About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editor
Mike Hoefer

Editors
elwood
susanthe
William Tucker
The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes

Campaigns, Et Alia.
NH-01
- Andrew Hosmer
- Carol Shea-Porter
- Joanne Dowdell
NH-02
- Ann McLane Kuster

Special Elections
- Strafford 03Bob Perry
- Hills 03Peter Leishman

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Dizzying Costs

by: Jennifer Daler

Thu Mar 03, 2011 at 17:31:42 PM EST


Well, the House Republican leadership held a press conference in Concord yesterday to congratulate themselves on the great job they are doing. Never mind the fact that they've been criticized from the get-go by the editorial pages of the  Union Leader, the Nashua Telegraph, and the Concord Monitor. Being referred to as an asylum can't be a good thing.

The House is priding itself on its fiscal conservatism, but many of the bills that are going through (or are they? Are they being retained? recommitted?)will cost the state millions of dollars. Just where that money is supposed to come from is a question we should all be asking, especially since services for the elderly, disabled, young children, the mentally ill are being eviscerated.

But we do have money to end our participation in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, which will not lower anybody's electric bill, but would cost the state $12 million in revenue.

The new parental notification bill will cost the state $200,000 a year in judicial by-pass hearings according to NHCLU executive director Clare Ebel. That doesn't count the cost to the state of defending the bill in court when the inevitable lawsuit comes. The last one cost the state $300k in a payout to Planned Parenthood, not counting the hours the AG's office spent defending it all the way to the US Supreme Court.

The bill to demand food stamp recipients be urine tested will cost between $3,526,380 and $7,411,140 annually according to the fiscal note on the bill. The fiscal note also says "catching" people will not save the state one penny because food stamps are a federally funded program.

Then we have to bill to force Attorney General Michael Delaney to join a lawsuit against the Affordable Care Act. That will also wind up in court if it passes, as will the case against Manchester Democratic State Rep Michael Brunelle.

HB176, the bill to disenfranchise student voters will also wind up in court if it passes, as will many, many more.

HB590 is a study bill, however, it would say the NH House declares federal grants to be unconstitutional and a committee would be set up to study this and make further recommendations. I suppose it doesn't occur to the new majority that NH taxpayers are also US taxpayers and are due some benefits from that.

The irony is that while Speaker O'Brien is saying we have to cut $50 million immediately from the budget, all these expenditures are okay with him. As long as no public money goes to the health, education or welfare of citizens, no amount is too much for the new majority.  

Jennifer Daler :: Dizzying Costs
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Dizzying Costs | 5 comments
Insane. (4.00 / 1)
This group guided by Boss O'Brien are just plain nuts.  They ran on a platform of reducing budgets etc, but what they've done is nothing more than institute a 1960s John Birch Society agenda that makes NH not only a joke around the nation in league with AZ and Palin's Alaska.  2012 can't come soon enough.

there are 2 bills (4.00 / 1)
to expand the death penalty - HB 147 sponsored by O'Brien himself. The fiscal note points out that a capital case could cost in excess of $2.5 million a year. HB 162 would make most every murder a capital murder. The fiscal note points out that the cost of defending a capital case is in excess of $1 million.

This legislature would use our tax dollars to kill people AND deny food to hungry children. It seems we're long past the era of "compassionate" conservatives.  


Bankrupt city and towns (0.00 / 0)
Today Nanny O'Brien proposed a constitutional amendment that will remove the state from any obligation to provide any educational aid to cities and towns:

The amendment reads "the general court shall have the authority and full discretion" to define reasonable standards and "to mitigate local disparities."

Full authority means they don't have to do a thing.  This puts us back to pre-Claremont, and shifts the entire burden of education back to the municipalities.  A decade of progress in education is about to be undone. But you know what? I don't think this amendment would be passed by the voters.  I think that they are starting to realize what a bait and switch job the Republican leadership engaged in.

http://www.unionleader.com/art...    



"When you get to the end of your rope, tie a knot and hang on."  Franklin D. Roosevelt    


Numbers count (4.00 / 2)
I think this is a really effective way to show the hypocrisy of the Legislature. Not only are they discouraging economic development by trashing education, infrastructure, etc., but their clear focus on social issues is ultimately going to cost the State a lot.  Adding up the numbers in a way that people can understand is the way to go. The Republicans will no longer be able to hide behind their own numbers.

You don't get it. It's the thought that counts. (4.00 / 1)
Voting for bills that are sure to get vetoed is a freebie.  
Down in Georgia it's the same story.  Paul Broun, the fellow who didn't know how to respond to an impudent question about the President's future, is sending out messages touting that he "saved" one hundred billion dollars.  Too bad the Senate vetoed it.  He tried.  And he'll try and try again and ride that failed effort to another term.
However, he's got an interesting list of what constitutes "waste" in his mind.

100 federal programs dealing with surface transportation issues totaling $58 billion annually.  
82 federal programs monitoring teacher quality totaling $4 billion.  
80 federal programs for economic development totaling $6.5 billion.
47 federal programs for job training totaling $18 billion.
20 federal offices or programs devoted to homelessness totaling $2.9 billion.
17 different federal grant programs for disaster preparedness totaling $34 billion.
15 federal agencies or offices handle food safety totaling $1.6 billion.
5 agencies or offices are working to ensure the federal government uses less gasoline.
At least 5 departments, 8 agencies and more than 24 presidential appointees oversee programs related to bioterrorism totaling $6.48 billion.

Why are grants to the states a waste?  Because they bypass the outstretched palms of the investors in bonds--i.e. no trickle-down for the financiers.


Dizzying Costs | 5 comments

Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox