About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors
Dean Barker
Laura Clawson
Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe
William Tucker

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
Katrina Swett
Jennifer Daler

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

California Electoral College Threat is Bogus

by: elwood

Sat Aug 11, 2007 at 10:08:58 AM EDT


Kathy Sullivan alerted us a couple of weeks ago to the GOP-sponsored initiative in California to allocate its Electoral College votes by Congressional district, rather than "winner take all."

The New Yorker wrote about the effort. Maine and Nebraska (and no other states) have used this method for decades; Colorado considered it in a ballot initiative in 2004. If California adopted "proportional" EC voting, it would (based on historical voting patterns) give the GOP another 20 votes or so.

But the initiative cannot work.

elwood :: California Electoral College Threat is Bogus
Thanks to DCDemocrat of DailyKos for pointing this out. Article II, Section 1 of the US Constitution states:

Each state shall appoint, in such manner as the Legislature, thereof may direct, a number of electors, equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or person holding an office of trust or profit under the United States, shall be appointed an elector.

California can use its absurd initiative process all it wants for state matters -- but it cannot use it to take power away from its elected legislature that was given to it by the federal Constitution.

Two caveats: a) I Am Not A Lawyer; and b) the current SCOTUS just might ignore the clear words of the Constitution if it helps the GOP.

Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I front-paged this by accident (0.00 / 0)
but I'll leave it here unless folks object:

  • It's a pretty important topic, and
  • It's way cool that an occasional blogger catches a well-funded Republican initiative in a fundamental error, and the MSM in a half-baked story.


Thats a very good point. (0.00 / 0)
However.

Couldn't the GOP argue that the legislature gave legislating powers to the public by starting their wacko initiative process?  Therefore the legislature did make the change?

And, of course, you all know that I'm not a lawyer.


[ Parent ]
That seems like (0.00 / 0)
an "unConstitutional delegation of authority."

The impermissability of that sort of delegation is what killed the line-item veto.


[ Parent ]
I think Elwood is right about the law (0.00 / 0)
but especially right about the willingness of the current Supreme Court to set aside such archaic niceties as the constitution when necessary to retain power. The Democrats would be well advised to put a lot of effort into defeating this at the polls. Which of course is energy and money diverted from other election tasks. So in  sense it is a win-win for the bad guys.

"But, in the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope." Si se puede. Yes we can.  

[ Parent ]
The CA Secretary of State (4.00 / 1)
should refuse to allow it on the ballot, on Constitutional grounds.

Let the GOP go to court.


[ Parent ]
Good luck on that! (0.00 / 0)
No way the Sec. of State would block a ballot initiative in California -- no way. Ditto the Legislature, which last I knew was close to 50-50, "ignoring the will of the people." The Mass. Legislature does that routinely, notably on the bilingual education ban, which passed 2-1 but was overturned by the 75% Democratic legislature, but the national GOP would put a lot of heat on the state legislators.

Whatever happened to "you can't change the rules in the middle of the game?" We need a national commission on keeping or eliminating the Electoral College.


[ Parent ]
Since posting that (0.00 / 0)
I looked into the history of California ballot props.

The State Supreme Court took one off the ballot in recent years, but you're right -- the SecState doesn't, and perhaps cannot.


[ Parent ]
I just hope that we can deal with this legal question (4.00 / 1)
before the election.  I'd rather not have to watch this work its way through the courts after the election and have another president decided on a court decision, even if that president happened to be my choice.

That type of legal challenge with obvious, direct political consequences would just further fracture the political process.

Where do we go from here?


This is not bogus (0.00 / 0)
The initiative was drafted by a Republican lawyer and election law expert.  They know what they are doing.  He was one of the masterminds between Arnold becoming governor as Davis was being recalled.  It seems it would be perfectly legal for the legislature to delete this power to the electorate by initiative.  This effort is ignored by us at our peril.  Californians know it is for real.  We don't need to dis their efforts to nip this in the bud.  Also, be very careful.  Your posts here are being used to dampen opposition to the effort to stop the initiative.

They certainly know what they're doing -- (0.00 / 0)
Creating a huge distraction that will draw Democratic resources nationally. But it violates the US Constitution. If you would like to engage on that, go ahead.

And your effort to stifle speech through fear sux.


[ Parent ]

Connect with BH
     
Powered by: SoapBlox