About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors
Dean Barker
Laura Clawson
Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe
William Tucker

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
Katrina Swett
Jennifer Daler

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Mitt Romney Terrified of YouTube

by: Dean Barker

Thu Jul 26, 2007 at 08:21:31 AM EDT


Manly Mitt is terrified of questions that don't come from the Elite Beltway Punditocracy:
Republican Mitt Romney isn't sure yet whether he'll participate in the CNN/YouTube.com Republican debate in September, but he's no fan of the format.

"I think the presidency ought to be held at a higher level than having to answer questions from a snowman," he said in an interview yesterday.

Hmm... now why do you think he might not be a fan of YouTube, I wonder?  Got anything to do with this?

And it looks like smiling and holding up a sign that compares a US Senator to the guy who killed 3000 innocent Americans isn't the only thing we should "lighten up" about. Mitt on the Manchester GOP Shoot-Em Up Derby:

He said he's flown F-16s and shot Uzis and an AK 47s, "and they're fun. But I don't think anyone is suggesting that these kinds of weapons are going to be in the public domain."

"It sounds to me like a novelty and a fundraising opportunity," Romney said. "We have to lighten up a bit as a society and not always be looking for 'gotcha.' "

If they're so much fun, Manly Mitt, if you're so fond of fighter jets and machine guns, why did you, like Shotgun Cheney, have other priorities during Vietnam? And why aren't you attending the event?  Perhaps because you are terrified of YouTube and its ability to send around the world video of you trying to fire an Uzi?

I think I might just vote ABM in the Republican primary this year: Anybody But Mitt.  I'm tired of cartoon presidents.

Evening Update:Man, that was fast. No wonder he's so scared of YouTube.  He's a YouTube magnet:

Dean Barker :: Mitt Romney Terrified of YouTube
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
The whole country is ready for YouTube.com. (0.00 / 0)
It really doesn't matter what Romney thinks.  What a dope.

Manly Mitt can fire an Uzi (4.00 / 1)
but only when he's hunting "small rodents."

It's time we steer by the stars, and not the lights of every passing ship

Manly Men (0.00 / 0)
I'm married to a manly man; Mitt Romney is no manly man!

Energy and persistence conquer all things.


Benjamin Franklin


 


Terrified of Snowmen Questions (0.00 / 0)
Could it be that a Snowman might ask a question like, "Mitt what are YOU going to do to keep me from MEllltttinnnnggg.....?"

It's all about control (0.00 / 0)
He's used to having it, and fears losing it.


Mitt the Knife (0.00 / 0)
Romney is the poster boy for political nastiness. He has ice water in his veins and he's not afraid to make up "facts" or to bear false witness. He is a kindred spirit with Rove when it comes to politics. It's about power and control. People are of very little concern to him, beyond being chattel for commerce.

America, Inc. baby. All this talk about "of the people, by the people and for the people" is just commie, pinko talk, I tells ya!

Not as smart as I think I am, but not as dumb as I look.


Ruling elite. (0.00 / 0)
First of all, the ruling elite should not have to demean themselves by answering to the hoi poloi. don'tcha know?

Secondly, that sign was actually more offensive than most commentators have pointed out because in refering to Chelsea's MOMA, the sign was actually making a subconscious reference to Hillary as Bill Clinton's wife.  Liberal Democrats may feel flattered to have had a President who empathized with African Americans to the point of being called the First Black President; that's not how racist whites perceive things.


Quick Note (0.00 / 0)
Further down in this article it claims that the Buckey campaign hasn't filed a report with the FEC.  We did file, and we contacted the paper, so I believe that a correction is coming.

Where do we go from here?


Commercializing the Presidency (0.00 / 0)
It is hard to find an area of our lives that hasn't been fouled by the stench of commercialization. The current mania, primarily among younger people, for trading privacy for publicity dimly reflects on their upbringing.  Younger people, today, don't seem to know where to draw the line between what is public and what is private. And this is a very real problem for Americans, especially those who place a premium on the right to privacy.  This one right, which so many of us merely assume to be a constitutional guarantee and therefore sacrosanct, in reality is neither: the right to privacy is a subjective and tenuous right, wholly dependant on the conduct of the citizenry. The conduct of our younger people, posting on the Internet everything from personal diaries to sex videos, invites our nation's courts to abandon this right and declare it waived enmasse.

I am against this practice for yet another reason:  Allowing a commercical venture, such as YouTube, to take a central role in our political process threatens, to constructively exclude the vast majority of Americans who do not make use of the Internet as some sort of cathartic billboard, both defines the extent and identifies the nature of the problem this creates.  Money decides who participates and who does not.

Where will this lead?  Can you not envision the birth of a new industry?  We will have professionally produced and scripted "questions" turning the whole process into a televised sham designed to attract the highest possible rating.

Mark my words . . . in the very near future, the "winner" of a given debate will not be determined by political pundits and journalists, but by the viewing audience, who will be encouraged to call in their votes while incurring charges for every call on their phone bills.

Do we really want our political system to become another "American Idol?"

I think not.


Yes! (0.00 / 0)
Mark my words . . . in the very near future, the "winner" of a given debate will not be determined by political pundits and journalists, but by the viewing audience, who will be encouraged to call in their votes while incurring charges for every call on their phone bills.

I would gladly pay for a call to cast my vote for a debate winner if it could remove the filter of the Very Serious Pundits and Journalists who are quick to declare to the public who the frontrunners are and the winners of debate.

One thousand times yes!

I will pay to see ordinary people asking questions over Wolf Blitzer any day of the week.

birch, finch, beech


[ Parent ]

Connect with BH
     
Powered by: SoapBlox