About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editor
Mike Hoefer

Editors
elwood
susanthe
William Tucker
The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
New Hampshire Labor News
Chaz Proulx: Right Wing Watch

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes

Campaigns, Et Alia.
NH-Gov
- Maggie Hassan
NH-01
- Andrew Hosmer
- Carol Shea-Porter
- Joanne Dowdell
NH-02
- Ann McLane Kuster

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

i would run for state rep if . . .

by: kite

Sat Aug 28, 2010 at 00:01:11 AM EDT


(I addressed this systemic flaw in our "citizen" legislature here as well. Part put below the fold. - promoted by Dean Barker)

My last 3 or 4 comments have consisted mostly of asking people to just shut up, so I felt like it was time to contribute at least a little something. So, we all know the NH state house is the fourth biggest representative body since the dinosaurs, or whatever it is, and I was rereading an old blog about how many democratic slots will go without any candidate at all in the upcoming election.  This is a cross-party problem actually, though it might affect dems a little more.  But really, a problem for state government as a whole.
kite :: i would run for state rep if . . .

Since we are, as a state, unlikely to either shrink the House, nor pay reps adequately any time soon, it might be worth looking for other ways to make the whole thing work.  Personally, my basic problem relative to serving is that I have a regular full-time job (about which I am not complaining).  Other people may have other suggestions based on their own particular difficulties.  But here are a few off-the-top-of-my-head suggestions, not especially creative, that might make it at least possible for me to keep my job and also run for office, someday.

1) Meet on Saturday.  I'm told the committment during the legislative session is at least one day for voting and one for committee work. Fine, but make one of those days a weekend.

2) Allow electronic or remote voting.  This is probably a better alternative than weekend sessions, although they're not mutually exclusive.

3) Allow absentee or proxy voting.

4) Hold discussions during the day, and all votes in the evening, after 7pm.

5) Mix and match. Hold minor or standard votes as they are now, some votes in the evenings or electronically, and really big votes on saturdays.

5) For committe work, have a few committees with all-electronic meetings. (You can do wonders with a phone, a chat room, and a wiki.)

All right, I'm out of ideas sooner than I thought. Still, maybe there's something here worth discussing. No need to keep riding horses to Concord when it's not 1825 anymore.

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Thank you (4.00 / 2)
for raising the issue.  For many of these kinds of issues, we just have to come back to them over and over for any chance of a change.  Inertia is hard to overcome.  Having waited until I was ready to retire to run for the house was, in my not so humble opinion, a waste of all that energy I had 10 years ago.  Not that I am any slouch now, but I can really feel the difference.  



Interesting ideas (4.00 / 1)
If electronic meetings could be "open" to public viewing and also have a physical presence in Concord (say, a room with a large screen) for those without Internet access, you'd have a worthwhile experiment.

I'd oppose proxy voting, but electronic access could enable voting that wouldn't otherwise occur.



good ideas (0.00 / 0)
kite. It's good to be thinking outside the box.

That said, the Saturday sessions are going to be a problem for folks in the upper half of the state, where tourism is how we make our money. Many legislators up here also have businesses to run.  


my comments won't solve anything (0.00 / 0)
I don't see any reason that legislative voting has to be done in a very short time period only by people physically present; it could be done electronically, or could run for a week after discussion concludes.

But no one is going to fix this based on ideas written on the back of a napkin, or some random blog entry.  If the legislature acknowledges this as a real problem, form a committee to make recommendations.


[ Parent ]
well in that case (0.00 / 0)
we can expect to see no change.

The way things are benefits a great many people, most of them older, wealthy Republicans.  


[ Parent ]
Night Sessions (0.00 / 0)
You raise some good thoughts.  There are lots of possibilities in the "electronic age" for better democracy, and we should start to seriously explore some options.

I proposed "Night Sessions" back in the early and mid-1970s, and others have proposed that since.  There are problems with traveling, especially on cold snowy nights, but that is one way we can allow more to participate by being able to run and serve.  Of course, many people work a "night shift" so Night Sessions might exclude them.

In a democracy there is much value to the public hearing concept, and face-to-face expression of points of view is vital in a democracy -- so I'm not sure proxy voting or electronic hearings would be an acceptable alternative.  But all of that is worthy of discussion.

I do think the one most important basic change could be better use of the scheduling of Legislative meetings and duties.  Too much is "squeezed" into January - April.  There is a Constitutional matter that limits us, in that regular Legislative Session Days are to be January - June.  But there could be a way to schedule public hearings on some matters during one "committee" day a week in September through December, then have debate and actual Legislative votes on one day a week January through June.  That would spread out the work, eliminate the crush where everyone can't follow 100 issues at once, and allow more to participate.  I don't know of a school board or city/town council that meets just six months a year.  

Keep bringing up good ideas.  Change occurs step-by-step, one idea at a time.  



Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox