About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editor
Mike Hoefer

Editors
elwood
susanthe
William Tucker
The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
New Hampshire Labor News
Chaz Proulx: Right Wing Watch

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes

Campaigns, Et Alia.
NH-Gov
- Maggie Hassan
NH-01
- Andrew Hosmer
- Carol Shea-Porter
- Joanne Dowdell
NH-02
- Ann McLane Kuster

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

The Roots of Social Security: Thomas Paine

by: Jennifer Daler

Thu Jul 14, 2011 at 08:39:14 AM EDT


It seems that among the heroes of the American Revolution, often invoked by tea-partiers, "natural rights" enthusiasts and others who wish to see the end of Social Security and other government programs to alleviate poverty, we have Thomas Paine (1737-1809), author of the pamphlet Common Sense, without which the American Revolution might not have happened.

Paine also authored another pamphlet, this one less well known but no less important. It is called Agrarian Justice, and in it we find a social insurance plan for both the elderly and those just starting out in life.

From Social Security Online:

The benefits were to be paid from a national fund accumulated for this purpose. The fund was to be financed by a 10% tax on inherited property. A tax on inherited property was used due to Paine's general philosophy of property rights.

The pamphlet was written in French during the winter of 1795-1796. Paine was living in France at the time and was involved with the beginning stages of the French Revolution. It was published in English in 1797.

Jennifer Daler :: The Roots of Social Security: Thomas Paine
Paine opens his treatise by pointing to the fact that civilization creates poverty. As was done in his time, he compares Europeans to Native Americans as a contrast between a "civilized" culture and a culture in the "natural state". He says that the life of a Native American is a "continual holiday", compared to the poor of Europe,
on the other hand it appears to be abject when compared to the rich. Civilization, therefore, or that which is so-called, has operated two ways: to make one part of society more affluent, and the other more wretched, than would have been the lot of either in a natural state.

Paine says that it is not possible to go from a "civilized" to a "natural" state. One reason is that the amount of land required to support the population would simply not be available. He also states, rightly,  that despite the fact that civilization's purpose should be to improve the lot of human beings, millions of people born in the "civilized" world would have been better off if they had been born in the "natural state".

Paine puts the beginning of poverty with the possession of land that began with cultivation and the advent of private property. He says while cultivation has given to the earth a "tenfold value", it has also created the "greatest evil" by dispossessing the majority of their "natural inheritance" through "landed monopoly.
(bold mine)

In advocating the case of the persons thus dispossessed, it is a right, and not a charity, that I am pleading for. But it is that kind of right which, being neglected at first, could not be brought forward afterwards till heaven had opened the way by a revolution in the system of government. Let us then do honor to revolutions by justice, and give currency to their principles by blessings
.

Now to the plan:

To create a national fund, out of which there shall be paid to every person, when arrived at the age of twenty-one years, the sum of fifteen pounds sterling, as a compensation in part, for the loss of his or her natural inheritance, by the introduction of the system of landed property:

And also, the sum of ten pounds per annum, during life, to every person now living, of the age of fifty years, and to all others as they shall arrive at that age.

Paine details the inheritance tax in the pamphlet very specifically and  for eighteenth century conditions.

So was Thomas Paine a "commie" whose death nine years before Marx's birth is merely a minor detail? Or did he consider access to food, clothing, shelter, health care and other needs to be a right in a free society?

Paine's concept, if not his method, was adopted 126 years after his death. It shows that the idea that government should help alleviate social injustice is not a socialist plot, but was there at the beginning of our nation.

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
This is great, Jennifer. (4.00 / 2)
Can't wait to see what flavor of pretzel the FS/TP/GOoPer cabal will concoct out of this as soon as they see it.

They aren't interested in risk sharing, which is exactly what civilization is all about (as in the familiar Holmes quote on taxes).

They. Don't. Care.
We do.
Rinse, repeat.


Yes, great find, Jen (4.00 / 2)
The whole "go-it-alone" syndrome makes a nice adolescent male fantasy, but when reality strikes, "we're all in this together" makes a much better motto.

(Maybe adolescent girls also believe they don't need others, but not very many of them, I would guess.)


[ Parent ]
Prediction (4.00 / 1)
Any response from the wingnut peanut gallery will inevitably consist of one and/or the other of the following:

1. That's not what Tom Paine meant (he really meant pretzel...pretzel...pretzel...because we say so, that is why).

2. Tom Paine was an idiot.

Just wait and see.

They. Don't. Care.
We do.
Rinse, repeat.


[ Parent ]
I've got another one: (4.00 / 3)
I was having a twitter exchange with a Tea Person a couple weeks ago, and mentioned the Paine plan.

Because it's not "in the Constitution," it's just not as kosher, Founding Father notwithstanding.

This is basically fundamentalist thinking, you know.  Or to put it another way, the exact opposite of the Enlightenment-era mentality that the Founders cherished.

birch paper; on Twitter @deanbarker


[ Parent ]
The Enlightenment??? (4.00 / 3)
sounds like a Socialist plot.

They. Don't. Care.
We do.
Rinse, repeat.


[ Parent ]
At this point (4.00 / 1)
a little "socialism" of the Scandinavian sort sounds good to me!  Their lives always sound so much more secure and happy than ours these days.  

[ Parent ]
This is extremely consistent... (4.00 / 2)
...with the Dem Freedom Caucus' and the Geo-libertarian (leftist) Land Value Tax approach. The idea is that while people create "things," justifying their private ownership, no human created natural resources, which belong to all of humanity.  This approach chooses to tax Land Value (NOT the same as a Property Tax) as the SOLE revenue-raising formula, as a way for large landholders who lock up resources to pay 'rent' to the community for so doing.

It is also consistent with the left-libertarian opposition to inequality based on Market structure, or the "Tenancy-Chattel-Indenture" inequity in Land, Labor, and Capital Markets.

That being said, Right-wing Libertarians have no clue what I'm talking about...as I have discovered :-(


Good point (4.00 / 2)
Right-wing Libertarians have no clue what I'm talking about...as I have discovered

I forgot this choice in my list:

3. Huh?

They. Don't. Care.
We do.
Rinse, repeat.


[ Parent ]
And yet the big property tax foofaraw (0.00 / 0)
in recent years was stirred up by right-wingers over the "View Tax:" if your house has a gorgeous view of Mount Monadnock, or Mount Washington, and therefore has a huge market value, you pay more.

"Unfair!"

As though the view was a human-created thing.


[ Parent ]
precisely... (0.00 / 0)
...the right loves property taxes when its cast as an alternative to Income and sales taxes, and when their acreage permits them to enter current Use....but when such a tax is based on the value of the land itself (one of the few property-based taxes that does NOT skew the sale value vis a vis other properties), watch them scream bloody murder...

[ Parent ]
Let's be careful with how we (0.00 / 0)
incent G-d, after all.

[ Parent ]
I kinda love the View Tax Foofaraw (0.00 / 0)
As it points out how ridiculous a tax based on land ownership is.

Good discussion here way back in Diary 152  

Hope >> Fear





Create a free Blue Hampshire account and join the conversation.


[ Parent ]
Thanks, Jennifer - I need to learn my Paine (4.00 / 3)
Fascinating - while Jefferson et al are building structures on natural rights philosophy, Paine addresses the same inconvenient issue Will May was talking about a bit ago here: "Maybe my grand-dad made that swap (of pure freedom for social contract), but I never did!"

The devil's always in the details, but Paine at least tries to square the circle.

Now WHAT the hell is Dylan talking about: "Just then Tom Paine himself, came running from across the field..."


I think the Tom Paine award dinner fiasco, right? Where he said he kind of understood Oswald? (4.00 / 1)
It's actually kind of a wrongheaded song in that context, or would be, except Dylan makes it so nicely ambiguous.

But I think the broad idea is the lure of being a spokesperson for the movement tempts him but Tom Paine himself wouldn't have wanted it that way.

Except, of course, Dylan alters it enough that it transcends that and becomes this weird gothic tale much bigger than allegory.  



[ Parent ]
Just now reading up on it n/t (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
Fascinating (0.00 / 0)
Thanks Jen.

I'm more informed than I was ten minutes ago.

Good catch.


my hero (0.00 / 0)
a pamphleteer and a printer...In wonder if there was a bug?

note to close readers: this might be sarcastic so think twice before reading to candidates for use in their attacks on each other


Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox