About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editor
Mike Hoefer

Editors
elwood
susanthe
William Tucker
The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
New Hampshire Labor News
Chaz Proulx: Right Wing Watch

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes

Campaigns, Et Alia.
NH-Gov
- Maggie Hassan
NH-01
- Andrew Hosmer
- Carol Shea-Porter
- Joanne Dowdell
NH-02
- Ann McLane Kuster

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

NH House Cuts Would Decimate Social Safety Net

by: William Tucker

Wed Mar 16, 2011 at 06:00:00 AM EDT


Elaine Grant, NHPR, examines the impact the House Finance Committee's proposed Health and Human Services budget would have on the Granite State's social safety net.

The House Finance Committee has proposed cuts that would decimate the budgets of hospitals, community health centers, mental health centers and other organizations that make up the social safety net.
"We did a quick assessment of how many patients would lose their health care as a result of those reductions, and we estimate that's going to be close to 12,000 patients."

The cuts would be felt keenly in the North Country, where community health centers provide the only primary care in Berlin and Gorham.

And they’ll hurt low-income children in Manchester. In addition to its broad-based cuts, the House Finance Committee has proposed eliminating $75,000 that goes directly to Child Health Services in Manchester. CHS serves 2500 children and teenagers, most of whom live in poverty. ... And that means 500 to 800 kids would lose their medical care.
William Tucker :: NH House Cuts Would Decimate Social Safety Net

While GOP lawmakers point to the state's budget shortfall as justification for the draconian cuts, Mark Fernald counters that previous Legislatures would have looked for new revenue sources to maintain basic services.

The current budget crisis is not due to runaway spending; it’s due to a huge drop in revenues. State tax revenues decreased more than 9 percent in 2009 and have yet to re-cover.

In the past, the Legislature would have tinkered with state taxes to maintain state services. Not this Legislature.

The majority party adheres to an ideology that no part of government is so important as to justify any change in our revenue structure. If revenues do not meet needs, then needs will not be met.

Measuring state and local taxes as a percentage of personal income, New Hampshire has the second lowest level of taxation in the country.

We are better than this.

Cross-posted
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Marty Harty (4.00 / 3)
may be gone in body, but his spirit lives on in the NH House.

No Misteak (4.00 / 1)
Just don't think that Republicants feel sorry or are surprised. This is exactly what they have wanted to do all along. Feeling sorry is what they will do down the line when they see that the average 401k owned by someone over 55 contains about $27,000 - well, that was before the crash.

I wonder how many jobs this will create? (4.00 / 3)
Oh, wait...

It gets better (4.00 / 1)
Concerned that Republicans may be accused of downshifting welfare costs to the towns, Rep. Kirk is submitting an amendment which will end the towns obligation to provide for people in need.

Under current state law, any person who is poor and unable to support himself "shall be relieved and maintained at the expense of the town or city of residence." A draft of Kurk's amendment would add the phrase "within the limits of funds appropriated by the town or city for public assistance." That means cities and towns would no longer be obligated to support anyone who is needy. Rather, they would only have to spend whatever money the city or town appropriates for welfare.

VoilĂ , no downshifting.

Can someone explain to me why, if they love the Constitution so much, the right-wingers keep introducing amendments to change it?


What it all boils down to is a rejection of obligation. Anti-socials resent (4.00 / 1)
social obligations.  What they think they prefer is the existence of the predator which, since they have survived so long, they assume works for them.  That they wouldn't have survived if a host of humans hadn't met their social obligations doesn't register because, by and large, they are not aware.  
The military places a high priority on what they call "situational awareness."  It means that the person is aware of his/her surroundings, including, of course, other people.  That it's a high priority suggests that people not being aware is a recognized problem. Moreover, once you start looking for it, it's easy to notice when it's not there.  And that it's often not there.
It seems that anti-social people make good political candidates, especially when politicians are wanted as "fronts," BECAUSE they don't notice how people, whom they are unaware of, respond to them. They're tools, in more ways than one.

More care must be taken to not elect people who look like us, because, as we now know without a doubt, appearances are deceiving.


[ Parent ]
in comes the blind commissioner (4.00 / 1)
they got him in a trance

someone says you're in the wrong place my friend , you'd better leave
(fucking told you so)

note to close readers: this might be sarcastic so think twice before reading to candidates for use in their attacks on each other


yet (4.00 / 4)
they want to spend $7 million to make poor people pee into cups, and unknown millions to execute a single person.

This is GOP Siberia. Martin Harty just said it out loud.  


Worth noting that Grant reports that (0.00 / 0)
the business community is strongly opposed to this.  Faustian bargain, indeed.

In the immediate aftermath of Since the start of the financial crisis, the Fed/Treasury lent, spent, or guaranteed $28 $29 trillion to save the banking system.

Reducing unemployment (4.00 / 1)
One way, or another.

Upon further consideration, I don't think anti-social is (4.00 / 1)
necessarily correct.  Although these mean-spirited people seem anti-social, it's likely that they are asocial, either lacking in the social genes or otherwise deficient.  So, it's perhaps more accurate to classify them as
Social Awareness Deficient = SAD

The result, of course, is a sad excuse for some  legislators in NH, a sad excuse for a governor in Wisconsin and Michigan and, previously, Alaska, and a whole host of sad excuses in Congress.  


It Is Just Sickening... (4.00 / 1)
...that the right-wingers don't care at all about healing.  They're more concerned about possibly saving a few dollars on taxes for gamblers and tourists and corporations than caring for basic health services for our residents.  

The "American Dream" isn't just for the rich and well-to-do."  At least, it shouldn't be.  


Awesome Fiscal Policy Institute link. (0.00 / 0)
I did not realize this existed.

And, as bad as decimating our social safety net is, it's an even worse idea during a recession. (But macroeconomics is a lie, unless it suggests cutting taxes.)

Be fiscally responsible: nhecon.blogspot.com



Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox