About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors
Dean Barker
Laura Clawson
Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe
William Tucker

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
Katrina Swett
Jennifer Daler

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Edwards Declares War On Hope (and it's about time)

by: Mike Caulfield

Fri Dec 29, 2006 at 19:49:03 PM EST


You want to know what a preemptive strike on the Obama candidacy looks like? Here is it is, textbook perfect, from John Edwards himself. Today, standing in front of a sign asserting "Tomorrow Begins Today" he stated:

"Identifying the problem and talking about hope is waiting for tomorrow."

And in perhaps the most brilliant framing I've seen in this campaign so far, he began to weave a theme into the rest of the remarks: There's hope, and there's action. I'm action.

Examples? Well, perhaps you were waiting for the Federal Government to raise the minimum wage. Not Edwards. He is fresh off a campaign to raise the minimum wage state by state, and has had success so far in six states. He has worked with organizing unions.

It continues. Asked what he will do about issue X, the response is invariably twofold. First, let me tell you what we are already DOING, and second let me tell you what we all can do, with or without me.

And it comes back to us as well. "What are you all doing about it?", is a question he's not shy about asking. We've got to invest in renewables, but we also have to conserve. We have to address economic injustice, but we can start by organizing, and getting laws passed on the state level. Don't wait for me in the White House in 2009. And for God's sake, don't talk about hope. Do it, now, today.

Edwards, in an unorthodox move, is not asking you to join a campaign. He is asking you to join a movement.

And in perhaps the most unorthodox but also most intriguing message, he is saying that he plans to use the power of his campaign to get stuff done before 2008. That's right. He wants to use his campaign to get things done.

I am still processing this, thinking of historical parallels, and trying to figure out how he believes his campaign will push political change before the general election.

And I'm still really blown away by the uniqueness of his voice in this field. This is not the "I can win the South" Edwards we knew in 2004. This is Edwards as Community Organizer (and yes, the irony of that when Obama is in the race is not lost on me).

I've seen some press on Edwards and the poverty focus, remarks on Edwards and Gay Marriage, remarks on this or that regarding the Iraq War. I think all these miss the most interesting point about his campaign.

Asked by a blogger from Below Boston whether he planned to run a grassroots campaign, Edwards said yes, but it was much bigger than that, because grassroots activism is woven into the DNA of everything they are doing.

That claim is either bullshit, or it's the most essential thing he said today, something beyond the issue matrix. I don't know which it is yet. But I'm hoping we can find out.

So help me out in the comments...Edwards, Man of Action? Or simple pose?

Mike Caulfield :: Edwards Declares War On Hope (and it's about time)
Correction: I originally wrote the signs read Tomorrow "Starts" Today. They read Tomorrow "Begins" Today.
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Good post (4.00 / 2)
A lot to think about. Usually I'm ready with some kind of reaction to most things I read, but this one requires some thinking.

Thanks (4.00 / 1)
You don't know how much that means to me coming from you, seriously.



[ Parent ]
I Agree (0.00 / 0)
This is the kind of post I like to see.

Something genuine that was taken away from the event, missed by the MSM.

Thanks!


[ Parent ]
Edwards, Gravel, and Gore (0.00 / 0)
have the best current position for election to the Presidency: Unemployed (e.g., Nixon, Carter, Reagan).

But it seems a little risky to launch a 'Less talk, More action!' campaign from that position. Obama and Clinton are about to legitimately take credit for their winning votes on a national rise in the minimum wage, for example.


Admittedly a better strategy (0.00 / 0)
If the Dems are in the minority.

On the other hand, there are perhaps ways to get things done despite his lack of current employment...



[ Parent ]
And 'unemployed' (0.00 / 0)
is a bit of an exagerration. He heads his own poverty institute, Gore is an author and on the board of Apple. The special political status I'm talking about is a combination of:

  • Not in elective office taking controversial positions in reaction to unplanned events
  • Not responsible for duties that will appear to be neglected as you campaign
  • Not reporting to a supervisor


[ Parent ]
You guys nailed it..... (4.00 / 2)
As I was sitting there live blogging(listening to the audio sitting at the bloggers table) I was struck at how he kept saying -take action

Take action;he's trying to increase participation by Americans in the process of governing and having the populace re-engaging in the processes of democracy.As one who just finished actively volunteering in the Deval Patrick campaign AND daily blogging I'm hearing the same essence of a message which is(my words for both men) this system of ours isn't going to work unless we all participate and make change happen by taking action.

I have a newer diary up at my blog belowboston  in which I reflect on how easy he is trying to make this re-engagement - reaching out to us -the local bloggers- so that we "spread the word", "Help tell the story" just in case the MSM misses it, getting on-line questions, live streaming,  at the end practically begging for on-line questions - all to what end? To start a dialogue in which important issues are brought forth and discussed by citizens. It's like kick starting an engine.

Kick starting a stalled democracy.

Do we have to relearn how to be citizens of a democracy? We do if we want change. We have to "take action" to make change happen.

While we were waiting for him in our"blogger room" we could hear him answer question after question about Iraq from CNN. I got the sense that Iraq  will suck the oxygen out of the race for all other issues if the MSM has anything to say about it, giving us a stalled democracy.

So his message(to me anyway) was take action,put pressure on elected officials for the change you want, assume responsibility.

Great meeting you guys!!


Great meeting you too (0.00 / 0)
I just linked Below Boston up in the story (sorry about that, oversight).

Thanks for asking the question that gave me my conclusion ;)

I imagine we'll be seeing you guys again? Although I was surprised by the Edwards event, we're still pretty agnostic up here, so we should be going to all the candidate events.



[ Parent ]
You are very welcome ;) (4.00 / 1)
You will definitely be seeing us up in NH for the primary season. Although on the ride back we all kind of decided to stick to Portsmouth, Nashua, and Keene events to cut down on the driving time.

We had discussed how we were going to approach the NH primary when it seemed that way more would be running(Warner, Fiengold,Bayh plus everyone else) now we wonder if all that many will get in the race.

Another aspect to consider is if all candidates will even allow bloggers the same access as we had.

See you guys on the primary road


[ Parent ]
Let me know if you... (0.00 / 0)
...keep the drive time low between Boston and Keene. Every route I've tried (in the other direction) is longer that Boston-Concord or Boston-Manchester.

[ Parent ]
Not Manchester? (0.00 / 0)
You should come visit Manchester; it is the largest city, and it has a more conservative Democrat than Portsmouth or Keene, and will be an interesting alternative view.  Plus, the traditional media outlets all headquarter in and around Manchester as you get closer to the primary, and, since the only statewide newspaper and statewide tv station are in Manchester, as well as about 10% of the state's population, the candidates tend to spend more time here.  And it has better restaurants - Portsmouth used to have better restaurants, but Manchester has more these days, including more ethnic restaurants.  Also, Manchester is the most diverse community in the state; it looks a lot more like America than the rest of the state with thriving minority communities; there are active Black and Hispanic Demcoratic caucuses in Manchester. 

[ Parent ]
Reminds me of Howard Dean's (4.00 / 1)
you have the power.  This is even stronger in saying not only do you have the power, but use it now!

Florida Kossacks Rock You can't govern if you can't win!

[ Parent ]
He's aiming to be the Dean of 2008 (4.00 / 2)
What you're describing about Edwards sounds a lot like what Dean was trying to do in 2004--creating a campaign that is empowering rather than autobiographical. Dean's message wasn't "I'm electable" or "I'm experienced" or "I'm the son of a millworker," it was "You have the power," and that simple shift in pronoun fueled an extraordinary people-powered campaign.

Yes. (4.00 / 1)
Your observation is no small part of my upcoming impression of the Edwards event.

And as for "hope", I think Mike is dead on target here.  Though I will also say that "hope" was a major theme of Edwards 2004.  Is he also placing the old Edwards out of the frame with that line as well?

birch, finch, beech


[ Parent ]
I would have said that myself EXCEPT (0.00 / 0)
A certain Deaniac I was with was not so taken with it.

It's definitely a 180 shift from Edwards "Son of a Millworker" Town-called-Hope rehash of 2004. This is a much bolder campaign, and as you say, he may be cribbing from Dean...In fact, perhaps that will be the problem he has with the Deaniacs -- that he is cribbing it -- there will be a sort of Nirvana effect where you resent Nirvana because they are cribbing the Pixies,  Husker Du, and the Meat Puppets...and goddammit, you were listening to that stuff when it was fresh.



[ Parent ]
Brilliant analysis (0.00 / 0)
And I'm not just blowing smoke up your ....

I got a chance to take part in a conference call for bloggers from his OAC PAC before the announcement, here are some of my transcripts:

"We're not going to wait until the election, we're going to take action right now."

"This campaign is about fixing the mess in Iraq, restoring our moral leadership, building One America, dealing with healthcare and energy crisis, ending poverty."

"The starting point is getting people to act ? getting them involved."

"I want desperately to get this to be a campaign from the ground up."

So, I think you've hit on something really important.  And the proof is in the formation of OneCorps ( http://onecorps.com/ ) which I hear is similar to DeanCorps (I was for Edwards in 2003-4, so I wasn't part of the Dean movement), how much he has reached out to the blogosphere, and how he did the risky move of having a real townhall with unscripted questions from folks off the street (did he really want to answer the budget and gay marriage questions -- most politicians wouldn't but he took the risk because he wants it to be participatory).

The only other place I've seen come as close to your analysis was Dan Balz at WaPo, "Edwards Turns to Non-Tradtional Campaign Model" at http://www.washingto...

And thanks for letting this Michigander crash BH.



Michigan For Edwards Blog


[ Parent ]
But is he cribbing Dean or is he (0.00 / 0)
cribbing from the same playbook Dean used?  One thing that has always frustrated a number of people I know, and me to some degree, is that often people talk about Dean like he invented the grassroots, when really, he used a few out of a range of long-established grassroots strategies.  So is it that Edwards is cribbing from Dean, or is it that Dean is just the most recent in a long line of people to run that kind of campaign?

[ Parent ]
Well, my Indie Rock analogy.. (0.00 / 0)
My Indie rock analogy was in a way trying to get at that. Meaning the part I left out was years after they broke I realized:

a) This was actually a freaking good band, and

b) They had far more of an encylcopedic knowledge of their influences than I did.

But oddly it took me years to get over the fact that the indie bands I loved were still working second jobs while Nirvana was going gold. I resented them, and didn't realize for ages that we were all on the same side...

One of the questions will be whether Deaniacs are attracted to the similarity or put off by it...and part of that come down to how they see the Dean campaigns place in history. It will also come down to whether the perception is that Edwards is taking on this stance because he saw it work for Dean, or whether there is a real embrace of it here.

Edwards has a story available if he wants it: He got more done in two years at his institute than he got done as a full term Senator. That changed him. That's a decent enough explanation I think...now will we buy it?



[ Parent ]
This is great. (0.00 / 0)
Man of action.  I will preface this by saying that I work with John Edwards.  And the only thing that I can add is this:  I am glad you attended.  Ok, one more thing:  I am glad you wrote this.

Thanks for stopping by, (0.00 / 0)
and thanks for being upfront about who you are.  We're glad to have you - and I look forward to attending an Edwards event hopefully next time he's in the state.

[ Parent ]
Political Internet 2.0 (0.00 / 0)
In Edwards pre-announcement on youtube, he hit on the same theme of engaging campaign volunteers into community activities to affect change.  Great stuff and I think it is a natural evolution from the groundwork Dean and Clark laid down in '04.  (Early Clark called for his supporters to donate a day for community service in the summer and fall of '03.)

Edwards is trying to use new technologies to build a field organization of engaged supporters around his central message of poverty.  If it works, it maybe the story of the primary.

And this coming from someone who has Edwards, at best, as third on my dance card.

And thanks for the info on Edwards trumping the "hope" theme.  I underestimated Edwards in '03/04 (man his campaigned sucked in NH) and it looks like he's coming out swinging.

Of course by forgetting about the fact he is the son of a mill worker and now is the leader of a movement, it will give pause to the folks who never liked that "salesman" feel that he has.


Man of Action or campaign strategist? (4.00 / 1)
In October 2005 Edwards visited Dartmouth to launch "Opportunity Rocks" his student volunteer corps that focuses on hunger and homelessness. It was a huge event and he gave a great speech. I felt like everything he said was true, but it didn't feel genuine. It seemed like he was already campaigning.

Last April when he was in Concord, 5 Dartmouth students (I was one of them) went down to report on the success of our group, Project Opportunity. We had taken on the issue of housing because affordable housing is such a problem in the Upper Valley, but all of our service focused on cleaning up/fixing low-income housing. We hadn't done much to actually make housing more affordable. We reported what we had done to Senator Edwards and asked for his opinion on what else we could do. In that room with just the 6 of us, he didn't have very many ideas. Instead we took a picture and were ushered out of the room.

Basically the feeling I got from that encounter is that Edwards has hit upon some great ideas, and he verbalizes them well, but I'm not convinced he actually believes in them as anything more than a campaign strategy.


I'm not sure Edwards is an idea man (0.00 / 0)
Which is not a bad thing in itself. Meaning if he actually did register what you said and took it back to his Institute people to brainstorm (god, I hate that word), then I've got no problem with that.

On the other hand, if it was like Great, you wore your T-Shirts, say "Cheese!", then that's disturbing.

I'd love to hear more about the successes and failures of Opportunity Rocks... besides of course the name, which is clearly in the failure column....




[ Parent ]
Opportunity Rocks (4.00 / 1)
The name certainly is a failure... Last fall the group was pretty active because everyone was still riding on the excitement of Edwards' visit, then in Winter people lost interest. One of our most time consuming projects last year was a pretty big failure. It was designed to raise awareness about affordable housing, and involved interviewing residents of the Upper Valley about how they afford their homes, but for the most part people who struggle to get by were not eagar to talk about it, and we never managed to publish their stories in the Daily Dartmouth which was the original goal. Our various service projects (mostly with COVER in White River Junction) were greatly appreciated by the people they directly affected, but we never found a way to have a bigger impact. The good news in that Project Opportunity (better name right?) is a college-funded community service organization so hopefully it will take shape this year.

[ Parent ]
I thought it was stunning too (4.00 / 1)
I can't speak to the grassroots issue, but noone is like the OAC online operation as far as outreach. That kind of applies to your question in the diary, I think. The netroots is a form of grassroots these days, imo. Today they had a blogger meet and greet. They took a couple of OAC vloggers on tour with them down to NOLA for live blogging the announcement and the clean-up the day before.

In New Haven I went to the one attended by Lamont and Edwards both. The press had to wait outside, they spent 30 or 40 minutes with us before the rally. 

I started blogging over at OAC last spring after the redesign and they totally reached out to me. I did my first vlog in July out in Iowa and now when I e-mail the website Ryan Montoya always responds to me in a couple of hours. Seriously, I'm not even a real blogger, but they try to get people excited and engaged in just about anyway possible.


Yes (0.00 / 0)
This is right. This has been my experience with Edwards' whole organization since the end of the race in 2004. 


Thanks. (0.00 / 0)
Yes,  thanks Mike for this blog. I kept looking at the traditional media to get a feel for what the event was like and I could not find anything.  This is a good example of blogging having an important role in the process.

I found the part about "there is hope, and there is action. I am action" the most interesting part of the diary.

I was wondering how he was going to contrast himself with Obama this year.  It sounds like his plan is to say over and over again that it is one thing to speak about hope, but can you point to actions that you and others can take to make for what you are hoping happen.

As to the criticism that Edwards is an opportunist in stealing the so-called "Dean" strategy, inspiring people to take action in their life is not something that Edwards has discovered just recently.  The death of his son inspired him and his wife to become very involved in their community. They have had to deal with the trauma of Mrs. Edwards' breast cancer and all the fragility of life emotions that something like that generates. 

I also think that the experience of the 2004 election has had a significant impact on how Edwards has decided to proceed this second time. He seems sharper, more focused, and more determined this time. He is saying what he thinks and not worrying about how it sounds.


Random Thoughts (4.00 / 1)
First, I want to say that I think Mike really nailed it.  I was a Deaniac in 2004 and I'm an Edwards supporter for 2008, so much so that I'm talking with the campaign about coming on board as a staffer, but I'm still just a volunteer at this point.

When Sen. Edwards spoke to the bloggers, he commented that 7 out of 8 questions that he was asked by the mainstream media was about Iraq.  During the bloggers' Meet and Greet, it was probably about 50% of the questions, yet from the audience of the town hall, almost on one asked about Iraq.  Iraq is a very important issue, but as Sen. Edwards said during the bloggers' meet and greet, we should be able to talk about Iraq and about taking action here and now to make our country better.

The mainstream media wants the easy story that fits with the ongoing narrative.  Lamont was about the war.  The 2008 election will be about the war.  We can't think about more than that.

Yet Sen. Edwards is about so much more, and we need to take back the presidential political dialog.  We need to make it about the whole country, including those people still waiting for a helping hand in New Orleans.

Now, to my more cynical friends, let me make a few comments.  Is OneCorp simply imitation of DeanCorp?  Perhaps.  Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, and if Edwards can take DeanCorp to a new level rebranded as OneCorp, good for him. 

I went to hear Sen. Edwards at his Opportunity Rocks tour when he was at Yale.  You can read my comments about that here.  Some people felt it was opportunistic.  Even if it is, let's take what he is doing and run with it, because whether or not Sen. Edwards has started this with the purest of motives, it is still a noble effort we should all support.

I feel like I've rambled a bit, so let me try to sum up my reaction.  The real story is that Sen. Edwards' message is, "Ask not what your country can do for you, and don't stop at asking what you can do for your country.  Just Do It!"  Sort of like JFK in running shoes.

Will the mainstream media hear this message and get it out?  So far, it hasn't been doing a great job of it, which is why we really need bloggers and all of the new media to get out a message, not only of hope, but of action inspired by hope.


I'm still waiting for (0.00 / 0)
a government that does what I want.  "country" and "nation" are abstractions, a figment of the imagination.  A government is an organization designed to do things, specifically to deal with things and events people DON'T WANT.

[ Parent ]
There's some good footage from mbair (0.00 / 0)
mbair has posted a diary where they give us a few lessons on how to properly vlog. Very nice job on following up on a comment made by someone in the Q & A:

http://www.bluehamps...




Emerging (0.00 / 0)
Has an article here on Edwards, Man of Action. And by way of that there is an earlierEzra Klein post on the NOLA announcement which seems in line with what we saw yesterday.

I also still have to read the WaPo story mentioned above. But this is clearly emerging as a story....



Great Diary Mike (0.00 / 0)
Thanks for this post Mike. It really give us that weren't there a great feeling of the event, the underlining tone and political angle Edwards was going for. That is the stuff you are not going to see in the trad press. Maybe that is the paradigm for the blog, a Sunday Magazine vs. AP Breaking News. And, BTW, with headlines like that you might get recuited by the UL ;-)

Aldon has posted some photos at the Flickr Primary Pool. Thanks Aldon!

And, remember the poll "To whom will the Deaniacs go" Edwards, has taken the lead but I don't think many have seen the poll, only 14 votes total. I wonder if this event has affected anyone's thoughts?

Hope > Fear




Create a free Blue Hampshire account and join the conversation.


bad link above, corrected here... (0.00 / 0)
And, remember the poll "To whom will the Deaniacs Go" Edwards, has taken the lead but I don't think many have seen the poll, only 14 votes total. I wonder if this event has affected anyone's thoughts?

Hope > Fear




Create a free Blue Hampshire account and join the conversation.


[ Parent ]
Edwards is the one (4.00 / 2)
To follow-up on the comments in this diary, as well as to respond to the "Where Will the Deaniacs" discussion, the answer is clear - John Edwards. 

I strongly supported Governor Dean beginning in February 2003 and continued throughout the primary season. There is no doubt in my mind that John Edwards wants to run a more people-powered, grassroots oriented campaign than Dean did in 2004. 

During his remarks, Edwards echoed Dean's message (paraphrased to the best of my ability) - This election isn't about sending me to the White House, it is about you caring enough to get involved and to make your country and world a better place.  Dean was dead on accurate when he said it in 2004 as is Edwards today. 

In the two years since the Kerry-Edwards ticket lost, John Edwards has found his voice and is clearly more mature and better understands how to run a winning campaign.  Looking at the crowd yesterday, I was impressed by the overall diversity of attendees.  There were more young people and students at this event than I have ever seen at any other event.  Union and labor turnout was huge.  Senators D'Allesandro, Foster, Gottesman, Hassan, and Fuller Clark were there.  Speaker of the House Terie Noreli and a large number of State Reps (including Sharon Nordgren all the way down from Hanover).  Congresswomen-Elect Carol Shea-Porter.  Portsmouth Mayor Steve Marchand.  Local heroes Paul O'Connor and JJ Joyal who saved our shipyard were also in attendance. 

Just for comparison - when Obama came to town, on his first visit ever to New Hampshire, he drew 1500 people at an event organized by the New Hampshire Democratic Party, its fulltime staff of 9, and its massive infrastructure.  This trip by Edwards, his 9th or 10th since 2004 let alone all previous primary appearances, and arranged by 1 New Hampshire staff person drew a comparable crowd.  Is this a sign that Edwards is the rockstar that Obama is?  Or are people just that ready to elect a Democratic president?  I think yes and yes.  And I also think, despite Howard Dean and the DNC, the New Hampshire primary will be stronger than ever in 2008. 


Mike, you captured what few main stream journalists (0.00 / 0)
caught.  Like Phil I was privy to that conference call the night before he announced in NOLA.  I was not expecting him to come on so intense. He called for us to take action and "seize control" of the discussion.  The word "Seize" really struck me at the time.  As much as I have admired Edwards since 2003 along with Dean, I have lately been very disillusioned with politics.  I work hard for candidates only to see them turn into corporatists.  I see them run as Democrats and then govern like Republicans.  By that I mean that they quickly leave their "supporters" far behind.  They pay lip service to "grass roots".  And, quite frankly, become back room bullies.  This was different.  That he said "we can't wait for the election" was huge.  My very leftie friend who protested in Chicago in 1968 and fled with her draft dodging husband to Canada, keeps saying that we are only addressing symptoms and not the problems.  She worked hard in getting locals elected here, but her favorite phrase is "Cut to the Revolution".  Edwards just said it too.  We are going to hell in a handbasket and we need to "Cut to the Revolution". Viva Zapata!  Viva Las Vegas!  Thanks for letting me stop by.
"We have it in our power to begin the world over again".  Tom Paine

Thanks MM (0.00 / 0)
I just finished watching This Week with George S. -- He interviewed Edwards and Edwards kept trying to talk abou this take action thing, and George kept bringing it back to the old standbys: Gay Marriage, Iraq War, Energy.

Great questions for a general election where there may be substantial differences on those questions. Idiotic questions for early in the primary when there does not seem to be that much difference between the candidates on the outline of the problems we face currently (history is a different thing).

The big story emerging on the net is is Edwards the New Dean Campaign? It's not about the issue matrix, it's about the fundamental question of HOW our leader will lead. Issue matrix is fine and important but if Edwards is what he claims that he is (and that's still an if in my mind), then THAT is so clearly the story.

There was one point this morning where George asked something about energy, and Edwards made an end run with his "Take action" message, and he wasn't a sentence into it before George jumps in and says, yes, but how does that transform to policy.

I love policy discussions. I thrive on them. But I don't think we are at that point yet. Edwards has staked an astounding claim in the past couple days, lets sift that out before we replay Gay Marriage quotes...



[ Parent ]
I should also say regarding issue matrix (0.00 / 0)
That George S. was still clearly stuck in the General Election -- he could have spent substantial times on unions, where there are differences, or more than 30 seconds on the deficit where there is a difference, but instead the ONLY two clips he played from the Portsmouth event were on Gay Marriage. And he opens that segment with reference to the UL.

So even on the issue matrix, clearly covering this election like it was October 2008.



[ Parent ]
More than following Dean (0.00 / 0)
This probably shows my age, but, as I read this post, I thought about another politician who used this general message - John Kennedy.  I'm not disagreeing that Edwards could be following Dean's example.  The words that hit me as I read this post were from Kennedy's inaugural address - "Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country."  Kennedy was a (literally short lived) breath of fresh air for this country and brought a new energy and vitality with his election.

Whatever example Edwards is following, I agree that it's a great strategy.


I think that's true on a vision level (4.00 / 1)
I think on a tactical and strategic level there are some Dean parallels -- I think Laura siad it best when she said he's pulling out of the same playbook as Dean, which is not the same as pulling from the Dean playbook.



[ Parent ]
Tomorrow begins today - same phrase used by EZLN (Zapatista) leader Subcommandante Marcos (0.00 / 0)
Has anyone else noticed this? I know it is a bit trivial but I thought it was an interesting coincidence.

The real deal (0.00 / 0)
Edwards is, finally, moving beyond "talkin' the talk" and I think you are right to give him credit where it's due.  He's been spending time with working folks to create change...and that's a pretty unique thing for a candidate.  Of course, my family members in Chicago will say the same for Obama...Here we go!


Connect with BH
     
Powered by: SoapBlox