About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors


Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Betsy Devine
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce

Politicos & Punditry
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
John DeJoie
Ann McLane Kuster
ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

News from Denver

by: hannah

Mon Nov 10, 2008 at 11:19:29 AM EST


For those who were there:

Undercover cops were among the unruly at DNC
By Felisa Cardona
The Denver Post

When a Jefferson County deputy deployed pepper spray into a crowd during the first night of the Democratic National Convention, he did not know that his targets were undercover Denver police officers.

During a melee that occurred Aug. 25 between protesters, police and bystanders near Civic Center Park, undercover Denver detectives staged a struggle with a police commander in order to get out of the crowd undetected.

A Jefferson County deputy, unaware of the presence of undercover police, thought that the commander was being attacked and deployed the pepper spray, according to a police use-of-force report obtained by the American Civil Liberties Union of Colorado.

 
hannah :: News from Denver
What the ACLU got was an after incident report that's typically required whenever weapons are used.  Since such a report is part of the protocol set up to "protect" the government officials from personal liability for any misuse resulting in personal injury, as well as to insure that the liability insurance coverage is maintained, such incident reports are ipso facto self-serving.

That the headline does not seem to be supported by the report in the sense that there's no evidence anyone other than the cops was being "unruly," can probably be explained by the common practice of employing professional headline writers and the shared interest in bending over backwards in the interest of objectivity.

In the event, the explanation that

undercover Denver detectives staged a struggle with a police commander in order to get out of the crowd undetected

is only credible to someone whose opinion of the police is already at rock bottom.

Whatever happened to all that inter-operable communications equipment homeland security grants are presumably buying?

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
News from Denver | 2 comments
This concerns me (4.00 / 1)
But I'm not quite sure I'm getting your point, Hannah.

I really dislike the idea of undecover cops in a crowd of protestors, no matter what their motivation. Secret Service, OK -- they have a defined purpose. But regular cops feels undemocratic.


The explanation that they had to stage an assault on a (0.00 / 0)
uniformed officer in order to make an un-obtrusive exit from the site is incredible.

That they have proffered such an incredible explanation suggests that they are used to making excuses that are not questioned.  Like many petty crooks, the cops seem to have learned that an admission of stupid behavior (also known as "limited hangout") will get them off the hook.  Much of our judicial system is now predicated on "confessions" and "information from snitches of various kinds" because that's easier than actually finding out what happened.
The reason we have so many repeat offenders, I would argue, is because the crooks have learned that the system sets a higher value on subservience (even if it's insincere) than it does on meting out punishment for crime.  
The system assumes that everyone is guilty of something and can be pressured to confess.  As a result, innocent people are convicted of crimes they didn't commit and, having done nothing, refuse to admit.  In many cases, "innocent until proven guilty" is looked upon as a rhetorical device that sets a trial in motion--i.e. not the defendant's actual condition.


[ Parent ]
News from Denver | 2 comments
Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox