About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editor
Mike Hoefer

Editors
elwood
susanthe
William Tucker
The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
New Hampshire Labor News
Chaz Proulx: Right Wing Watch

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes

Campaigns, Et Alia.
NH-Gov
- Maggie Hassan
NH-01
- Andrew Hosmer
- Carol Shea-Porter
- Joanne Dowdell
NH-02
- Ann McLane Kuster

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Frank Guinta Does "All the Right Things Politically"

by: Dean Barker

Sun Nov 13, 2011 at 07:31:15 AM EST


( - promoted by William Tucker)

Frank Guinta earned an up arrow this week:
The first district Congressman continues to do all the right things politically. This week, he was in the paper for visiting a school, and now he is holding job fairs for veterans.
Politically, Frank Guinta is doing all the right things. In terms of actual help for veterans, not so much:
I had the displeasure recently of attending U.S. Rep. Frank Guinta's job fair at the New Hampshire Community College in Manchester. My son, who is a U.S. Marine, and I traveled from the Monadnock Region to attend this job fair. We arrived just before 10 a.m.

Companies with applications were nowhere to be found, not a good thing for veteran job-seekers. They had a table with some snacks on it...

It was a sorry excuse for wasting my gas money. I didn't see one representative from a company that had job applications.

Politically, this taxpayer funded Google Ad is effective:
Congressman Frank Guinta is fighting to strengthen & preserve Social Security and Medicare
The political gold of that ad, paid for by you and me, is that it omits candidate Guinta's stated support - on video - for abolishing Social Security. Or Congressman Guinta's interest in privatizing Medicare, on record even before he voted for the Ryan plan - which ends Medicare.

Politically, Frank Guinta's photo op in front of a project funded with stimulus money was especially effective. A central pillar of candidate Frank Guinta's campaign was his opposition to the American Recovery Act. Here's one of numerous examples:

"When will Congresswoman Shea-Porter finally agree with the rest of us who believe her failed stimulus was a waste of our money?"
(find me > 140 on birch paper; on Twitter < 140)
Dean Barker :: Frank Guinta Does "All the Right Things Politically"
Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Isn't it nice (4.00 / 2)
that the supposedly premier political reporter in NH thinks that the hypocrisy you highlight so tellingly is "doing the all the right things politically."  I am so glad I read this before I ate breakfast this morning.  As long as the coffee doesn't come back up...

"Doing all the right things politically" (0.00 / 0)
to me, that phrase brings to mind hollow statements and gestures. If that was the intent, then I think the writing was reporting accurately. I'm not sure how others read that, though.

[ Parent ]
Guinta (0.00 / 0)
reminds me a bit of Romney.  Say whatever and appear to support whatever you think voters want to hear, while doing either nothing or the complete opposite.  Let's see, does Guinta support waterboarding, war with Iran, and privation of veterans' health care?  

Who's lining your pockets, Frank?????????????  


They all do it. It's in their DNA (0.00 / 0)
...and their marketing playbooks.

"Autumn is a second spring when every leaf is a flower."
Albert Camus



[ Parent ]
Ovide deserves equal attention - (4.00 / 3)
He was at the ribbon-cutting for the stimulus-funded project, after campaigning against the stimulus, too.

Great political insight (4.00 / 4)
Sure Guinta does all things right. That's why his favorability is at 20%.

Guinta was a fluke, a placeholder for Shea-Porter, so she (0.00 / 0)
could get a rest from wrestling with the predators on Capitol Hill. The 112 th Congress was never going to accomplish anything if the executive was actually going to be busy implementing all the legislation put forth by the 111th.

Take note, for example, that the consolidation of student loans under the aegis of the Department of Education, which was scheduled to be commence in 2014 is actually taking off come January 2012.  Transitioning a loan guarantee program from the banks into a federal agency is a significant step, not just because direct loans are more efficient and less expensive, but because it signals the private sector that if they don't invest, we will do it ourselves through the public purse without giving the middlemen their cut.

More attention also needs to be paid to the reforms in the school feeding program and the emphasis on better nutrition for all children, not just the needy.  This means a shift in emphasis from a subsidy for the food processing industry to the health of the food consumers.  While I don't much like the term "consumer," when it comes to children get fed, it's appropriate. The public welfare should be focused on the consumer, rather than the profit margins of the producers and the middlemen.


When we discuss jobs (0.00 / 0)
and the economy, it really helps to make it clear what is going on when we make that distinction, between the part of the economy that produces goods and services that people actually use and benefit from, that part that produces goods and services that actually cause more harm than good, and that part that siphons off money for the middlemen.  What would we see if we accounted for economic activity by separating those?  

Here, as well as in national economy, we need to start with our priorities.  Do we want to make the rich richer, or do we want the economy to work for the rest of us?  As hannah points out, do we want to make college available to the many, do we want to feed hungry children, or do we want to increase the profits of agribusiness and the banks, who are already making out like bandits?


[ Parent ]

Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox