About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors
Dean Barker
Laura Clawson
Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe
William Tucker

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
Katrina Swett
Jennifer Daler

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Judd Gregg's Priorities

by: Dean Barker

Fri Mar 20, 2009 at 05:59:49 AM EDT


Taxpayer money for bonuses to failed bankers: good.
Senator Judd Gregg, a New Hampshire Republican, predicted Congress's efforts to rescind the bonuses through higher taxes would be thrown out in court. He said the legislation violates the Constitutional ban on bills of attainder, which restricts lawmakers' ability to punish individual Americans.

"It's basically targeted on a small group of people," Gregg said. He also said the bill may exceed lawmakers' power to rewrite existing contracts. He said "of course" the government ought to try to rescind the bonuses "but we've got to do it legally."

And:
Republican Sen. Judd Gregg of New Hampshire blasted the House bill, saying "it's a bill of attainder, it's blatantly unconstitutional, it sets a precedent just if it even gets to the Senate of pettiness that's hard to equal."

"It's everybody grab their pitchforks," Gregg added.

Taxpayer money to others: bad.

"With so many sectors of our economy hurting, I seriously question why auto part suppliers deserve billions of dollars, especially when the automakers still haven't yet made all of the reforms necessary to be sustainable over the long term," said Gregg, the ranking Republican on the Senate Budget Committee
Once one sheds taking anything any politician says at face value - an easy thing to do with Judd Gregg in particular, given his recent series of self-revealing fiascos - things become much easier to understand.
Dean Barker :: Judd Gregg's Priorities
Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Judd Gregg's "Ethics" (4.00 / 4)
Remember when he was the nominee for Secretary of Commerce?

He refused to vote on the stimulus package at all, piously stating that it might present an apparent conflict of interest for him to take a stand on the top Administration priority. That recusal had the same effect as joining the Republican filibuster. But hey, ethics is important, and there might be some hint of a personal involvement, right?

Then later, the AP uncovers his real estate dealings. He had joined his brother in investing at the Pease International Tradeport. Then he helped push through a Senate bill directing $66 million to Pease.

Somehow that didn't set off Judd's ethics alarm.

I guess it was AWOL at the time.


Free at last, great god almighty, he's free at last... (4.00 / 1)
This is the real Judd Gregg-defending the right of the powerful to exploit the weak. The idea that this a 'bill of attiander' is preposterous. The House bill is a change in tax policy, not an ex post facto criminal charge.

Waste of time........ (0.00 / 0)

Bill offered by Sens. Gregg, Lieberman, aims at reducing wasteful spending, deficit

New Hampshire Sen. Judd Gregg and Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman have introduced legislation aimed at reducing federal spending.
CONCORD, N.H . -

New Hampshire Sen. Judd Gregg and Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman have introduced legislation aimed at reducing federal spending.

Gregg, a Republican, and Lieberman, an independent, says the proposal would allow Congress to take a second look at some of the current spending and judge it based on its merits. Then, any amounts that Congress has second thoughts on can be used to pay down the deficit, instead of passing on the debt burden to future generations.

Given that Gregg was once a governor, he should know that the legislature doesn't actually control spending.  The Congress approves and appropriates expenditures, but whether or not the money actually gets spent depends on the executive.
Perhaps what he really wants us to forget is that, under his stewardship, the most recent Republican executive managed to spend billions that weren't even approved and to spend some on programs that weren't authorized.
It's said that the best defense is a good offense.  Sometimes what Republicans propose is just plain offensive to common sense.  Liberman and Gregg generating distractions is offensive to the max.  



Connect with BH
     
Powered by: SoapBlox