Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives
Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch
Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
John Lynch
Jennifer Daler
ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC
National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo
50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
A report from the non-partisan U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) finds the the cost control provisions in the Affordable Care Act produce a "notable improvement in the long-term outlook" for debt reduction if the law is implemented fully.
The federal government faces long-term fiscal pressures ... driven on the spending side largely by rising health care costs and an aging population. GAO's simulations show continually increasing levels of debt that are unsustainable over the long-term.
Both of these simulations incorporate effects of health care legislation enacted in March 2010, which includes a number of provisions to control the growth of federal health care spending. There is a notable improvement in the long-term outlook under the Baseline Extended simulation, which assumes full implementation and effectiveness of cost control provisions.
I guess Frank Guinta didn't get the memo. Guinta claims to be focused on balancing the budget, but he never misses an opportunity to call for repealing healthcare reform. And he doesn't stop there. If can't eliminate it, he'll work to reduce its effectiveness.
“Procedurally, if it gets to the president’s desk and he vetoes it, the reality is that we don’t have the votes to override,” said Guinta. “So we’re going to have to work immediately after that to do three things: No. 1, reduce the cost of the overall bill. No. 2, eliminate the unconstitutional components of it. And No. 3, do what many people in this country wanted to see done in the first place, which is to reduce costs for employers and employees.”
So tell us Frank, how are you going to make up for the big budget hole that healthcare repeal will leave behind?
Who knew there are so many euphemisms for keeping the public's interests secret? If Judd Gregg is to be believed, "protect national security" and "preserve sovereign immunity" now have to be buttressed by "confidence," as in confidential deliberations to insure the "independence" of the Federal Reserve.
God forbid that the representatives of the people, assembled in Congress, might investigate how the Federal Reserve Bank manages our money and to whom it doles it out.
At least, that's what Gregg is reported to have said on the floor of the Senate in discussing the Vitter Amendment.
Over the last several months, I've made an effort to pay some attention to the United States Air Force as an institution that's very much involved in the continuing aggression on Iraq but whose activities are rarely covered on the evening news.
What I discovered was an organization that seems to have significant internal problems--a conclusion I reached on the basis of the fact that only a disfunctional organization would challenge budgetary allocations in public with the assertion that it would get the planes it wanted, regardless of what the civilian leadership considers prudent.