About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors

Contributing Writers
elwood
Jennifer Daler
Mike Hoefer
susanthe

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Betsy Devine
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Mike Caulfield
Granite State Progress
Susan the Bruce

Politicos & Punditry
Dorgan
DiStaso
Landrigan
Lawson
Primary Monitor
Scala
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes for Senate
ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
billmon
Bob Geiger
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

RSS Feed

Blue Hampshire RSS


Marriage Equality In Two More Weeks: We Can Do This.

by: Rep. Jim Splaine

Wed May 20, 2009 at 19:23:05 PM EDT


( - promoted by Dean Barker)

Anything worth fighting for is worth keeping fighting for until you win.

A lot of people worked long and hard to get to this point, and to almost win final approval of our cause today.  So, let's not lose it because of lack of patience, or due to frustration.  We can do this.

Criticizing the Governor, or pointing fingers to a few House members, does no good.  Finding a way to get more House Reps to vote FOR us in two weeks will.  

What has to happen is the Governor's requested language to protect freedom and independence of religion has to pass into statute, and that means House Bill 73 has to pass.  The good news is that we can do this -- the House by a vote of 207 to 168 said that we should have a Committee of Conference to find a way to do this. I take that as a mandate that we should keep at the job.

The Committee of Conference will be created next Wednesday when the State Senate agrees with the House on the motion.

Rep. Jim Splaine :: Marriage Equality In Two More Weeks: We Can Do This.
THEN the CoC will be appointed -- three or four House members, and three or four Senate members.  They will be members appointed by the House Speaker and Senate President.  It will have members dedicated to finding a solution.  The task of a CoC IS to find a way to get both bodies -- the House and Senate -- to say "yes."  

The House and Senate next meet together in two weeks, on Wednesday, June 3rd.  The CoC will report back then, possibly with some new language in the bill.  

Between now and then, our job -- your job -- for this to succeed will be to take a careful look at those who have not yet supported us, and ask them to do so.  Since last Thursday, when Governor John Lynch announced his support for marriage equality and House Bill 436, and offered his requested new language for HB 73, we have only had four days to communicate it.  NOW we have 14 days.  We can win this when more House members hear about why they should support the Governor's language.

Today, we won two important votes, and lost one.  We lost on approval of HB 73 by a vote of 188-186.  There were 24 absent for various reasons, including at least 10 who would vote with us.  We knew today's vote would be close.  All of our head-counts showed we had about 185 votes for sure on the floor today. You can go to http://www.gencourt.state.nh.u... and see those who voted which way, and those who weren't there.

BUT, we won a critical vote on "Indefinite Postponement" of the bill.  We won that by 202 to 173.  That meant 202 House members said they did not want to end this discussion about marriage equality.

THEN, by a vote of 207 to 168, the House approved the motion to "Non-Concur and Request a Committee of Conference."  That's a tremendous message from House members that we should keep discussing this until we get it right.  Otherwise, at that point the majority could have said we've had enough of this for now.  But 207 House members are still listening, and want the dialogue.  

Our job now is to deliver a good bill, inclusive of the Governor's language, and to get the votes to approve.  That's how we get to "yes."

In the meantime, all those House and Senate members who have supported us should receive lots of calls and E-Mails thanking them for their support.  

And Governor John Lynch deserves calls and letters of thanks for coming down on the side of marriage equality.  All he has additionally done is challenge us to come up with a change in statute clearly protecting religious freedom and independence.  That's a reasonable request, and we have to deliver.  

We can do this.  Equality.  2009.  Two more weeks.  

Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Yes, We Can (4.00 / 4)
Jim gets it right (as usual).  We have two weeks to move votes our way.  We can't single out anyone who didn't support us today; there were 188 reps voting "no" which means there are 188 opportunities to turn votes.  We need to focus attention on the real issue addressed in HB 73, a recognition that equal marriage and freedom of religion are important principles under the New Hampshire constitution.  Surely, today's vote will focus our attention in working to get the bill passed in two weeks, and I know it will motivate our supporters who did not attend today or who we didn't quite persuade that the language of this bill deserves support.  A tough day, but with colleagues like Jim to keep us smiling, we'll work hard and get it done.

--David Watters


i admire you (4.00 / 2)
and your perseverance, your poise, your intellect. the faith you have in your colleagues.

in the past year i've gotten more and more involved (quite by necessity must i say), in politics. i can only marvel at how, after each roadblock, you just roll up your sleeves once more, and get ready to work harder. i had not realized the patience, the wisdom that all this requires.

and somehow you manage to remain positive about the process.

it's hard to live in expectation. frustrating. i just don't know how you do it. which is another reason you, and your colleagues, are such an inspiration.

thanks for the hard work


Sounds simple but (4.00 / 1)
I hope everyone realizes you are asking a lot from the 186 who showed up and voted, some of them are already getting a lot of flack which does not bear repeating. It would be helpful to get massive e-mail and phone support to help the folks who need someone to watch their backs at this critical juncture.

Use their rhetoric to change their vote (0.00 / 0)
What if "we" (marriage equality supporters) used "their" (marriage exclusionists) own rhetoric to get them to change their vote?

If marriage supporters would and could take this opportunity, we would see that Governor Lynch is actually making conservative (primarily, but not exclusively) Republican members of the House justify their vote against HB 73, a bill (as Rep. Splaine explains, separate from the marriage equality bill) that "protects" religious institutions from having to support or participate in or "promote" marriages between partners of the same sex.

Supporters of marriage should be asking the Republicans why they voted against [their idea of] God! Marriage equality folks should be using their own rhetoric to change their votes.

"So, tell me, Rep. 'Smith,' why you don't want to prevent those gay people from suing my pastor and my church for refusing to marry them. This is an outrage! I voted for you because I thought you were a God-fearing man who would keep the government out of our churches!"

Nanuq

PS: Rep. Splaine, you probably knew my dad, who was editor of the Portsmouth Herald for many years, retired in 1988, died in 2002, strong supporter of equality.


Yes! (0.00 / 0)
He and I had some disagreements -- it happens in politics and government -- but found more commonality than not and I appreciated a number of endorsements.  A good man, insightful, always getting readers to think.  That is the job of a great editor.  Let's talk sometime!  jimsplaine@aol.com  

[ Parent ]
Powered by: SoapBlox