About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editor
Mike Hoefer

Editors
elwood
susanthe
 William Tucker
The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes

Campaigns, Et Alia.
NH-01
- Andrew Hosmer
- Carol Shea-Porter
- Joanne Dowdell
NH-02
- Ann McLane Kuster

Special Elections
- Strafford 03Bob Perry
- Hills 03Peter Leishman

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Walker's Roadmap

by: Jennifer Daler

Fri Feb 25, 2011 at 17:20:05 PM EST
This chart is from a great piece by Mike Konczal that takes readers through Walker's three way plan for realizing the so-called conservative agenda at the state level. This plan is not unique to Wisconsin, but is being attempted by other GOP dominated state governments. Luckily it is meeting with resistance.

Photobucket

h/t Joan McCarter
Jennifer Daler :: Walker's Roadmap
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Walker's Roadmap | 3 comments
Private corporations, even though they are creatures of public (0.00 / 0)
corporations, perceive themselves to be in competition with their progenitors and, not unlike some humans, contemplate patricide.  Their rationale seems to be that they do not want to be controlled.  But, since most state controls are minimal, this seems to be a preemptive stance which, I would argue, should lead us to consider that stricter controls are indeed called for.
Why do we grant charters to artificial bodies which undermine the welfare of society and engage in blatantly anti-social behavior? It's like breeding an attack dog.  Oh, wait, we do that too.  
Anyway, a dog that bites the hand that feeds it is not worth keeping. Our corporations, even when they masquerade as family enterprises, need to be subject to stricter controls.
Kind of awesome (0.00 / 0)
I don't have other words for it. Wish I did.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm (0.00 / 0)
GOP and Koch bros against the American worker
CAN YOU SPELL CLASS WARFARE?
Walker's Roadmap | 3 comments

Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox