About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors
Dean Barker
Laura Clawson
Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe
William Tucker

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
Katrina Swett
Jennifer Daler

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

The Styles Bridges Anti-Stimulus Measuring Stick

by: Dean Barker

Thu Feb 26, 2009 at 21:43:25 PM EST


Just how insane are those governors who want to refuse the unemployment benefits part of the stimulus package?

I think I've found an historical measuring stick for the crazy they feel.

Former New Hampshire Governor, and later Senator, Styles Bridges, is famous, or infamous, rather, for a few things.

Such as his staunch support for Joseph McCarthy.  And his friendship with J. Edgar Hoover, whom he used to spy on his political enemies.  And then there's the time he blackmailed Senator Lester Hunt (D-WY) into dropping out of his reelection race, or else face his son being prosecuted for the misdemeanor of soliciting sex from a male undercover cop. (Hunt refused. Bridges went forward and outed the boy.  The Senator from Wyoming later shot and killed himself in his office.)

But let's leave all that aside.  In terms of policy, Styles Bridges is perhaps best known for being one of the loudest Republican voices against the New Deal, particularly regarding what he felt was FDR's bias toward labor unions.  As is noted (transcription, and any errors, mine) in James Kiepper's Styles Bridges: Yankee Senator,

He complained, "We have expended nationally billions and billions of dollars...and we have made no progress at all...Our present heavy relief expenditures will be with us for many years to come. Don't let anyone tell you differently."
    Roosevelt's 1932 election had been a "ghastly mistake," declared Bridges, which submerged "most of the states in the union beneath a flood of Democratic debt, doubt, and delay."
You'd think this guy would be the mythy archetype for the Rush Limbaugh, Joe the Plumber set, fitting right in with the modern GOP's Party of No "strategy".

Well, guess what? Style Bridges, the Anti-FDR, was nonetheless one of the strongest supporters of unemployment relief around at the time.  From the book (p.249):

Unemployment insurance is not a cure-all, but it is the single greatest constructive step from the staggering burden of relief.
Moreover, in 1935 then Governor Bridges asked the FDR Administration for an additional $20 million in "direct relief" from the Emergency Relief Administration, driven, in part, by the collapse of the textile industry in New England.

So when Bobby Jindal and Rick Perry and whoever else from this parade of charlatan public servants get on their political hobby horse and proudly declare that they will keep money out of the least fortunate of their citizens' hands, remember Styles Bridges.

Bridges, a man remarkable for the stridency of his conservatism and the ferocity of his partisanship, who nonetheless was human enough to understand the basic morality of accepting money that's been offered for the jobless during a severe economic crisis.

Dean Barker :: The Styles Bridges Anti-Stimulus Measuring Stick
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Maybe we can name a bridge after him... (4.00 / 1)


America was not built on fear. America was built on courage, on imagination and an unbeatable determination to do the job at hand. -Harry Truman

Is it a crisis when you've engineered it? (0.00 / 0)
Except for the fact that the bankers' inflation of their own assets has been exposed by the housing bubble they helped manufacture, aren't recessions supposed to be part of the natural economic cycle--a mechanism whereby the workforce is reminded that it had better be grateful to have employment and food to put on their families?

If consumers have been wasteful and workers are lazy (unwilling to take full-time jobs) why would you want to reward them with an unemployment check?  If society depends on a balance of punishments and rewards and the function of government is to punish (keep law and order), then government doling out entitlements to the unworthy destroys that balance.  Of course, you wouldn't want to do that.

It all depends on your basic assumptions.  If you start from the assumption that "all men are created evil and must be made to do good," the punishment/reward scenario makes sense.  The only part I haven't figured out is how the "authorities" who tell the rest of us what to do arrive at being good.  Perhaps that's where "being saved" fits in.


I would prefer (0.00 / 0)
to rework the unemployment compensation system than to start giving people who work or used to work part-time compensation benefits. It could become a hornets nest of problems that we have never had to deal with. I wouldn't go so far as to call American workers "lazy" though. The country has some of the most productive people in the world and we have all seen the data that shows this. The problem has been that for more ordinary workers, this increase in productivity yielded very little increase in income or wealth while at the same time, technology ["modern life," if you will] has made it so that living expenses have increased beyond the point of earnings. Examples? Monthly cell phone and cable/Internet expenses that are easily $200 per family, without the extras, didn't exist 25 years ago. Many of us didn't have health insurance or a need for it either.

I have, however, known people in my life who have gamed the system, even here in New Hampshire where it is very difficult, who expected the taxpayer to pay for every part of their existence. As with everything in life, there is truth to both sides of all arguments and that should be something we look at. Some might consider "welfare reform" a "noble" effort, for example, but it wasn't going to work long-term with a free trade system that encourages low skill, decent wage work to leave the country.

What people seem to refuse to discuss is that the fact that a number of things economically and federally collided all at once to create this new depression and so far, nothing the Obama Administration, Congressional Democrats, or the Republicans, have proposed is going to fix the problems.  

Politizine.com



Connect with BH
     
Powered by: SoapBlox