NH Progressive Blogs
Betsy Devine
Citizen Keene
Democracy for NH
Equality Press
The Political Climate
Granite State Progress
Chaz Proulx
Susan the Bruce
NH Political Links
Graniteprof
Granite Status
Kevin Landrigan
NH Political Capital
Political Chowder (TV)
Political Chowder (AM)
PolitickerNH
Pollster (NH-Sen)
Portside with Burt Cohen
Bill Siroty
Swing State 2008
Campaigns, Et Alia.
Carol Shea-Porter
Paul Hodes
Jeanne Shaheen
Barack Obama (NH)
ActBlue Hampshire
Stop Sununu
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC
National
Bob Geiger
DailyKos
Digby
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talk Left
Talking Points Memo
50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
RSS Feed
Blue Hampshire RSS
Yes, there are actually two; but one is waning and one is waxing,
at least in terms of entries and comments in this space. At the risk of further confounding the situation, let me try to clarify.
I certainly don't begrudge anyone rah-rahing for their candidate, but when so many posts contain lengthy reiterations of the same well-known info, with no news or refinements, it seems like a lot of preaching to the choir (inevitably followed up by reverberating "Amen"s).
That's why I liked M. Caulfield's Dodd entry, since it collected and distilled so much to make his case. Both the H folks and (in particular) the O folks are repeating so much in multiple locations that they are causing me to feel less likely to consider their positions or even read their posts, which is no doubt counterproductive to their cause.
It's time for a change and I need a nap. Or is it the other way around?
Blue Hampshire RSS
I certainly don't begrudge anyone rah-rahing for their candidate, but when so many posts contain lengthy reiterations of the same well-known info, with no news or refinements, it seems like a lot of preaching to the choir (inevitably followed up by reverberating "Amen"s).
That's why I liked M. Caulfield's Dodd entry, since it collected and distilled so much to make his case. Both the H folks and (in particular) the O folks are repeating so much in multiple locations that they are causing me to feel less likely to consider their positions or even read their posts, which is no doubt counterproductive to their cause.
It's time for a change and I need a nap. Or is it the other way around?