Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives
Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch
Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
John Lynch
Jennifer Daler
ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC
National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo
50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Nothing surprising here, since I've seen it used numerous times in party talking points, but for the record, it's official party strategy, as released to DiStaso from an NHDP internal memo, the "Incumbent Protection Program":
"When beginning any discussion, letter to the editor, or interview with a reporter, House members need to first frame the debate using the following terms:
'In these tough economic times, House Democrats have worked hard to create jobs and fix our economy without a broad-based tax.'"
Brunelle says that "voters care about representatives that are going to do everything they can to better our current economic conditions without implementing a broad-based tax. Thus far, the House Democratic Caucus has done just that. Also, if nothing else is printed in a newspaper other than our lead point, we win."
I look forward to a day, not realizable until, at a minimum, January 2013, when we win without taking a pledge from one of the most radical right-wing governors not only in New Hampshire, but American history.
Someday.
Adding: an interesting general question for state or national matters. If one's party controls the executive branch, does the party's strategy reflect the executive's policy? If policy began to shift on, say, Afghanistan, among the US House in sizable numbers away from POTUS, what does the DNC do?
"At a time when we need some private capital to provide economic stimulation, this is the answer," the Manchester Democrat [D'Allesandro] told his colleagues just after midnight yesterday after they voted 4-3 to support his plan to permit as many as 13,000 slot machines at the state's three horse and dog tracks - in Salem, Seabrook and Belmont - and in two yet-to-be-determined North Country locations.
House:
"The House position has been, over many years, consistently in opposition to gambling," said Rep. Marjorie Smith, a Durham Democrat and House Finance Committee leader. She will chair the House-Senate conference committee charged with negotiating a final version of the budget later this month.
Moreover, Smith said, she sees specific problems with D'Allesandro's plan: "The figures are not realistic. The language which is in the bill provides no oversight."
Souter & Meldrim:
When Rudman resigned from office a few years later, New Hampshire's Governor Meldrin Thompson appointed Souter to the top job. As attorney general for New Hampshire, Souter fought a gambling legalization movement in the state as well as protests against a nuclear power plant.
and more Souter and Meldrim:
Notoriously conservative, Thomson's at-times flailing ideological aggressiveness serves as a narrative foil to Souter's measured thoughtfulness, and nicely foreshadows Souter's relationship with his Supreme Court colleague, Justice Antonin Scalia. From the outset, Thomson and Souter squared off on state gambling, which Thomson supported and Souter did not, and on how to approach the activation of the Seabrook power plant, for which Thomson pushed hard in the face of Souter's concern that the state lacked an adequate evacuation plan in case of a meltdown.