About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors


Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe
William Tucker

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
John Lynch
Jennifer Daler

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

"Campaigns Don't Matter"

by: Dean Barker

Sun Nov 07, 2010 at 18:59:12 PM EST


You hear that every now and then from the Gatekeepers.

Hogwash.

One thing I learned over and over again this cycle: when the wind is not at your back, campaigns matter.

Yes, there are all kinds of factors in play, some national, some systemic, some quite shallow.  There was the avalanche of pro-GOP money on the TeeVee, radio, and in our mailboxes, directed at some candidates more than others.  And the candidate herself or himself is of great importance, of course.

But campaigns matter. How nimble they are, how aggressive they are, how grassroots they are, how they raise money, how they cultivate relationships to old and new media, the expenditure decisions they make at critical moments, and most importantly, how they define the candidate and the message to voters.

I'd take more wins over knowing this any day of the week, but again, the lesson pounded into me over and over this cycle was that in an uphill climb, campaigns matter.

Dean Barker :: "Campaigns Don't Matter"
Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I get no kick from campaign (4.00 / 4)
Mere alcohol
doesn't thrill me at all...

Campaign
Don't hurt me baby
Cocaine
Don't drive me crazy
Ain't nobody's business
If I do...

Sorry - still drunch punk...


No, no,no,no I don't ..phonebank no more (4.00 / 4)
I'm tired of waking up on the floor.
No thank you, please
It only makes me sneeze
and then it makes it hard to find the door.

Apologizes to Hoyt Axton.

Whack-a-mole, anyone?

[ Parent ]
Hoyt wrote that? (0.00 / 0)
Ringo charted it.

Hoyt is Woodie Guthrie's cousin, IIRC.

My favorite Hoyt lyric:

You work your fingers to the bone -
What do you get??








BONY FINGERS.


[ Parent ]
Who said that? (0.00 / 0)
That's absurd, of course campaigns matter.

As noted in my pox thread, though, I do think the last two Congresses could have made it easier on us.


Well, when one side is aiming to serve and the other side is (0.00 / 0)
aiming to enslave, a couple of months of campaigning aren't likely to secure a win.  The slavers are always more ruthless.
Our private corporations perceive themselves to be in a contest with our public corporations.  So, it's important to them that the officials in those public corporations are either lackeys of the private folk or incompetent, or both.

The party of 'no' is not a happenstance.  It was created by design by people who are opposed to public anything.  More specifically, they object most vehemently to having their "liberties" curtailed.  Which, by the way, both the health insurance reform agenda and the bank reform bill accomplish, when and if they are properly implemented.  

The mechanism for curtailment is somewhat different in each case.  Health insurers are subject to state by state review of services rendered and revenue collected.  I think that in this they are similar to how energy companies are supervised by state utilities commissions.  The banks fall under the purview of federal supervision and, as Warren Stephens told us, the 250 provisions in Dodd/Frank is giving the financial industry major trouble.  The notion that the bills will be rescinded is a hopeless ploy that's designed to disguise the effort to suborn the regulators directly -- a ploy that's not likely to work either if calls from Congressmen are regularly reported.

Letting the states handle some matters and leaving others to the feds is actually a clever strategy.  It means the private corporate entities will have to fight on many fronts.


Win or Loose: Campaigns make a moral statement (0.00 / 0)
This is a big subject.

Often doing the right thing ( for instance how you raise money for instance ) is not rewarded by our voting public. (Most people don't have a clue how money works in politics)

Same with changing pubic policy on gay marriage, the environment, energy and of course health care.

But if you don't go to corporations for money and you do stand up for what's right during a campaign you will always hold your head high.

In the end that's what's important--and why Democrats will be back when the dust settles.



Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox