Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives
Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch
Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
John Lynch
Jennifer Daler
ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC
National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo
50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Here's something new to talk about for those who haven't liked my questions about "How Many Deaths Are Enough," yet unfortunately it is so old because I remember many of these, quite a few which I attended, during the Vietnam Era.
There's a giant "No You Can't"Rally in Washington, D.C. at the White House on December 12th. It will be attended by a number of peace movement groups against the Afghanistan War escalation announced by President Obama.
I received a news announcement of it today. Over 100 leading peace activists will been participating in the rally from 11:00 AM to 4:00 PM "to reject President Obama's planned military escalation in Afghanistan."
The Rally is being organized by "End US Wars," which is a coalition of national and grassroots antiwar organizations. The Coalition has said that unless the President changes course, "efforts will begin to cut short his term in office, along with Congress, and protests will intensify against the United States war involvement in Afghanistan and Iraq."
Speakers will include a variety of nationally-known anti-war speakers, including former NH State Representative Betty Hall, who in her 80s has seen a number of wars, and "Granny D," who is turning 100 next month.
Sometimes I have to shake my head, and this item from politickernh has me shaking my head:
Edge has confirmed Democratic state Rep. Betty Hall, of Brookline, is giving serious thought to running for either state Senate or Congress on nomination papers as an independent candidate.
The rationale behind this idea is, according to the story,
It's no secret Hall is on the outs with the Democratic leadership who is reluctant to support Hall's continued efforts for impeachment. (In case you forgot, she did challenge Ray Buckley for party chair.) That reluctance is making Hall give consideration to bypassing the primary.
1. Bush Should Be Impeached. NH State Representative Betty Hall should again be thanked for pushing her resolutions for impeaching George W. Bush. This man doesn't deserve the title of "President." Bravo to the NH Democratic Party Convention for voting for impeachment, and to the 95 House members who voted for impeachment.
Former Press Secretary Scott McClellan's "What Happened: Inside The Bush White House And Washington's Culture Of Deception" makes Betty's case. The price for that culture of deception has been paid by more than 4,000 of our brave American troops, and by the lives lost of hundreds of thousands of others.
2. Michigan and Florida Delegates Must Be Seated. All of them. We have to figure it out. There shouldn't be an advantage to Hillary Clinton in the way they are seated, but they must be seated -- otherwise, Barack Obama stands a chance to lose Florida and Democrats may do poorer than they should in Michigan in November.
This isn't about the New Hampshire Primary -- we'll maintain our lead-off status in 2012 because we will hold the first primary "...7 days or more..." ahead of any other state that year. This is about the Presidency, and winning in November.
3. Say "NO" To Lobbyist Contributions. Democrats statewide and nationally should be wary of seeking or accepting campaign donations of any amount from registered lobbyists. It's not the kind of relationship our candidates at any level need to reach out for.
There are many other sources of campaign funds without going for contributions which do indeed come with strings. They do. I see it in Concord every day. We see it in Washington every day. Lobbyists are in the business -- a legitimate business but a business -- to sway and influence government. Democratic candidates at all levels should be willing to say, "keep your money."
Campaigns aren't all about raising as many dollars as can be raised; they're about spending those dollars raised well to win. We can run very efficient campaigns in 2008 without the extra dollars raised from registered lobbyists. That way, our elected leaders will be more free to do the right things once elected. We've seen examples of Republicans paying back lobbyists in so many ways once they've been elected. Let's be better than that.
Bless her heart, which is certainly in the right place, but strategy and tactics matter. The effort she spearheaded to deliver an impeachment resolution from the NH House to the US Congress was doomed from the start. Not to mention the damage done not only to the impeachment movement, but to Democrat's electoral chances in November, in both NH and beyond.
I spent Monday evening at the Capitol Center for the Arts in Concord where there was a rally in support of Betty Hill's HR24 which, if passed when it is voted on Wednesday, will go under state seal to the US House of Representatives demanding that Congress begin impeachment hearings immediately. (My friend Bert was at the last minute unable to attend and I was disinclined to go alone. Fortunately despite her marginal interest in things political, my lovely wife agreed to accompany me for which I here express my gratitude.) I attended because I passionately believe that impeachment is the first necessary step to bring our country back from the abyss, if, in fact, we have not already fallen in. I should point out before I go any farther that I do not take good notes, am afflicted with Attention Deficit Disorder, and have a failing memory, traits which helped me to graduate dunno how cum. Please bear with me and I will try to hit the highlights.
I first met Granny D -- just a few quick times -- in 1999 and 2000. I saw her again, and more often, in 2004 when she ran for United States Senate. For those who might forget, she was our Democratic Party nominee against Judd Gregg. Yes, he won, but she took the challenge to him. It was generally a tough year for Democrats.
Back then, I was fascinated by this somewhat short and unassuming woman who seemed to have a lot of get-up-and-go. I enjoyed campaigning for and voting for this visionary, very positive human being.
But only in the past two years or so have I seen her quite up close (REALLY close when she gives you the patented "Granny D Hug"), and come to know, better understand, and even get to love this 98 year old New Hampshire treasure who is made of gold.
I could write so much about her, but watching her for a couple of hours this past Thursday as she experienced one of her greatest victories -- the New Hampshire State Senate approving a bill that she and her cause has inspired -- kind of sums up all about her.
That legislation, House Bill 794, called "The Granny D Bill," creates a seven-member Commission to craft and recommend a public financing program for New Hampshire. Whether that can be done is not the question -- some dozen other states have similar programs for at least some of their candidates, and Maine, Arizona, and Connecticut have rather complete systems. And whether it WILL be done here is not the question -- it will be someday, because it is at least a partial answer to improving democracy and making it more accessible by more of our citizens. It will happen. It has to.
And all that is Granny D's cause. She says the same thing -- that this will happen -- that we must do this not for ourselves, but for our future, and our children. To hear her say that makes you believe that it will be done. Because it has to.
But what was remarkable this past Thursday was to see this energetic woman walk the halls of the New Hampshire State House, a building only a little more than twice her own age, with just a cane while leading her troop of supporters at a fast pace. More on that walk in a moment.
After being introduced to the Senate by Keene Senator Molly Kelly and Senate President Sylvia Larsen, she sat for close to an hour in the historic chamber for her bill to come up and be voted on. It passed unanimously after two speakers, one a Democrat (Senator Jackie Cilley of Barrington) and one a Republican (Senator Peter Bragdon of Milford) recommended passage. Then Granny D stood to the applause and thanks of a gallery full of her longtime supporters who came from throughout the state to cheer her on.
Then she stepped -- "ran" might be a better description -- out of the Senate into her crowd of backers while she answered questions from reporters. In the midst of all this commotion Governor John Lynch walked up the stairs going toward his office. He stopped for a moment to say hello to Granny D. It gave her a chance to corner him on her cause...(more below fold)
A potentially far-reaching bill (presented below the fold) has passed the State Senate and is on its way to Governor John Lynch for his signature.
House Bill 794 creates a seven-member group which will consider public funding options of certain campaigns in New Hampshire -- possibly Governor, State Senate, and Governor's Council. So, this legislation could eventually dramatically affect for the good the way that democracy is exercised in our state.
After a public hearing early last year the bill was sent to a House Election Law Subcommittee which I chaired. There I saw first-hand the enthusiasm for the concept of this bill that Granny D and others brought to her cause as we held a dozen work sessions on the bill.
The Subcommittee even met with Maine State Representatives to learn more about how public funding of certain campaigns works in that state. Altogether, we had over 35 hours of discussion on this bill in the Legislature. HB 794 passed the House on January 16th on a roll call of 199 to 121.
I have dubbed House Bill 794 as "THE GRANNY D BILL," because this is her cause. She walked across America in support of "clean elections." In light of the ever-increasing costs of running for public office and the reliance on personal wealth or extensive fundraising in order to run for public office, this bill seeks to allow for a different approach to funding campaigns for potential candidates without such financial sources.
Legislation similar to the original version of HB 794 was almost passed by the 2000 Legislature. A bill creating public financing of campaigns passed the State Senate that year, and came within 28 votes of passage in the then-Republican controlled House after a lengthy discussion. GOVERNOR JEANNE SHAHEEN was prepared to sign the bill.
The people on the bipartisan Commission created by HB 794 will dedicate dedicate themselves in the next few months to the task of identifying alternative ways to fund state campaigns. The Commission will examine potential revenue sources for funding and develop recommendations to the legislative session of 2009.
This Commission, under the directives of the bill, may consider voluntary contributions, in-kind donations of services, and other means to generate revenue. The Commission will include not more than three members of a political party. No Commission members can currently hold elective office. Two appointments are to be made by the House Speaker, two by the Senate President, two by the Governor, and one by the Secretary of State. The Commission will report back by December 1, 2008, in time for legislative action in 2009.
Some twelve states already have "clean election" laws at one level or another, with Maine, Arizona, and Connecticut having statewide versions affecting most elected offices. This concept has been publicly endorsed by leaders and people who have run for "higher office" from both parties: former GOVERNOR WALTER PETERSON, former Gubernatorial candidate JIM RUBINS, former Democratic U.S. Senate nominee JOHN RAUH, former Gubernatorial nominee PAUL McEACHERN and former State Senators CLIF BELOW and RICK TROMBLY, among others.
In addition, SECRETARY OF STATE BILL GARDNER has been a strong advocate of the legislation and the public funding concept. A number of other long-time supporters of the Granny D cause who have worked with her for the past decade also contributed to the success of the legislation to this point. Representatives of the League of Women Voters, NH Citizens Alliance, Americans for Campaign Reform, Public Action for Clean Elections, and Veterans for Peace NH have also supported the legislation.
I think the Commission will do its job well, and that it will come up with inventive, innovative ways to implement the concept here "The New Hampshire Way."
House Bill 794 was cosponsored by Representatives PETER ALLEN, BETTY HALL, DANA HILLIARD, BARBARA RICHARDSON, SENATOR JACKIE CILLEY, and myself. Several members of the House Election Law Committee worked especially hard on making the bill succeed, including DAVID PIERCE, who prepared the amendment creating the Commission, CLAUDIA CHASE and CHUCK WEED, who were on the Subcommittee which I chaired, along with David Pierce and Betty Hall and went to a number of meetings on the bill, and COMMITTEE CHAIR JANE CLEMONS, who helped in passage on the House Floor.
But this one really is a great victory for Granny D -- who repeatedly would tell us this isn't "about her," it's not even "about us," it's about our children, and our future.
A potentially far-reaching bill (appears below fold) was passed this Wednesday by the New Hampshire House of Representatives. It could eventually dramatically affect for the good the way that democracy is exercised in our state. It passed by a roll call vote of 199 to 121 -- with virtually all Democrats voting FOR the legislation, and almost all Republicans voting against. It happens.
The legislation, House Bill 794, has gone through a thorough review during the past year. After a public hearing last March it was sent to a House Election Law Subcommittee which I chaired. We held a dozen worksessions on the bill. The Subcommittee even met with Maine State Representatives to learn more about how public funding of certain campaigns works in that state.
House Bill 794 is dubbed "THE GRANNY D BILL," because this is her cause. She walked across America in support of "clean elections." In light of the ever-increasing costs of running for public office and the reliance on personal wealth or extensive fundraising in order to run for public office, this bill seeks to allow for a different approach to funding campaigns for potential candidates without such financial sources.
Legislation similar to the original version of HB 794 was almost passed by the 2000 Legislature. A bill creating public financing of campaigns passed the State Senate that year, and came within 28 votes of passage in the House after a lengthy discussion. GOVERNOR JEANNE SHAHEEN was prepared to sign the bill.
Under this legislation, a bipartisan Commission of seven public members will be created to dedicate themselves to the task of identifying alternative ways to fund state campaigns. The commission will examine potential revenue sources for funding and develop recommendations to the legislative session of 2009.
This Commission, under the directives of the bill, may consider voluntary contributions, in-kind donations of services, and other means to generate revenue. The Commission would include not more than three members of a political party. No Commission members would currently hold elective office. Two appointments would be made by the House Speaker, two by the Senate President, two by the Governor, and one by the Secretary of State. The Commission would report back by December 1, 2008, in time for legislative action in 2009.
Some twelve states already have "clean election" laws. This concept has been publicly endorsed by leaders and people who have run for "higher office" from both parties: former GOVERNOR WALTER PETERSON, former Gubernatorial candidate JIM RUBINS, former Democratic U.S. Senate nominee JOHN RAUH, former Gubernatorial nominee PAUL McEACHERN and former State Senators CLIF BELOW and RICK TROMBLY, among others. I think the Commission will do its job well, and that it will come up with inventive, innovative ways to implement the concept there "The New Hampshire Way."
The original version of House Bill 794 was cosponsored by Representatives PETER ALLEN, BETTY HALL, DANA HILLIARD, BARBARA RICHARDSON, SENATOR JACKIE CILLEY, and myself. Several members of the House Election Law Committee worked especially hard on making the bill succeed, including DAVID PIERCE, who prepared the amendment creating the Commission, CLAUDIA CHASE and CHUCK WEED,who were on the Subcommittee along with David Pierce and Betty Hall and went to a number of meetings on the bill, and COMMITTEE CHAIR JANE CLEMONS, who helped in passage on the House Floor.
But this one was really a great victory for Granny D -- who repeatedly would tell us this isn't "about her," it's not even "about us," it's about our children, and our future.