About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Editors
Jennifer Daler
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe
William Tucker
The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Jennifer Daler

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Could Sarah Palin's Lie Block Ayotte's Path to Victory?

by: Dean Barker

Sat Jul 24, 2010 at 11:15:17 AM EDT


Tuck demolished the various falsehoods in Facebook Governor Sarah Palin's endorsement of Kelly Ayotte, and I've highlighted this particular one, but here is some more context from NARAL that is worth mentioning:
Her description of anti-choice Senate candidate Kelly Ayotte's record requires clarification. When endorsing Ayotte, Palin wrote that, as attorney general, Ayotte "battled all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court to protect the rights of New Hampshire parents - and won!" Well, that statement is a surprise to the Supreme Court justices who voted to send Ayotte's case back to a lower court. In short, she didn't win. She didn't even come close.

Furthermore, the law in question was repealed by a bipartisan coalition of lawmakers in New Hampshire about a year after Ayotte failed to make her case before the Supreme Court.

Of course, Sarah Palin's endorsement has nothing to do with principles or ideology and is all about Sarah Palin looking out for herself and her 2012 chances in key primary states.

But did Palin just hurt Kelly Ayotte's general election chances?

Ayotte's stridently anti-choice record and positions have taken a back seat for much of this race.  But Palin just put them front and center.

This might help Ayotte stave off Bill Binnie's momentum for the Republican primary, but it could seriously kneecap her chances against Paul Hodes if she makes it to nominee status.  And I say that leaving aside the net negative of a Palin endorsement per se among undeclared voters.

New Hampshire is a solidly pro-choice state.  How solidly?  In 2005, when SurveyUSA polled all fifty states on the "pro-life v. pro-choice" question, a whopping 67% of Granite Staters surveyed self-identified as "pro-choice".  Only Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Vermont had higher percentages than that.

It'll be interesting watching a nominee Ayotte try to thread that needle.  I don't think she can.

Dean Barker :: Could Sarah Palin's Lie Block Ayotte's Path to Victory?
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox