About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editor
Mike Hoefer

Editors
elwood
susanthe
William Tucker
The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
New Hampshire Labor News
Chaz Proulx: Right Wing Watch

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes

Campaigns, Et Alia.
NH-Gov
- Maggie Hassan
NH-01
- Andrew Hosmer
- Carol Shea-Porter
- Joanne Dowdell
NH-02
- Ann McLane Kuster

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

New Meme Emerging: Government is Good, We Need Taxes

by: susaninrindge

Fri Apr 08, 2011 at 17:08:43 PM EDT


The article from NHBR that Lucy Weber brought to our attention is filled with quotes of skepticism, fear and outrage from the business community. It turns out that maybe government has an important role in helping businesses after all.

The focus of the demonstrations last week was on cuts to human services and union-busting; it's nice to hear business owners joining the chorus, a mix of outrage, panic and befuddlement.

Just a couple examples taken from the article:
The House budget calls for deep cuts to the state's tourism budget. Hotels and restaurants  fear that without the State doing marketing, they will lose business.

Contractors will be hurt by the $30 cut to vehicle registration because there will be $90M less for highway improvements and the long-delayed Route 93 improvement project. Car dealers think the cuts will delay inspections and issuance of titles.

Real estate is unhappy about the inevitable cost shifting to cities and towns and the inevitable rise in property taxes.

Business & Industry Assoc of NH says cuts in Medicaid will increase the cost (to businesses) of private health insurance premiums.

There are many more interesting examples of the apprehension over this budget within the business community  

But something else struck me reading this article. Government is actually helping businesses. Government is not just here to deliver services to the "needy" and "get in the way of business."  With taxes and fees, government is able to do what small businesses cannot do for themselves.  Marketing NH cannot be done effectively by a single restaurant or hotel. Government has done this and business people don't seem to want government to stop doing it. And finding new markets around the world cannot be done effectively by single business.

The complaints and concerns of business over this budget mean that our government has been effective. That while everyone screams about taxes, they are getting something valuable in return. When the taxes are removed, they worry about the benefits they will lose, the benefits they know they cannot provide for themselves.

Businesses don't want to lose the marketing, R&D, education and training the workforce, providing infrastructure, incentives for innovation, incentives for conservation.

We are seeing state and federal government  mercilessly and callously stripped of resources. Maybe some of it is necessary. But could it be that in this process of losing so much we have taken for granted, that we will begin to see its value and fight to keep as much of it as we can? Even if it means we pay TAXES!

susaninrindge :: New Meme Emerging: Government is Good, We Need Taxes
Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
People who have no sense of sequence, do not perceive (0.00 / 0)
consequences. It's my sense that they have expectations (wishes), but, since they don't register experiences, their expectations are largely unsatisfied.  It isn't that they don't get what they expected or don't avoid what they feared; it's that, from their perspective, nothing happens.  There are no consequences and no effects.  That tree falling in the forest simply isn't noticed.
Conservatives exist in an ineffable present.  They don't like change because they don't see it. It's strange, but people directed by superficial optics seem not to perceive change. A light is red or a light is green. That there's a program which controls that doesn't occur to them. Just as it didn't occur to traffic engineers, who see stop lights as tools to keep traffic moving smoothly, that the settings should provide sufficient time for a pedestrian to cross the street.
Some business persons perceive the public corporations as having monopolies.  They'd like to have monopolies.  So, they view public corporations with jealousy and argue that, if they had the monopoly, they could be more successful. What they don't realize is that public corporations largely deliver goods and services the recipients need, but don't necessarily want.  And because they don't want them, they're reluctant to pay for them.  Moreover, when public corporations are successful in delivering services people need, but don't want, then the need actually decreases. Which then prompts the people who didn't want them in the first place to argue they should pay less.  And that's where we run into problems. Because, if we don't anticipate need and work to prevent it (which costs time and labor), then the need will turn up as a catastrophe.
Of course, people who don't perceive consequences, can't anticipate either.  Putting them in charge of public corporations is a disaster. Republicans are to blame for that.

Which reminds me that it was John Lynch who reappointed the Attorney General and sent her on the road to Washington as our Senator. One of the primary drawbacks of various forms of irrelevant discrimination is that really incompetent individuals get promoted either to deny the discrimination or provide the exception that proves the rule.  Clarence Thomas is a good example. It is tempting to argue that incompetents also deserve to be represented, but that argument does not serve us well in the long run.
The selection of Clarence Thomas was a shameful act. But then, not long after, the Congress passed DADT.


This budget makes connections very tangible (0.00 / 0)
It will be harder for us all to maintain the disconnect between government and quality of life/business after this budget. It may really force us to start seeing what life is like without gov't protection and support. It's not going to be pretty, and it may be too late, but harsh reality may do what all the rhetoric cannot.

""Hope is the dream of a soul awake.""

/French Proverb quotes.



[ Parent ]

Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox