About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editor
Mike Hoefer

Editors
elwood
susanthe
William Tucker
The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Jennifer Daler

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

The Founders of New Hampshire would not join This Tea Party

by: Mark Fernald

Sat May 14, 2011 at 13:50:39 PM EDT


(Welcome to BH Mark, would love to have you post your weekly emails here! - promoted by Mike Hoefer)

The Founders of New Hampshire would not join This Tea Party

The faction now controlling the Republican Party and the New Hampshire House is driven by the so-called "tea party" ideology. It is an ideology the founders of New Hampshire would have rejected.

The settlers of New Hampshire were, for the most part, devout; they believed for philosophical and religious reasons that they ought to care for the needy. They understood this to be an obligation of individuals and of society as a whole.

Colonial New Hampshire adopted laws to assist paupers. To understand the attitudes of the day, consider what the New Hampshire Supreme Court said in 1836 when two towns argued over who was responsible for a poor family, and whether aid was properly given:

"But when a man, with a house and a little real estate, is, by sickness, or other accident, reduced to want, he is not to be compelled to sell his house and clothing, and turn himself and family out of doors, sick and naked, in order to entitle him and his family to relief."

From the start, New Hampshire made the bold statement that we are a community, and that no one will be left destitute.

The application of this law was by no means perfect. A common practice was to put care for the poor out to bid. The farmer who was willing to board the poor for the lowest cost per day was awarded the contract. This may sound harsh, but life in New Hampshire in the 1700's was barely above subsistence, particularly in the rural areas. Caring for the destitute often meant lifting them up only to the level of subsistence.

Over time, 'selling the poor to the lowest bidder' gave way to town farms, which gave way to county farms. Today, county farms have been replaced by state programs to serve our neediest citizens: Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, Aid to the Totally and Permanently Disabled, Aid to the Blind, and others.

"Welfare" is not something invented during the New Deal of President Franklin Roosevelt or the Great Society of President of Johnson; it is older than the 13 colonies. New Hampshire is a community which has always been committed to caring for the needy. Our state's social programs are not creeping socialism, or any other "ism;" they are a part of a centuries-old New Hampshire tradition.

This tradition is under attack. The budget passed by the New Hampshire House would literally throw people "out of doors, sick and naked." Over 7,000 people would be cut from the State program for poor, uninsured, mentally-ill people. Over $100 million would be cut from charity care at New Hampshire hospitals. Severely disabled people would be put on a waiting list.

If the House budget becomes law, people who are denied state assistance will turn to the welfare offices of our cites and towns for help. And it is here that the House budget is the most shocking-it would remove the requirement that local governments provide assistance to the poor. If the House budget becomes law, cities and towns would not be required to spend any more on assistance to the poor than they did this year. If the need for services goes up, a town can say "we've exhausted our welfare budget," and turn people out onto the street.

For over three centuries, local government has been the assistance of last resort. If a person cannot receive State assistance-because he or she does not qualify for a state program for the disabled, blind, mentally ill, parents with minor children, etc.-local government is there to help before a person is left hungry and homeless. The House budget would change all that, turning New Hampshire into a very different place. For the first time in nearly 300 years, people in need would literally have nowhere to turn for help.

New Hampshire has the highest median family income of any state. Our state and local tax burden is fifth-lowest in the nation. State spending in New Hampshire is also fifth-lowest in the nation. The suggestion we cannot "afford" to care for our neediest residents is unsupportable.

The Republican majority in the New Hampshire House says we cannot raise one additional dollar to help our neediest citizens-indeed, they are proposing tax cuts that will slash more holes in the social safety net. Have we really become that hard-hearted?

Mark Fernald was the 2002 Democratic nominee for Governor, and is Treasurer of the Granite State Fair Tax Coalition

To join Mark Fernald's political email list, send an email to mark@markfernald.com

Mark Fernald :: The Founders of New Hampshire would not join This Tea Party
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Conway (0.00 / 0)
Any chance we can publish this in the Conway Daily Sun? Especially since Rep Guinta is going to grace us with his presence next Wednesday.  

May as well try- I got something in as a Letter To The Editor that was as long, (0.00 / 0)
if not longer, about a year ago.

[ Parent ]
Thank you, Mark. (0.00 / 0)
Well written essay which should be published in all the papers and read in the Representatives' Hall the next time there is a meeting there.  


Oh, to hear the screams in the Legislature after that would be read... (0.00 / 0)
"Sichilism!" "Big gummint!" "Marxist!"

[ Parent ]
Submit to UL (4.00 / 1)
At worst they don't print it!  

"No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it." Albert Einstein

That brings up the moral dilemma- Is one right to submit to the Union Leader? (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
Excellent summary (4.00 / 1)
of the actual history of the state.  Conservatives have done a remarkable job of revising popular history to show early New Hampshire and the United States as a place of rigid individualism, ignoring the real facts and necessities of community from the beginning.  There is neither a historic or economic excuse for the malicious budget presented by the House this year, and we need pieces like this to help illustrate that.  Thanks.

Too long. (0.00 / 0)
As someone whose posts are always too long and convoluted, let me suggest that you work on presenting your excellent ideas and perspective in somewhat shorter bites.

it's an op-ed (4.00 / 3)
And as someone who writes op-eds, I'd say the length is perfectly acceptable. Common, even.  

[ Parent ]
I'm anticipating that Mr. Fernald will offer himself as a candidate (4.00 / 1)
for public office again. Lengthy essays are off-putting to many people. There's a reason Reader's Digest was/is popular and short letters to the editor actually get read. There's a reason Twitter is so popular.

[ Parent ]
I'm interested to hear you suggest (0.00 / 0)
dumbing things down, for the short attention span crowd,  hannah.

My op-eds are actually read, every other week, by people who get quite impassioned about them. On average one of my op-eds is 1000 words long.

People either read or they do not. A thousand words is not a lengthy essay.  


[ Parent ]
Great job (0.00 / 0)
This is a wonderful piece to highlight the true history of New Hampshire and its traditions.

little camera girl

Zandra Rice Hawkins (Granite State Progress)



Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox