About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editor
Mike Hoefer

Editors
elwood
susanthe
William Tucker
The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
New Hampshire Labor News
Chaz Proulx: Right Wing Watch

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes

Campaigns, Et Alia.
NH-Gov
- Maggie Hassan
NH-01
- Andrew Hosmer
- Carol Shea-Porter
- Joanne Dowdell
NH-02
- Ann McLane Kuster

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Kuster Campaign Statement & Fact Sheet on Bass' Ethics Issues

by: neilsroka

Thu Oct 14, 2010 at 16:01:51 PM EDT


(Moved the fact sheet after the jump, but be sure to check it out - promoted by Laura Clawson)

In response to the story Kevin Landrigan broke in this AM's Telegraph and Dean wrote up here early today, Kuster Campaign Manager Colin Van Ostern released the following statement about Congressman Bass' growing ethics issues:

"Even by Congressman Bass's own questionable account, he used his office to promote his nephew's company - then got rewarded with over $500,000 worth of his company's stock just days after leaving office, in a private deal not available to the public.  

No matter how loudly Congressman Bass denies it, the fact is that the company's own press clippings in 2006  credited him personally with setting up a one-on-one meeting between the company president and the U.S. Secretary of Energy, specifically to promote the company and urge funding for tax credits to help it.

That is what is wrong with Washington, and Bass's doubtful denials leave a lot of questions unanswered."

The campaign also released a fact sheet documenting the issues.

Full Disclosure: The author is the Kuster campaign's Communications Director

neilsroka :: Kuster Campaign Statement & Fact Sheet on Bass' Ethics Issues


***FACT SHEET***

Bass used his office as U.S. Congressman to profit his nephew's business, from whom he got millions in private stock not available to the public.

In 2005 & 2006, Congressman Bass wrote and successfully passed a law that created tax credits "ideally suited" to benefit a wood pellet company owned by his nephew.  Bass even personally arranged a meeting between his nephew and the U.S. Secretary of Energy to lobby for funding the tax credit and promote the company (which Bass now denies, despite pictures and an article about it from the time).

As he was helping this company, Bass bought himself between $500k - $1M  worth of the company stock in a private sale not open to the general public. Bass now insists this happened in the days after he left office, despite the original disclosure forms that actually list the sale in January and November of 2006, before he left office.  But even by his own account, Bass made millions from his nephew's company that he lobbied for as Congressman. Today the stock is worth between $1 - $5 million.

KEY FACTS:

*** New England Wood Pellet President Steve Walker is Congressman Bass's niece's husband. [Union Leader, May 12, 2005]

*** Bass personally introduced legislation to create a 25% tax credit for renewable fuel home heating systems, which was included in the 2005 Bush Energy bill. [Bass Press Release, April 14, 2005]

*** This tax credit was described by the company as "ideally suited" to benefit them. [Pellet Fuels Institute Newsletter, March 2006]

*** Bass personally arranged a meeting between NEWP President and the U.S. Secretary of Energy to lobby for funding for this tax credit and to promote the company.  [Pellet Fuels Institute Newsletter, March 2006]

*** Bass purchased between $500,000 - $1,000,000 of NEWP stock in a private sale not available to the public. [Bass U.S. House Financial Disclosure, Filed 3/9/07.  Purchase of stock listed as "1/06" and "11/06".  Bass now claims he meant 2007, though the form was filed in March of 2007, making the November date completely nonsensical.]

*** Bass announced he was joining the board of directors of NEWP ten days after leaving Congress. [Bloomberg, January 14, 2007]

*** In the year after he left Congress, his NEWP stock roughly doubled in value, to $1 - $5M total. [Bass Personal Financial Disclosure, Filed 5/3/09.  Stock was worth $1-5M in 2008 but no new shares were purchased in 2008 or 2009.]

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
"Charlie Bass, GOP Candidate, Could Face Ethics Probe Upon Election" (4.00 / 1)
Huffington Post front page:


The late-campaign airing of allegations of ethical misconduct in the race for an open New Hampshire House seat could produce the rare spectacle of a member of Congress facing an ethics investigation shortly after entering office.

On Thursday morning, the Nashua Telegraph published a fairly damning story about former Congressman Charlie Bass (R-N.H.) who is running for his old seat, currently held by Senatorial candidate Paul Hodes (D-N.H.). According to the paper, Bass helped set up a business meeting benefiting a New Hampshire wood pellet company at the same time that he held $500,000 worth of privately held stock in that company. Days after Bass left office in January 2007, he took a position on that company's board.

The former congressman told the paper that he had inadvertently listed the stock holding. He did not buy the shares until after he was defeated by Hodes.

Bass said he first inquired about buying stock after the election in November 2006 and the New England Wood Pellet's Board of Managers approved selling shares to Bass in January 2007.

"I only acquired the stock after serving in Congress," Bass said during a telephone interview. "There is nothing wrong with getting into the business after I got out of office and that's just what I did."

Bass said he has the stock certificates to prove the purchase of stock in January 2007 and not a year earlier.

The article sets up a fairly tricky political situation for the former congressman, who had seem poised to reclaim his old seat. On a strictly ethical matter it's a bit simpler, experts say. Forms should exist detailing when, exactly, Bass purchased the stock. And should he end up being elected to Congress, the House Ethics Panel would have a fairly straightforward case in demanding that information.

"I don't know what the truth is. If he held the stock at the time it is a conflict if he didn't, it's not. I don't know the answer. He did schedule the meeting, it seemed like it was on his financial disclosure at the time. It seems like he is changing his tune," said Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.

"If he held the stock, it is like the situation with [Rep.] Maxine Waters [the California Democrat accused of setting up meetings to help a bank where her husband owned hundreds of thousands of dollars in stock.]

"If he wins the election then certainly given the personal financial disclosure forms, which indicate he did hold the stock, the ethics committee would have reasons to investigate the matter."

CREW itself can't call for an investigation because the incident involving Bass falls under the jurisdiction of the House panel alone. The newly established Office of Congressional Ethics, an independent ethics body, can look into events that took place only after March 2008 (when it was established). But if Sloan is right, and the House panel does look into Bass' case, it could set a land-speed record for a member finding himself or herself in formal ethics limbo.

"It is pretty unusual," said Mary Boyle, vice president for communications at the good government group, Common Cause.

"I can't name, off the top of my head, the last member [who faced an investigation upon entering office], or if there was a previous one. But it would certainly be unusual upon entering congress and being sworn in to have this happen. Keep in mind how the committee works. It is a slow moving process... we have an ethics committee that is not anxious to jump into thing."

"But there are allegations worth investigating in the story," Boyle added. "And the best and most definitive way to deal with them is through the House Ethics Committee."



Ha! (4.00 / 1)
Go NH!

The late-campaign airing of allegations of ethical misconduct in the race for an open New Hampshire House seat could produce the rare spectacle of a member of Congress facing an ethics investigation shortly after entering office.

If we don't defeat Bass and Guinta, we could be looking at TWO special elections.

birch paper; on Twitter @deanbarker


[ Parent ]
Bass ? Ethics ? n/t (0.00 / 0)


note to close readers: this might be sarcastic so think twice before reading to candidates for use in their attacks on each other


Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox