About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors
Dean Barker
Laura Clawson
Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe
William Tucker

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
Katrina Swett
Jennifer Daler

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Carol Shea-Porter Calls Out KBR Contract Renewal

by: Dean Barker

Wed Feb 18, 2009 at 19:22:23 PM EST


What do you get when you do such a lousy, incompetent job that it results in the electrocutions of men in uniform not in combat?
Apparently, you get another contract.  A thirty-five million dollar one. For an Iraqi electrical project.

Carol Shea-Porter is not amused (email release):

"I am very concerned that KBR was awarded a new contract, and I urge Secretary Gates to conduct a thorough review of this contract award," stated Congresswoman Shea-Porter. "Americans deserve to know why KBR has been awarded this multi-million dollar contract, given their long record of deficient electrical work in Iraq."
Full release below the fold.
Dean Barker :: Carol Shea-Porter Calls Out KBR Contract Renewal
Shea-Porter Challenges KBR Contract Renewal for Iraq Electrical Project
Urges Secretary Gates to Conduct Review of Defense Contract

Washington D.C.-Today, Congresswoman Carol Shea-Porter announced that she sent a letter to Defense Secretary Robert Gates asking why defense contractor KBR, Inc. was recently awarded a new $35.4 million contract involving electrical work in Iraq. Military criminal investigators have reopened five cases, and the Army Criminal Investigative Service has classified one of them as "negligent homicide."

"I am very concerned that KBR was awarded a new contract, and I urge Secretary Gates to conduct a thorough review of this contract award," stated Congresswoman Shea-Porter. "Americans deserve to know why KBR has been awarded this multi-million dollar contract, given their long record of deficient electrical work in Iraq."

Last year, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform conducted an in-depth investigation into the problem of electrocutions in U.S. facilities in Iraq. They found that KBR was alerted to the deficiencies, but failed to take corrective action.  In 2008, the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) issued a "Level III Corrective Action Request" to KBR, indicating that the contractor was in "serious non-compliance."

Shea-Porter was joined on her letter by 18 of her colleagues, including Rep. Henry Waxman, who oversaw the investigation into this matter when he was Chairman of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.  You can view a copy of the letter below.

The Honorable Robert M. Gates

Secretary of Defense

The Pentagon

Washington, D.C. 20301-1000

Dear Mr. Secretary:

We are writing to express our concern about recent reports that the Department of Defense has awarded KBR a $35.4 million contract that includes major electrical projects and request that you review the contract award and report to us explaining why the contract award was made to KBR, given its long record of deficient electrical work in Iraq.

As you are aware, KBR has held a contract for building maintenance for U.S. military facilities in Iraq since 2003.  During this time, there have been numerous investigations into the dangers KBR's faulty electrical work is creating for our military personnel. The Department of Defense Inspector General is currently investigating the electrocution deaths of 18 Americans (16 soldiers and 2 contractors) in KBR-maintained facilities.  KBR is under criminal investigation for the electrocution deaths of several U.S. soldiers in Iraq.   The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform conducted an in-depth investigation into the problem of electrocutions in U.S. facilities in Iraq and the death of Staff Sgt. Ryan Maseth, 24, a decorated Green Beret electrocuted in his shower on January 2, 2008.  The Committee's investigation showed that KBR was alerted to the deficiencies in this and other cases, but failed to take corrective action. In 2008, the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) issued a "Level III Corrective Action Request" to KBR, indicating that the contractor was in "serious non-compliance."  This action request, the final warning before a contract is terminated, points to KBR's continuing failure to ensure electrical safety for our troops.  With this history, it is not surprising that Capt. David J. Graff, commander of the DCMA's International Division, was quoted in an Associated Press article, stating that "many within DOD have lost or are losing all remaining confidence in KBR's ability to successfully and repeatedly perform the required electrical support services mission in Iraq."

Despite these serious, ongoing concerns, the Department of Defense has awarded KBR a new contract that includes the type of work that KBR failed to perform adequately for years.  Threats to the safety and lives of soldiers or others because of known hazards and negligent performance of work are not acceptable.

We would therefore appreciate a thorough review of the recent contract award to KBR.  At the very least, when our soldiers put their lives on the line for us in a war zone, we not only owe them the assurance that they will not be electrocuted in the shower on their return from a mission, but also that those who provide them with services put our soldiers' safety ahead of their profits.

Thank you for your consideration, and we look forward to your response.

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Why does this kind of thing happen? Because that's how it's planned. (0.00 / 0)
"Privatization"--i.e. handing over government functions to private corporations--has two goals.  The first is to evade being accountable to the public which funds these functions by hiding them behind the shields of privacy, patent rights, confidentiality and attorney/client privilege.

The second is to avoid responsibility for any action--right or wrong--that is undertaken.  Having no responsibility is the reward for being obedient. When a representative of the corporation asserts that they "remain committed to pledging our full cooperation" with an investigation, no action is promised or likely to be taken.

It's not just the Republican party that's the party of no.  The nation is riddled with people whose sole aim is to avoid responsibility.  One suspects that's why Rick Warren's "Purpose Driven Life" appeals to them.  Having an intent, a purpose, a commitment or a goal is sufficient; no action needed.  There is nothing to be achieved when the intent is the beginning and the end.

How does one punish people who have done nothing?  How does one respond to Bartleby the Scrivener?  What do we do about a decider who makes no decisions?  Inserting GWB in the White House was not a happenstance.  It was done on purpose.


this is why she's the best (0.00 / 0)
The extra work she does every time these issues arise is outstanding.  Her votes and her legislation are enough by themselves, and if she didn't stay on top of each little contract no one would complain.   But she's in this for the long haul, and she'll shine a spotlight on these outrages every time.  And that's where her committment pays dividends for her constituents.


Connect with BH
     
Powered by: SoapBlox