About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors
Dean Barker
Laura Clawson
Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe
William Tucker

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
Katrina Swett
Jennifer Daler

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Politico is a Journalism Black Hole

by: Dean Barker

Fri Feb 20, 2009 at 05:48:15 AM EST


While TPM, dKos, and more recently others have been hitting back, I've mostly kept my mouth shut on Politico's new and ridiculous gotcha style they've put up since inauguration.  But this just takes the cake:
The Obama Cabinet is a CEO black hole
By EAMON JAVERS

In President Barack Obama's Cabinet, there is a Nobel Prize winner, a former mayor, and a veteran CIA agent. Surrounding him in the White House West Wing are a former four-star general, one of the nation's most eminent economists, and a handful of this generation's most talented political operatives. This constellation of talent, however, has something of a black hole. There is virtually no one on Obama's team with outsized achievements or a high-profile reputation earned in the world of business.

There are no former CEOs in the Obama Cabinet. And among the people who make up his daily inner circle, there is only a dollop or two of top-level private sector experience.

This is a notable absence, particularly for an administration whose domestic reputation will hinge on whether it can reverse one of the steepest economic downturns in decades.

Let's leave aside how monumentally stoopid this is for a moment - that we should people a government tasked with fixing the economy with the same category of morons who broke it!.

The problem here is much deeper than the issue in that article.

The "John Smith doesn't own a TeeVee in his home, and maybe this makes him a terrorist" meme is not reporting. It doesn't even make good blogging.  It's suggestive for no purpose other than to throw smoke onto a subject where there's no fire and to get the reader reading Politico.

Give me the cartoon monsters on FOX or RW hate radio anyday over this insidious, poisonous, spawn-of-David Brooks trend.

Dean Barker :: Politico is a Journalism Black Hole
Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
There's also the matter (4.00 / 1)
of what the term "black hole" means.

Republico seems to think it means "big empty space." But it actually means "incredibly dense, packed tight space" that sucks everything into it.

Just a minor point, of interest mostly to people who consider writing a craft and accuracy a virtue. If Republico ever hires anyone like that they might notice.


or well n/t (0.00 / 0)


We represent the Lollypop Guild, the Lollypop Guild, the Lollypop guild.

[ Parent ]
This guy Javers (4.00 / 1)
is either kidding or stoopid. And Elwood, the sloppy use of words is a major giveaway. Either this guy is a bad writer, so how and why is he writing for a supposedly serious mainstream publication? Or he is misusing words to elicit a certain response, which is propaganda.

Anyway, the record of the creme de la creme of CEO land is pretty bad. They don't belong anywhere but in jail or in a crappy public housing project somewhere.

Also, I don't know what planet some people are orbiting but let me write this slowly and boldly:

Government  is  not  a business .

Government has a totally different mission in this world than a business. It is not a business and should not be run like a business. Why does this stoopid meme refuse to die? Even in the face of the abject failure of the "best and brightest" business has to offer?


It refuses to die because for a very long time (0.00 / 0)
American industry and commerce looked upon government as an adjunct--as a source of access to resources and rights and a repository of unwelcome costs.  In recent years, our military industry hasn't just eclipsed all other endeavors, the threat of military force has been used to open markets and gain access to natural resources, just as if we were back in the days of gunboat diplomacy.
From the conservative perspective, the purpose of government is to advance the interests of the ruling class and keep the unruly population in line.

Barack Obama has generated considerable angst in the industrial/commercial/financial class.  Just naming the stimulus the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act was an example of throwing down the gauntlet.  When talk radio rants about the "community organizer" and claims grants to ACORN that don't actually exist, they're speaking in code.
The word "reinvestment" is a red flag, not because the CRA actually made it possible for the wrong people to move into the wrong neighborhoods, but because the CRA required banks and other financial institutions to OPEN THEIR BOOKS TO PUBLIC INSPECTION.  The ability to act arbitrarily and in secret is the touchstone of power in a world where decisions can no longer be made on the basis of personal characteristics.  More than anything what's thrown the fear of god into Wall Street is the assault on secrecy in combination with reversing the flow of the money.
See, the money itself is not important.  It's the direction it flows in that counts.  When government spends and Wall Street lends, everything's right with the world.  When Washington lends and Wall Street has to borrow, the world has come to an end.  Ditto for the money that's going to flow into the mortgage market.

To a large extent, the housing bubble is segregation by another name.  And it's not just the gated communities that perpetuated legalized segregation with voluntary segregation.  Land speculation, zoning regulations, fee inflation, and shoddy construction all took advantage of the fears generated by living next to the wrong people or going to school with brown people.

And that, at least to my mind, has revealed the real evil behind segregation--it facilitates the exploitation of the whole population.  People are angry, and rightly so, because they've suddenly discovered that they were all taken for a ride.  There was no rational basis for the inflated home prices--not for the new houses and not for the old.  It was all a fraud, a bubble that's been growing ever since they repealed the tax on capital gains for the purpose of "liberating people's equity in their homes."


[ Parent ]
"Black hole" is perfectly apt... (0.00 / 0)
If the Politico writer is suggesting that nothing resembling seasoned business acumen is coming out of the Obama regime, and that the administration absorbs business aptitude but does not emit any, then "black hole" is suitable. It is not a misplaced or misused metaphor at all.

The Politico report is actually spot on: it is rooted in fact. There is nothing false about the actual reportage; the only beef here is with what the facts imply. One could note that Barack Obama has never actually led in a single business, successful or otherwise. One could also note that Barack Obama has never actually worked in what most of us consider the labor pool. Hence, it could be argued he cannot lead, represent or understand from either a business OR a labor perspective. He may receive information from both sides of the business dynamic, but he cannot emit anything that is born of any experience.

If it's true that government is not a business (as suggested above) then it seems equally true that government does not create wealth or jobs, since those are the principle functions of business. And yet the new administration very much believes in acting as a business surrogate during this recession. I doubt anyone here has a problem with that, do they?

Also, does any astute observer paying the tiniest bit of attention believe that the business community in general, primarily its CEOs, are responsible for this recession? I don't believe Mr. Obama would even remotely agree with that. He even stated that we are here in large part because of the grotesque abuses -- on all sides, including legislative -- in the housing/lending sector. Of course, such are not the true engines of wealth generation; they are, in a real sense, secondary. But it is absurd to blame our woes on CEOs in the manufacturing and industrial sectors, the very sectors that form the base of any wealth-generating economy.

An aside: Did you know that those states with the weakest union presence produce more jobs, more wealth, and more overall economic growth? I pass this along because I did not know this until, well, yesterday.

Just some thoughts.

Peace.

BG


More baloney from Gnade. (4.00 / 6)
Let's start with the unsourced lie.

Here's a chart of union membership by state. And Here's a chart of poverty rates by state. Gnade doesn't provide a source, because his claim is an obvious distortion at best.

The rest of his post is the usual Gnade set of straw men. The writer didn't say the "black hole" was about what comes out of the administration - the writer said the administration is a "CEO black hole."  Gnade seems to think that the CEOs who belong in a cabinet are the leaders of industry - Robert McNamara and Paul O'Neill being the most visible examples.


[ Parent ]
Dear Mr. Gnade, (4.00 / 3)
Thank you for coming here to defend the Politico piece.

That choice serves to reaffirm my initial feeling about it.

Pax,

DB

birch, finch, beech


[ Parent ]
Bush hired a bunch of CEOs and all we got was perpetual war and deep recession ... (4.00 / 2)
Dick Cheney, Vice President (CEO, Halliburton, 1995-2000)

Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense (CEO, Searle, 1977-87; CEO, General Instrument Corp., 1990-93; Chairman, Gilead Sciences, 1997-2001)

Andrew Card, Chief of Staff (CEO, American Automobile Manufacturers Association, 1993-98)

Paul O'Neill, Secretary of the Treasury (CEO, Alcoa, 1987-99)

John Snow, Secretary of the Treasury (CEO, CSX Transportation, 1985-88; CEO, CSX Corporation, 1989-2003)

Henry Paulson, Secretary of the Treasury (CEO, Goldman Sachs, 1998-2006)

Donald Evans, Secretary of Commerce (CEO, Tom Brown, Inc., 1985-2001)

Samuel Bodman, Secretary of Energy (CEO, Cabot Corp., 1988-2001)

William Donaldson, SEC Chairman (CEO, New York Stock Exchange; CEO, Aetna)


Thanks For Calling Them On This, Dean (4.00 / 2)
A CEO is a title that doesn't necessarily establish merit. Just look at Wall Street.

But that's not the point here, Politico's just trying to drum up controversy to get readers. If Obama had CEOs in his cabinet then the headline would just read that it's a black hole of one armed midgets


The Cabinet is not meant to be a pie chart. (0.00 / 0)
You appoint the right person, not the right demographic.

Aside from Warren Buffett, who would have been an excellent Secretary of the Treaury (and probably turned down the job), which specific CEO would be better at which specific job than which Obama appointee?


CQ (0.00 / 0)
The one I hate lately is CQ -- which has just been off the rails.



Yes, they've been (0.00 / 0)
aggressive since January.

A good example is the Murtha earmark "scandal" they broke.

Nowhere in the several pieces on it was there a clear explanation of what the wrongdoing is.

birch, finch, beech


[ Parent ]

Connect with BH
     
Powered by: SoapBlox