About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors
Dean Barker
Laura Clawson
Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe
William Tucker

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
Katrina Swett
Jennifer Daler

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Do we really want to give Big Coal a Blank Check with Our Money?

by: Gary Hirshberg

Fri Mar 13, 2009 at 15:42:27 PM EDT


(Welcome to Blue Hampshire, Gary. - promoted by Dean Barker)

Here's an email we sent out earlier today to New Hampshire ratepayers about SB-152, the Mercury Reduction and Ratepayer Protection Act, which is being debated in the State Senate today:

Did you know that 20% of New Hampshire's carbon footprint comes from one place?

It does -- the Merrimack Station coal fired power plant in Bow. The plant is over 40 years old, and the cost to update it to keep up with modern pollution control technology is staggering. In 2006, the New Hampshire legislature authorized the building of a scrubber to reduce the high levels of toxic mercury that is released annually from its stacks - at a price tag of $250 million.  However, Public Service Company of New Hampshire (PSNH) now says they need $457 million of ratepayers' money to complete it -- and it will do nothing to reduce the plant's carbon problem.

Gary Hirshberg :: Do we really want to give Big Coal a Blank Check with Our Money?
Here's a funny thing about this - PSNH is entitled to charge ratepayers 100% of the costs of this project.

Here's another funny thing - They are guaranteed a 9.8% rate of return on every dollar, so this scrubber will not only give an almost completely depreciated plant a new lease on life, but PSNH will get a minimum of $17 million dollars PER YEAR in guaranteed new profits if they complete this project.

In other words, PSNH has zero incentive to do anything other than get this project installed.

Click here to tell your State Senator that this is not in OUR interest.

A lot more than the price tag has changed since 2006. For instance, EVERYTHING - a global consensus that we need to move quickly and decisively to reduce coal burning, an economy screaming for new 21st Century solutions, a new administration committed to delivering them, announced plans for new tougher mercury and carbon and cooling regulations which will bring higher costs, moratoriums on new coal plants all across the US and much much more.

Accordingly, a group of ratepayers has asked the state to review whether it is still a good idea to commit our money to essentially build a plant we don't need (we've got 5-10 Merrimack Stations worth of extra capacity in New England right now) that will commit us to what could be billions of dollars of expected compliance costs to get a cleaner, but still very dirty plant for the next 15 years.

Not surprisingly, PSNH naturally is lobbying incredibly hard that this is still a really good deal for us ratepayers.  They've gotten the unions and residents of Bow all worked up and very fearful that the study could result in the loss of certain jobs and tax revenues.  As a result, an innocent request that someone other than PSNH take a pause to gather some facts to reassure us that our money is being well spent has turned into an emotional and intense debate.

But the ratepayers have persisted and now have SB 152 being debated at the State Senate. SB 152 would require the PUC to do this very reasonable study. And the PUC agrees that it can be done in 90 days.  

And this won't delay the scrubber at all. In fact, PSNH tells us they are already a year ahead of schedule.

It sounds reasonable that the ratepayers should get some objective assurance, doesn't it?

But here's the "funniest" thing of all.  Without the passage of SB152, there will be no study. Putting it differently, the only way that we citizens and ratepayers can get an objective review and any say about whether it is a good idea to proceed with NH's most expensive and significant energy infrastructure project undertaken by PSNH since Seabrook, is to get this bill passed.

Is it really worth $457 million, let alone billions of our dollars to keep dirty coal technology on life support, when it takes us in the exactly wrong direction from where we need to move on climate, and won't even eliminate mercury pollution?

There's only one way to know. We need SB152.

Click here and tell your State Senator to support SB 152.

This project is just the tip of the iceberg in what will be years of costly investments needed to keep the plant in compliance with minimal environmental expected safeguards. Experts are putting this cost as high as $2.9 billion. That's over $6,000 per New Hampshire household.There has got to be a better, cheaper and cleaner way to produce the energy New Hampshire needs. The SB 152 study will give us that answer.

New Hampshire's clean energy future should not be based on 20th century dirty technology without this analysis. Blindly investing billions of dollars to continue operating a coal plant that moves us further away from our carbon reduction goals is not sound policy, not the direction our country is headed in, and not in the interests of our children and grandchildren. If passed, this bill will require an examination into the true costs of continuing to operate Merrimack Station, and allow our elected officials to make informed decisions about the next step in achieving New Hampshire's clean energy future.

We are at an important cross road and your voice is needed. The coal industry is spending enormous sums of money on lobbyists to wage a campaign of misinformation to stop this bill from moving through the legislature, and to stop you from finding out the truth about the true costs of Merrimack Station to ratepayers, to the future of clean energy development and to our planet.

Our legislature needs to hear from you, not lobbyists for the coal industry, about New Hampshire's energy future.

http://www.21stcenturynh.org/take-action

Sincerely,
Gary Hirshberg
21st Century New Hampshire
www.21stcenturynh.org

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Welcome and thank you for the link (4.00 / 1)
I easily sent a note from your link to Sen. Gatsas in support. I am from Bow and speak for no one but, 15 years ago a friend's child at Pembroke Academy studied relative tree circumferences in Pembroke and in Bow. Their high school survey showed that the same species of trees on the Eastern side of the Merrimack in Pembroke, were slightly less robust than in Bow on the Western shore. It was assumed that the smoke and coal ash from the Plant was the reason. People downwind just got to live with the ash. It accumulates on sills etc when the wind is right. Have you ever seen the plume early in the morning while driving down 89s approaching 93 at Bow Junction ? It's disgusting and surreal backlit by the Sun.

We represent the Lollypop Guild, the Lollypop Guild, the Lollypop guild.

What are NH's total energy needs (0.00 / 0)
and why can't they be met with hydroelectric power?

we are actually moving away from hydro (0.00 / 0)
We seem to be moving away from hydro power... it doesn't pollute the air or use up fossil fuels BUT it does involve damming rivers and flooding wet lands and there are some powerful lobbies (oops, an unintentional pun) which are opposed to it.

We have an old hydro project in Durham (referring to another thread on this site) which has been around for 400 years (although it hasn't been generating power for 100)--- the Mill Pond Dam--- and the state seems to be actually trying to get the dam torn down.  And they sure aren't encouraging the town to put in a hydropower plant at the site even though the town could make some money by selling the electricity.  (Obviously there are a few little details which would have to be resolved before building even a small hydroelectric project in the middle of Durham's historic district--- but the idea is an interesting one.)

-----

Thanks for all the fish

-----


[ Parent ]
It is being considered. The tear-down seems no longer (0.00 / 0)
viable.  When 90 people show up at a meeting, it makes an impression.

[ Parent ]
Using people's lungs to clean up after power plants is really dumb. (4.00 / 1)
At some point we've got to clean up after ourselves before we dump our wastes into the atmosphere.

SB -152 discussion causes toxic emissions (4.00 / 2)

http://www.unionleader.com/art...
Power plant study plan fuels scrubber debate

snip

Republican State Committee Chairman John H. Sununu said in a statement: "No matter how hard the Democrats try to sound like they have a constructive energy policy, their actions prove they are anti-energy, anti-growth and anti-jobs. The repeated attempts by the House and Senate liberals to force the Merrimack Station power plant out of business are perfect examples of the radical and destructive agenda that has been adopted by the New Hampshire Democrat Party."

The cause of global warming is the Sun(unu)...it emits more hot air than any power station.

We represent the Lollypop Guild, the Lollypop Guild, the Lollypop guild.



Connect with BH
     
Powered by: SoapBlox