Barack Obama and Democrats explicitly ran on fixing it.

Voters like leaders and strength and conviction and results.

Republicans understand this almost intuitively. Why Democrats have a harder time getting it is, in all sincerity, a very great mystery to me.

If at the end of the day, after all the theatre and vote engineering and face saving, a law emerges that Americans are required to purchase insurance from the same old murder-by-spreadsheet oligarchy, it will actually be a worse outcome than the status quo.

I, and the millions of other people that worked to propel Democrats into a supermajority in government, don't make money doing what we do.  Our time is valuable, and, at least in my case, I would much rather spent it among the worlds of nature and letters than in keeping an eye on the Villagers.

If sixty Senate Democrats, a huge House majority, and the President of the United States cannot pass meaningful health insurance reform, Rahm, no amount of checking off legislative achievements is going to help your boss and those down ticket of him in November 2010.

That this even needs to be spelled out amazes me, and yes, shames me.  

Dean Barker :: Voters Like Leaders, Rahm
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Right On... (4.00 / 3)
...Write On.

[I'm a former has-been House member and State Senator, but I keep "Rep." on my ID name for easy reference of previous posts.]

Why are you picking on Rahm? (0.00 / 0)
Rahm has the President addressing a joint session of Congress next week on health care reform.  He hasn't given up the fight -- he's driving it.

he's driving it alright (0.00 / 0)
driving it around the midterms...pushing the option out two years if the Insurance co.s don't get in line.wtf

Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience. ~ Mark Twain

[ Parent ]
If it has to go after 2010, that will give us a chance to remove (4.00 / 1)
the deadwood.  Given how long it's going to take just to enroll 47 million people, a delay in setting up Medicare Opt-In probably won't matter, if we get the right thing in the end.

I also agree that voters like leaders, especially Republican voters.  They want a good shepherd to follow.  Democrats, on the other hand, want an experienced, knowledgeable scout at the head of the caravan--someone who announces, "that way lie monsters and dragons."


[ Parent ]
Rahm, Axelrod - take your pick. (0.00 / 0)
I appreciate that the WH is taking a bigger role at this point.  That makes sense and I'm glad they're doing it.

It's all the chatter coming out yesterday that the political priority is getting something passed to look bi-partisan rather than getting something meaningful passed that will help ordinary Americans.

I am dumbfounded that they would think doing this would help them in mid-terms.


Social Media Director for Jackie Cilley for Governor. Follow her on Twitter & Facebook!


[ Parent ]
I hear ya (4.00 / 1)
. . . and don't disagree.  I just think we'll see a fiestier President next week before Congress.  Only time will tell.

[ Parent ]
I think the opposite (0.00 / 0)
We'll see a grand ideas speech, and he'll appeal to the GOP's sense of duty to country. The idea will be that they will be forced to get on board.

They will do the exact opposite and double down in opposition.

A smart legislator would anticipate this and be prepared to present the bill in the same spirit that the president will present it.

Do we have any smart legislators? Let me rephrase that: Do we have the leadership within the caucus to get this done? I think not.

Then pull back a step further: Where does that leave the president? In a position of having tried. If the bill fails or is lousy, he can take the (slightly) longer view, but Congress cannot.



[ Parent ]
DD says Po-tay-to; JimC sez Po-tah-to... (4.00 / 3)

twomey sez lets wait to see whats on the table before deciding if we are hungry.

"But, in the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope." Si se puede. Yes we can.  

[ Parent ]
I will stop speculating on politics (4.00 / 2)
when they pry my cold, dead hands from the keyboard.

[ Parent ]
I like Axelrod (0.00 / 0)
Rahm, not so much. I like the idea of him -- asskicker for our side -- but I feel like he kicks with his left foot, and as that perception has hardened over the years he's done nothing to deny it, so I think he at least finds the perception helpful. I do not.

Axelrod seems more like he gets it.


[ Parent ]
Amen. (0.00 / 0)
I'm one of the independents who helped to vote Obama into office and I'm quite happy to help vote him out of office if he blows the health care thing (and the gay rights thing, and the torture thing...)  And I'd be quite happy to vote Republican again if they were to present a solid alternative solution on health care.  (...instead of just shilling for the health insurance companies, so granted that's a long shot.  I will basically assume that I've been transported to a parallel universe if it happens.)

Good luck on that (0.00 / 0)
During the campaign, I compared GOP plans on healthcare.

It took about five minutes. The eventual nominee John McCain (and he was early frontrunner when I looked) said nothing. Not one word.


[ Parent ]
Yes... (0.00 / 0)
That's why I said "I will basically assume that I've been transported to a parallel universe if it happens."

But y'know, if it's missed during this round we could be talking 2022 or 2034  or something before there's a serious push for it again and I can certainly imagine the party identities having shifted enough at that point to get something out of them.  Especially if the Republican Party finally realizes that no one is ever going to believe that they're the "Party of Fiscal Responsibility" at this point.


[ Parent ]
Fear is So Powerful (0.00 / 0)
it seems to me that many of the 60 are afraid that if they appear to ram it through (as they should) the republican spin machine will pounce and shriek "You said there'd be bipartisanship!" They'd call it the Nuclear Option, one party rule, etc.

It's logical, and regrettable, that those up for re-election in 2010 would fear this.

But I agree: we won, let's act like we did!!
The wide majority voted for our agenda to become realized. Wimping out is not an option.

No'm Sayn?



May 19th@ New England College!

Connect with BH
     
Powered by: SoapBlox