About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors
Dean Barker
Laura Clawson
Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Betsy Devine
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce

Politicos & Punditry
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
John DeJoie
Ann McLane Kuster
ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

A GOP Filibuster of Health Care Reform is Unpossible

by: Dean Barker

Sun Nov 08, 2009 at 20:57:16 PM EST


Let me state this as plainly as I can.

If you've read this site during the many months that health care reform has been tossed around in Congress, you know I have not exactly been kind to our Congresscritters, particularly the Democratic ones, whom I feared were going to balk at the clear message the voters were sending in 2008.

All that changed for me last night.

This is the single most important piece of legislation coming from the Democratic party in decades.  It's not the best bill, but it's damn good. It is meaningful, identifiable change in how way Americans get and keep access to health care.  Whatever the faults of this bill, it is not incremental; it is transformational.  It is historic.

Last night's vote gave me the confirmation I needed to do everything I can to make sure Carol Shea-Porter gets re-elected, that NH-02's seat stays Democratic, and that Paul Hodes becomes our next US Senator.  I now have a justifiable and legitimate reason to go knocking on the doors of the Obama voters to say - you got the change you voted for, and now it's time to acknowledge those that brought that change to the President to sign into law.

(I'm not going to lie; had a bill without the public option passed the House, I would be feeling pretty ambivalent and unenthused about 2010 right now.)

Which leads me to health care reform's next step: the United States Senate.

There are less than 41 Republicans in the United States Senate.  A GOP filibuster of health care reform, therefore, is unpossible (as Atrios is wont to say).

Harry Reid, in my view, largely a failure as a leader, has nonetheless staked his claim for a bill with a public option.  So to a certain degree the heat is off of him for the moment.

Let me state this as plainly as I can.

Nelson and Bayh and Landrieu and the rest can prance and preen and vote against the repeatedly majority supported public plan all they want.  

We've got 51 votes, and I don't care how utterly out of touch they are.

But if non-Republican Senators fail to vote to have a vote, they are not Democrats either.  

Of course, there's also Holy Joe, who is threatening to filibuster.

Here's the thing to remember about Joe Lieberman: eight years ago he thought he was going to be one heartbeat away from the presidency.  This took his already abnormal ego and engorged it into something unrecognizable in human terms.

Right now Joe Lieberman would like to think he holds all the cards, because that's what gives Joe Lieberman the media oxygen he so cravenly desires at the expense of his principles.

I'm not really worried about Joe Lieberman.  He has no integrity, and therefore he can be pushed in the right direction by whatever series of favors he's after at the moment.  I'll let the Senate Comity Clubbers figure out the twisted world of Joe Lieberman's desires; I want no part of it.

But I do know this.  If Democratic Senators prevent a good bill with a public option from emerging from the senate, if they refuse an up or down vote on it - they deserve the Netroots' full attention.

If they prevent the most important piece of Democratic legislation in decades from coming to a vote, they deserve to lose their seats. They deserve our spending time and raising money for primary challengers, from however many states away.

I, as well as, I'm sure, many thousands of online activists around the country would relish this task.

Dean Barker :: A GOP Filibuster of Health Care Reform is Unpossible
Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I agree (4.00 / 1)
I was once told that the person with the power in any negotiation is the one who's willing to walk away. I think that's what Pelosi accomplished here: she was willing to deal with Democrats and do it without Republican support. That forced Stupak out of the closet of obstruction and made him deal (a deal some say makes little change, but I haven't fully absorbed it).

I see no good reason Harry Reid can't do the same.


Agreed. Of course, I happen to think that there should be (0.00 / 0)
multiple democratic candidates for any position in any election.  I mean, if we're really committed to choice............

That said, in the interest of educating ourselves a bit more about the elimination of the National Security Personnel System our Congresswoman helped to remove, here's a story from the Washington Post with more particulars.  The comment section also has some interesting information on how the system works, or doesn't.


There should be an viewer discretion alert flashed 20 seconds before Joementum appears on screen (4.00 / 4)

to protect the young and the weak of stomach. Having to watch him preen for the next few weeks is going to be difficult. (Although it was somewhat amusing to hear the Senator from Aetna talk about the 'principles' that compelled him to attempt to deny health care to millions).

"But, in the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope." Si se puede. Yes we can.  

Absolutely (0.00 / 0)
Speaker Pelosi, and her leadership team are to be praised for getting this legislation passed. As you said, it still has a treacherous path in front of it, but the Democrats did the right thing.

However, I have serious reservations with the public option as it is written into this bill. With negotiated rates, instead for Medicare plus five, and a very limited number of people who will be allowed to enter the exchanges, it will serve as little more than a market corrective rather than as a real competitor. It may or may not be effective but at a minimum it will not make things worse. My hope is that additional changes to make the public option stronger and a real competitor are made prior to the exchanges being put in place in the coming years.

And, yes, any member of the Democratic Caucus who votes against the party on a procedural vote should be primaried. It would also fall upon Reid and the leadership to enforce discipline on the members. Anyone who will not vote with the caucus on procedural votes should be stripped of any chairmanship or leadership position. This isn't just any ol' legislation.  

"What you need is sustained outrage...there's far too much unthinking respect given to authority." -- Molly Ivins  


Pelosi (0.00 / 0)
and the Democrats most certainly did not do the right thing. Pandering to the Catholic Bishops and other antichoice groups who are working to stifle the LEGAL rights of women is most certainly NOT the right thing to do.



[ Parent ]
Connect with BH
     
Powered by: SoapBlox