About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editor
Mike Hoefer

Editors
elwood
susanthe
William Tucker
The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
New Hampshire Labor News
Chaz Proulx: Right Wing Watch

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes

Campaigns, Et Alia.
NH-Gov
- Maggie Hassan
NH-01
- Andrew Hosmer
- Carol Shea-Porter
- Joanne Dowdell
NH-02
- Ann McLane Kuster

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

"Granny D's" Cause Might Be Coming To New Hampshire In 2008

by: Rep. Jim Splaine

Fri Aug 24, 2007 at 09:15:37 AM EDT


Something exciting is shaping up to be a real possibility for the upcoming Legislative Session.  In order to make it work, it needs the help of all who believe the political process of this democracy of ours needs to be protected, expanded, and enhanced.

And it could change the way Concord does business.  It would change the way New Hampshire candidates go about their fundraising.  It would reduce the rush for cash that we've seen in recent election cycles.  It will make it possible for more candidates of "limited means" -- whether personal finances or "contacts" -- to be able to run for office.  Those would all be good things.

"Granny D" is a national treasure.  She's walked the nation, walked on Washington, and now she's walking on Concord.  Again, actually -- she's done so several times before. 

During the past 18 months or so I and others have been working alongside Granny D on her concept of "Clean Elections."  Essentially, it is the idea that people running for office should be able to get funding from sources other than lobbyists and other special interests.  Many Democratic and Republican Presidential candidates visiting New Hampshire have been strongly critical of the influence of financial donations from lobbyists and big money in national elections.  That problem, of course, occurs in state elections as well.

The cause of Granny D should be high on the agenda for New Hampshire Democrats and Republicans during the upcoming Legislation Session.  A bill is currently in the Legislature, and a special subcommittee of the House Election Law Committee has held meetings on it during the past several months, including some hot days of Summer.  A citizen group has also been working on the bill.  Three meetings are planned for September -- more on that soon.

Rep. Jim Splaine :: "Granny D's" Cause Might Be Coming To New Hampshire In 2008
Dedicated to passage of the bill are members of both political parties and various political philosophies.  Already speaking for the bill have been former Governor Walter Peterson, former Democratic U.S. Senate nominee John Rauh, former Republican Gubernatorial candidate Jim Rubens, former Democratic Gubernatorial nominee Paul McEachern, former State Senator Clif Below, and lots of others.  You get the picture -- this is a serious bill, with dedicated supporters. 

John Rauh, by the way, has created the national organization "Just 6 Dollars" and "Americans For Campaign Reform," working for public funding for national candidates.  He and his supporters and staff are doing incredible work in Washington, and are helping on our cause here.

The legislation, which we are now calling the "Fair Elections" law, is House Bill 794, and it is referenced briefly below, quoting its "analysis" as printed in the legislation.  It is undergoing a redraft, making it more complete and effective.  We have reviewed similar laws in a dozen other states, including Maine, Arizona, and Connecticut, to make our New Hampshire bill the best model of all.

A similar bill almost passed in the year 2000, when the State Senate approved it, and it came within 28 votes of passing the House.  Governor Jeanne Shaheen had indicated support for it.  It was also introduced in 2005, but with Republican control of the Legislature it had tough sledding. 

House Bill 794 is sponsored by, among others, former State Senator Peter Allen, State Senator Jackie Cilley, and two of our longest-serving "older" House members -- Representatives Betty Hall and Barbara Hull Richardson.  Although the sponsors are all Democrats, we're looking for broad Republican support as well. 

Fair elections are good for New Hampshire.  And for Granny D, who has successfully spoken out for this legislation in other states and in Washington, we're going to try to deliver a victory in her home state during her 98th year!.

HB 794-FN -- AS INTRODUCED

AN ACT relative to campaign contributions and expenditures.

SPONSORS: Representative Jim Splaine, Rockingham #16; Representative Dana Hilliard, Strafford #2; Representative Barbara Richardson, Cheshire #5; Representative Peter Allen, Cheshire #6; Representative Betty Hall, Hillsborough #5; Senator Jackie Cilley, State Senate District #6.

COMMITTEE: House Election Law

ANALYSIS

This bill establishes a fund to provide campaign financing for eligible candidates for governor, councilor, and state senator. Candidates qualify for the financing by collecting a requisite number of $5 contributions and complying with other provisions of the financing law. The candidate will then use money received from the fund instead of private contributions to finance the candidate's campaign.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Excellent idea! (0.00 / 0)
We need this.

If this doesn't work. (0.00 / 0)
Well, if this doesn't work, I'd suggest that instead of focusing on how much money and who can contribute, the law should be directed at the future/potential office holders and specify how much they can accept and who from.  In short, I would suggest that only contributions from individuals who are qualified to cast a vote for a particular candidate can be accepted, without any restrictions on the amount.  So, if I wanted to donate a million dollars to George Bush, I could (and demonstrate to everyone that I'm a total fool).
I agree with the Supreme Court that money is equivalent to speech.  On the other hand, public officials are prohibited from accepting bribes and whether the money goes for a yacht or political ads doesn't make a whole lot of difference.


Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox