About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Editors
Jennifer Daler
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe
William Tucker
The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Jennifer Daler

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

NH-Sen: Could Turn-Out Decide This One?

by: Dean Barker

Wed Aug 25, 2010 at 06:27:23 AM EDT


WMUR:
Binnie hasn't been shy about bashing party Republicans as he runs on a fiscally conservative but socially moderate platform.

"It seems like his natural base might be moderate Republicans, those who want social issues to play a back seat. Perhaps pro-choice Republicans," Scala said. "The dilemma is, that's not enough voters to win a Republican primary on this state."

Sometimes I feel like there are two New Hampshires.  In my hunting grounds, away from the more populous southern tier, and the modern era Massachusetts Republicans who move there, Binnie is a natural fit for what remains of the old Yankee Republicans who have not moved over to the D column.

(It's funny he's on the other side of Judd Gregg, the progenitor of the Kelly Ayotte movement, since the two are not unlike.)

Ayotte went much further right than I expected her to.  But if turnout is higher than expected and more undeclareds pull R ballots, will it have been a colossal error?

Dean Barker :: NH-Sen: Could Turn-Out Decide This One?
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
My guess (0.00 / 0)
I suspect the radicalization of Republican Party has made the phenomenon of party-hopping independents a thing of the past.

Those few true believer voters among them who are at home with the tea party will become reliable Republican primary voters. The moderates will give up on the Grand Old Party altogether.

Negative campaigns are not designed to tip voters over to your candidate - they are designed to discourage your opponent's voters. The Republican snarling - much worse than the Kuster-Swett contest, but inconvenient for our "Dems in disarray" hacks - will result in a strongly contested but lightly attended Republican race.


Guilty as charged. :-) (0.00 / 0)

"... suspect the radicalization of Republican Party has made the phenomenon of party-hopping independents a thing of the past. Those few true believer voters among them who are at home with the tea party will become reliable Republican primary voters. The moderates will give up on the Grand Old Party altogether."

Now, if someone can convince Dan Eaton of this....


[ Parent ]
A natural fit? (4.00 / 1)
On what day did you happen to catch his position on social issues?

On Monday, or on Tuesday?

On "Marriage equality is great" day, or on "I believe marriage should only be for one man and one woman" day?

{continue pattern, and apply to every social issue...]


LOL. (0.00 / 0)
Yes!  Amended:

a natural fit, until the state establishment GOPer attempts to bury him forced him to lurch to the right on all kinds of culture war things.

birch paper


[ Parent ]
I'm Not A Fan Of Ovide Lamontagne (0.00 / 0)
...but I think he has a tremendous opening here.  He can hold on to a natural base and if he runs a smart campaign right after Labor Day, and I think he's run a smart campaign to this day, he could be the nominee.  He's a likable fella -- I've enjoyed him through the years too -- and he could pull it off.

He needs to make the subtle case that he's the only "unifying" Republican candidate who isn't injured, other than Jim Bender and Bender is a relative unknown with crazy ads.  Ovide can be considered "safe" for a lot of the Republicans who have been active in past years.  

Even still, all this is good for Paul Hodes who, if he works to define himself while the Republicans wrestle in mud, could walk right into the Senate in the short time between September 14th and November 2nd.  


Lamontagne (4.00 / 2)
is too far to the right for many Republicans. He's against abortion with NO exceptions. Presumably he'd force his own daughter to bear the child of her rapist - and presumably, if that fetus was a danger to her life, he'd let her die rather than abort it.

That transcends being conservative and veers off into the land of the Christian Taliban.

He's also interested in gutting Social Security.  


Being interested in gutting Social Security (0.00 / 0)
Do you know any Republican candidates who are NOT?

[ Parent ]
Hoping... (0.00 / 0)
That Bender and Lamontagne will try to tap the Tea Party for another Republican primary bloodbath and take out Ayotte from the right, or they drag her so far to the right that Binnie is able to do just what you're suggesting might happen.

It would certainly fit the pattern we've seen this year - Democrats aren't going after their own, but the Republican primary-attending core is massively unhappy with their own party leadership, rejecting establishment pick after establishment pick. Crist, Lowden, Bennett, Murkowski, Grayson, Specter, Norton - all Republican establishment-backed picks who would in all likelihood easily won their races (well, Lowden blew up on her own, and Bennett's seat is still a foregone conclusion to Mike Lee, and maybe Specter would've been weaker as a Republican after all).

Democrats need to be hanging Sharron Angle, Rand Paul, Ken Buck, Pat Toomey, Joe Miller, Marco Rubio, and the rest of the newly-dominant Overtly Crazy Wing of the Republican Party around every other Republican this year. You could call it a delegitimization strategy, but none of the teabagger candidates has any legitimacy outside their own lunatic circle of fringe supporters - you can see it in the way they all raced as fast as possible to scrub their records of their most outrageous positions as fast as they could.

Also, media, seriously, was 'Aqua Buddha' not entertaining enough to keep discussing?

Only the left protects anyone's rights.



Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox