About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors
Dean Barker
Laura Clawson
Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Betsy Devine
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce

Politicos & Punditry
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
John DeJoie
Ann McLane Kuster
ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

NH-02: "Pure Toss-Up"

by: Dean Barker

Sat Feb 28, 2009 at 21:06:38 PM EST


That's what Stu Rothenberg, in his first House rankings for the 2010 cycle, called the spot Paul Hodes will leave vacant in CD2.

Now, I know any open seat automatically increases the competitiveness of it, and I know that before Paul won the spot in 2006 it was held by the BassMaster for a good long while.  And of course whoever the nominee is will have to work overtime to earn the trust and support of the western half of the Granite State.

But even a cursory glance at the voting returns of the second district in the past few cycles should elicit a sense that this is fertile territory for Democrats.

Nashua, to use one telling example, is not nearly as strongly Democratic as other cities and large towns in CD2, but it is the most populous.  And added to that was the fact that the Republican House nominee's home base is there. And Paul Hodes still won there by about 5,000 votes.  And furthermore, Hodes has demonstrated emphatically that a Democrat can win with a strategy aimed north of Nashua.  

Sure, in 2010, no incumbent, and no presidential at the top of the ticket.  But "pure toss-up"? Really?

Dean Barker :: NH-02: "Pure Toss-Up"
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
You can't beat a horse, without a horse. (4.00 / 2)
The Republicans have at least one name, Jennifer Horn, with district-wide recognition. And her primary opponents got some visibility district-wide. (Okay, not much.)

I wouldn't put much weight on all that. Just barely enough to cut Rothenberg some slack.


Agreed (4.00 / 1)
The 2nd CD is far more Democratic than it was twenty years ago, and it should be a safe Democratic seat.  But most midterm elections go against the party in the White House (especially in New Hampshire), and this district could go Republican under those circumstances.

Remember, the GOP has won 44 of the last 48 elections in the 2nd CD.


[ Parent ]
Whether it's accurate or not, (4.00 / 1)
we should assume a toss-up. We should field a strong nominee with strong Democratic values and work like it's 2006.

Take nothing for granted.


...2002 (4.00 / 3)
we should work like it will be a difficult year. This next year and a half offers us many challenges and opportunities but if we work to prepare for the toughest of elections we will be ready for any eventuality and succeed. Which I know we will!

Democrats solve problems, Republicans sit and say no.

[ Parent ]
But I hope we're (0.00 / 0)
more successful than in 2002.

[ Parent ]
It's Cook D+3, so I don't see it as a toss-up between parties. (4.00 / 2)
It is a toss-up in the primary, and if the Republicans have a presumptive nominee a full year before we do (which is not out of the question), it could be close.  That said, I don't see the party of Rush Limbaugh, Eric Cantor, and John H. Sununu making inroads in the Granite State.

2010 Can't Be Predicted... (4.00 / 2)
The 2010 election can't be predicted by the results of 2006 and 2008, nor by current party registrations which reflect, in part, the tremendous turnout by voters in the January, 2008 Democratic Presidential Primary, where many people changed their registration to Democrat to vote for Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama. Depending on factors existing in the fall of 2010, some of those voters may not be jumping with joy with our party.

Barack Obama won't be on the ballot, and he was a major draw for our party in November, 2008. George Bush is also not now a factor, and he was a major help to our victories in 2006.  

The economy, the unfortunate continued American involvement in the War in Iraq, and the fact that our "commitment" to Afghanistan by next year will result in over 1,000 American soldiers being killed there, will all affect the 2010 election.

It won't be a cakewalk, and I agree with Ray Buckley that we have to consider that it will be a tough year for us.  It may well be.

We've seen the pendulum of politics.  It's a real thing.  My advice, other than the admonishment, is that our candidates and their supporters keep in mind the big picture -- and that we not be overly divisive or critical of fellow Democrats.

Virtually every potential Democratic candidate who has been mentioned so far for Governor, United States Senate, or Congress 1 or 2 has been someone I could enthusiastically support in November, 2010.  I'm hoping the September primary will be a positive one so that whomever the eventual nominees are they'll have a solid party behind them.  We can't afford to smash any of our candidates.  Our primary campaigns have to avoid being negative toward each other.  


Chances rise and fall with... (0.00 / 0)
the Dow.

The swing voters will vote based on metrics tied to the economy.

www.KusterforCongress.com  


I'm not sure what pure means (0.00 / 0)
In my book, though, if a good campaign by one party beats a merely mediocre campaign by the other, it's a toss-up.

In Massachusetts, for example, at most levels, you can phone in the Democratic campaign once you clear the primary. So our seats are securely Democratic. Yours ... only somewhat secure.


Connect with BH
     
Powered by: SoapBlox