About
A progressive online community for the Granite State. More...
Getting Started
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


The Masthead
Managing Editors

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
NH Progressive Blogs
Betsy Devine
Citizen Keene
Democracy for NH
Equality Press
The Political Climate
Granite State Progress
Chaz Proulx
Susan the Bruce

NH Political Links
Graniteprof
Granite Status
Kevin Landrigan
NH Political Capital
Political Chowder (TV)
Political Chowder (AM)
PolitickerNH
Pollster (NH-Sen)
Portside with Burt Cohen
Bill Siroty
Swing State 2008

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Carol Shea-Porter
Paul Hodes
Jeanne Shaheen
Barack Obama (NH)

ActBlue Hampshire
Stop Sununu
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Bob Geiger
DailyKos
Digby
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talk Left
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

RSS Feed

Blue Hampshire RSS


My misgivings about "Third Bush Term"
  1. There are a lot of voters who supported Bush in 2000 and/or 2004 who are reachable by Obama. If they have to say "Boy, I guess I screwed up" first - which a "Bush = BAD" theme demands - fewer of them will support him. We humans like to avoid confessing error - especially to ourselves.
  2. Talking about "the third Bush term" demands that the audience think about the 2008 election in terms of the past. That is in conflict with a call to the future.
  3. For voters who opposed Bush but are ready to support McCain, the "Third Bush Term" can be effective. But I don't think there are many such voters, and I think they can be reached more effectively with a positive message - or a strong anti-McCain message that finesses the question of whether he is a maverick and just shows that he is Wrong (on the economy, on Social Security, on minimum wage, on reproductive rights...)


Others have rated this comment as follows:
Alex Gallichon 4
Powered by: SoapBlox