About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors


Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe
William Tucker

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
John Lynch
Jennifer Daler

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Annie Kuster, Uniquely Unifying Shumaker and Helms

by: Dean Barker

Thu Sep 02, 2010 at 07:15:00 AM EDT


John DiStaso:
TAG TEAM. In 2007 and 2008, former ambassador and Democratic National Committeeman Terry Shumaker backed Hillary Clinton for President, while former state Democratic Chair Ned Helms backed Barack Obama.

...In an "open letter to New Hampshire Democrats" to be released before the end of the week, Helms and Shumaker say Kuster will bring "a new approach" to Washington.

They said she's right on the issues, particularly Iraq, Afghanistan, the Bush tax cuts and a woman's right to choose, and she has the better chance of keeping the seat Democratic.

I've secured a copy of former NHDP Chair Helms' and former DNC Committeeman Shumaker's letter.  It's really quite powerful. An excerpt:
We disagree with Charlie Bass on most issues.  But here is one thing we agree with him on:  If Democrats don't hold New Hampshire's second congressional district - a district that voted for Barack Obama by 13 points in 2008 - then our party is in serious trouble here in New Hampshire, and all across the country.

Dick and Katrina Swett have done tremendous work for New Hampshire Democrats over the years, and they deserve our respect.  But it is hard to ignore the fact that since 1980, New Hampshire has never had an election in which Charlie Bass or Dick or Katrina Swett were not running for something.  In 2010, voters have made it perfectly clear what they are looking for: a new approach in Washington.  Annie Kuster will bring just that.

Annie has built an unparalleled grassroots campaign, held over 100 house parties across the district, set records for her in-state fundraising support, and she promises to put people over politics-as-usual.  In contrast, Katrina Swett lost to Charlie Bass by 16 points the last time she took him on, has demonstrated relatively little grassroots support, and has relied almost entirely on out-of-state financial support to fund her campaign.

Full text of the letter below the fold.
Dean Barker :: Annie Kuster, Uniquely Unifying Shumaker and Helms
DEMOCRATS CAN'T AFFORD TO LOSE NH's SECOND DISTRICT

An Open Letter to New Hampshire Democrats by Ned Helms & Terry Shumaker

We disagree with Charlie Bass on most issues.  But here is one thing we agree with him on:  If Democrats don't hold New Hampshire's second congressional district - a district that voted for Barack Obama by 13 points in 2008 - then our party is in serious trouble here in New Hampshire, and all across the country.

Dick and Katrina Swett have done tremendous work for New Hampshire Democrats over the years, and they deserve our respect.  But it is hard to ignore the fact that since 1980, New Hampshire has never had an election in which Charlie Bass or Dick or Katrina Swett were not running for something.  In 2010, voters have made it perfectly clear what they are looking for: a new approach in Washington.  Annie Kuster will bring just that.

Annie has built an unparalleled grassroots campaign, held over 100 house parties across the district, set records for her in-state fundraising support, and she promises to put people over politics-as-usual.  In contrast, Katrina Swett lost to Charlie Bass by 16 points the last time she took him on, has demonstrated relatively little grassroots support, and has relied almost entirely on out-of-state financial support to fund her campaign.

There are big policy differences between these two candidates - Iraq, Afghanistan, the Bush tax cuts, a woman's right to choose, and more. Both of us support Annie because of her positions on the issues and her personal character.  But as campaign veterans, we also know that there is no way Democrats can afford to lose this seat, and we believe Annie gives us our best chance to win it.

As a candidate, Annie could have rested on her previous success as Co-Chair for Women for Obama, but she didn't seek that narrow path to victory.  She built a large tent, generating enthusiasm from every corner of our party (as the two of us can attest - Terry supported Secretary Clinton in the last primary; Ned supported President Obama).

Annie could have also focused only on her primary race against Katrina Swett, but instead, she built her entire campaign with an eye towards winning in November.  Annie hustled, and thanks to her deep New Hampshire ties and longstanding work in the state's charitable community, she has already won endorsements from prominent Independents and open-minded Republicans in every single corner of the district.  These include community leaders like former gubernatorial candidate Dr. Jim Squires in Hollis; Jim & Judy Putnam in Keene; Former GOP Senate President Ralph Hough in Lebanon; Former GOP State Rep. Liz Hager in Concord; Hillary Cleveland, wife of former Republican Congressman Jim Cleveland in New London; and Peter Powell in Lancaster, whose father served as a Republican Governor of the state.  The list goes on and on.

Combined with Annie's widespread support in the progressive community, this is what a winning coalition looks like.

Finally, Annie refuses to be typecast or pigeonholed.  She has endorsements from beer and wine drinkers alike, from the League of Conservation Voters to New Hampshire's Firefighters and Carpenters.  She is a strong voice in support of the public insurance option, and one of the reasons is because she is a frugal Yankee who knows the importance of reducing the deficit.  And she doesn't shy away from the fact that her parents were Republicans - or the fact that her mom had the independence to be a "Republican for Clinton" back in the 1990s.

We are reluctant to criticize our good friend Katrina Swett, so we will be brief: her campaign has been disappointing.  She has not done what she needed to do to show why voters will react differently to her in this contest than in her failed campaign in 2002, in which she underperformed Senator Shaheen's campaign that year by nearly 20 points. Like in 2002, every major pro-choice group has again declined to support her - a critical constituency that we simply cannot win without in November.  And notably, she made a serious blunder attacking Annie for her lobbying work when Katrina ran a lobbying firm herself ("Katrina Swett & Associates").

In contrast to Katrina, Annie has built an unparalleled, issues-based grassroots campaign - the kind it will take to win in the fall.  Already, a full majority of Democratic state lawmakers in the district have endorsed her in the primary.  She built her campaign on house parties and small-dollar contributions, and she's been more successful at it than anyone in recent memory.  When Annie says "people over politics" it isn't just a slogan - she is putting it into practice every day in her people-powered, home-grown  campaign and her cross-party support.  Annie offers the fresh face and new approach that we need to win in November, whether against a lifelong Washington insider like Charlie Bass or a Sarah Palin-hopeful like Jennifer Horn.

We can't afford to lose this race.  Annie Kuster has proven she is our strongest candidate. Let's get it right on September 14th.

Ned Helms served as Chair of the NH Democratic Party; Terry Shumaker, a former United States Ambassador, was a member of the Democratic National Committee.  Both men have lead numerous presidential and other campaigns in the Granite State.  

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Thank you Dean, Ned and Terry!! (0.00 / 0)

"We can't afford to lose this race" I volunteered and contributed at least 250.for Dick Swett's 1996 Senate run,and worked for Katrina's 2002 run as a paid 'in state' fundraiser for a month, before I quit. It was clear to me then that she was not working smart,and would not win. It is and clearer now, that Katrina is not the best candidate to hold Paul Hodes seat. Charlie beat her soundly once, and with her stratospheric net negatives in the general she will be a drag on the whole ticket. To back this up

http://publicpolicypolling.blo...

"Although she is the best known candidate for now because of her family name and prior run,Democrats may be better off nominating someone other than Swett.29% of voters in the district have an unfavorable opinion of her to only 19% who view her positively.Bass isn't amazingly popular either with 35% of voters holding a favorable opinion of him to 34% with a negative one."



Annie 2012!

Process Critique: "Hustle" or "Blunder" (4.00 / 2)
There is no joy in criticizing the candidate that your friends passionately support. But there is a responsibility to fully vet the choices. For me, it has been easier to focus on process related concerns. Above, the Helms/Schumaker letter gives you plenty to consider. For me, this contrast stands out.

Annie could have also focused only on her primary race against Katrina Swett, but instead, she built her entire campaign with an eye towards winning in November.  Annie hustled,...

vs.
And notably, she made a serious blunder attacking Annie for her lobbying work when Katrina ran a lobbying firm herself ("Katrina Swett & Associates").

To put it bluntly, I am not impressed with the Swett campaign.

I first met Annie, at the suggestion of Jon Bresler, in April of 2009. We put together a small clutch of NH activists concerned with veterans and military families issues. At this point, Annie was simply listening to folks, sizing up a run for Congress. She was empathetic and engaging. I came away comfortable with her. As she had a demeanor of someone who takes things seriously, but doesn't take herself too seriously. Knowing how voters respond to candidates, how they reject anyone they see as pompous or fake, my campaign instinct immediately liked the "package." I knew voters would, too.

But it was early. I needed more to go on. I put my ear to the ground.

Early, there was talk about potential candidates, from Katrina Swett to Deb Pignatelli. Things were "frozen" to a certain extent during this time. Politicians, activists and people of interest were measuring the field. Annie stayed on course. I could sense to trajectory she aiming at November 2010. The groundgame was on. Steady. Consistent.

In June 2009, I attended a house party hosted by Latha and Krishna Mangipudi. By this time Annie had attracted Kari Thurman to join her team. Kari had previously worked with Carol Shea Porter, so this development was highly regarded by those that notice such things. At the house party, my instincts were confirmed. Annie was, I was sure, a great choice to represent the people of NH-02. Though I had made my choice, the field was not established.

From June '09, on; Annie worked steadily building grassroots support. Would be candidates stayed out, limiting the field to DeJoie, Fernald, Kuster & Swett. Though Swett waivered in committing, she managed the expectations game, effectively keeping herself in. Plus, as many would note, 'she has all that money.' Annie stayed on course.

By winter of 2009 and on, things were in full swing. The grassroots buzzed, as Annie traveled, reaching out, humbly. We, post-Coakley, now know that it is all about "hustle."  Annie was already moving. Her ground game was solid. She was building a campaign network that was excited and savvy to NH politics.

As the campaign has worn on, it has been a joy to see support for Annie bloom. Because as the field diminished, the more evident it became that Annie is the best choice to serve the people of NH-02. This week, I attended the last two events of the Annie's 4 day Main Street Jobs Tour.
I commented:

This campaign is a groundpounder. The staff covers the bases. They work. They push through challenges. They bring it.

Annie has grace. She connects.


Hustle.

Annie's campaign manager, Colin Van Ostern, noted

I thought I'd share a glimpse into how hard she is campaigning because I think it tells something about what kind of a congresswoman she will be.

Most assuredly!

The trajectory to November is built, solid and enthusiastic. This race will be won on the ground. Charlie Bass is staying aloof, hoping that he can swoop down from 10,000 feet with a savage TV air war, to take this thing.

So did Martha Coakley. That was a blunder.

Whack-a-mole, anyone?


Hustle and Flow! n/t (0.00 / 0)


Annie 2012!

[ Parent ]
Martha who? n/t (4.00 / 1)


Republicans believe government is bad - then they get into office and prove it.

[ Parent ]

Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox