About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors


Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Betsy Devine
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce

Politicos & Punditry
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
John DeJoie
Ann McLane Kuster
ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

School Funding Amendment: Half was Too Much

by: elwood

Wed May 30, 2007 at 12:01:13 PM EDT


Last night the House Finance Committee amended the Constitutional amendment that the Senate passed at Governor Lynch's recommendation.

The big change is: there is no longer a requirement that the state pay for 50% of an adequate education statewide.

The effect of the amendment now appears to simply be: the state will no longer be required to ensure an adequate education. It may choose to chip in, or not.

The amendment was approved by the Finance committee on a party line vote: every Democrat supporting it, every Republican opposed.

It must now be passed by the 2/3rds of the House (I am not clear on whether the Education committee will make its own recommendation) and then go back to the Senate. If it gets that far it goes on the ballot in November 2008.

elwood :: School Funding Amendment: Half was Too Much
Part of the amendment's language:

In fulfillment of the state's duties set forth in the preceding article, the legislature shall have the authority and responsibility to reasonably define standards for elementary and secondary education in its public schools, determine the level of state funding thereof and establish standards of accountability. The legislature shall have the authority to allocate state funds for public education in a manner that honors the rights and responsibilities of local communities and that reasonably will mitigate local disparities in educational opportunity and fiscal capacity, provided that every school district receives a reasonable share of the state funds.

mitigate: make less severe.

The amendment says that the state's responsibility is no longer ensuring an adequate education throughout New Hampshire. Instead, the state will have a responsibility to make things a bit better than they would be with no state funding.

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Incredible, really (0.00 / 0)
I'm ready to take the 50% version now. Can we go back to that?



The Democrats on the committee (0.00 / 0)
are making a big point of how they used language from Republican proposals to construct the new proposed amendment. It's so unfair and partisan that the Republicans won't support it, they complain.

This whole exercise is a disaster. Whatever party has its fingerprints on this anti-kids, anti-family, anti-education amendment is going to be punished in November 2008.

On this one issue the local Republicans are smarter than the Dems.


Horrible (0.00 / 0)
Back in 2000/2002 I thought the Dems were serious about trying to fix these problems. I was excited when Clif Below beat Jim Rubens to be my State Senator running almost exclusively on an income tax plan. Then Mark Fernald challenged Jeanne Shaheen and gave us an option to show we wanted a real solution, even if he lost. Even after he got crushed putting up the good fight against Benson in 2002 I held out hope, the state wasn't ready yet... Since then it has been downhill. In 2004 I was lukewarm at best towards Lynch on education policy but at least he would replace the truly awful Benson. Now we have swept into power and are going to get saddled with the worst of outcomes, a GOP style ammendment that they won't vote for and we will be pressured to accept to show unity.

If there was a 5% chance I would vote for the earlier ammendment there is a 0% chance I support this one. Hopefully the House Dems give it the quick death it deserves and let's the Court fix the problem they still refuse to really address.


Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox