About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editor
Mike Hoefer

Editors
elwood
susanthe
William Tucker
The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
New Hampshire Labor News
Chaz Proulx: Right Wing Watch
Defending New Hampshire Public Education

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes

Campaigns, Et Alia.
NH-Gov
- Maggie Hassan
- Jackie Cilley
NH-01
- Andrew Hosmer
- Carol Shea-Porter
- Joanne Dowdell
NH-02
- Ann McLane Kuster

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

State GOP Flys Its Freak Flag

by: Gary Patton

Mon Jan 16, 2012 at 14:26:23 PM EST


( - promoted by William Tucker)

What do we think of when we imagine a Republican office holder from New Hampshire? We think of someone who is rational, sober, fiscally conservative, and opposed to high taxes. We think of someone who wants small, thrifty, and efficient government, right? Wrong! Ever so wrong! Perhaps, there was a time when Republican office holders answered to that description, but no more.

Today, Republicans in the New Hampshire legislature are a witch's brew of Free Staters, Tea Party members, and extreme libertarians who have concocted weird legislative potions that are making our state the laughingstock of the nation.

Rachel Maddow held New Hampshire Republican office holders up to ridicule on her nationally-televised program (1/5/12). Maddow notes, "When Republicans won up and down the ballot all across the country in the 2010 mid-terms, there were few places where their victories were as big as they were in New Hampshire. (Before the election) Democrats controlled the New Hampshire House by a margin of 216-173. . . . Republicans flipped the New Hampshire House and they flipped it by a huge margin. They gained 124 seats."

"That was basically the same story in the State Senate. Republicans went from being a minority in the senate to having their biggest majority there in nearly half a century."

"So what have New Hampshire Republicans done with their big new majorities? They have taken a state with a national reputation for being sort of sane and within the mainstream among the Republican Party and they have decided to let their freak flag fly."

Gary Patton :: State GOP Flys Its Freak Flag
Maddow then cites specific examples. A Republican legislator proposed a commission be formed to bring charges of treason against President Obama, Shortly thereafter, nine Republican state representatives joined with Orly Taitz, a leader of the birther movement, to have Obama's name taken off the New Hampshire Primary ballot. Maddow comments, "A few weeks after that, New Hampshire Republicans crafted a pair of bills aimed at rolling back the teaching of evolution in the schools."

In the past week, Republican House and Senate members passed a bill that would allow parents to have their children opt out of particular lessons in specific classes. Teachers would have to accommodate themselves to this new rule by creating an alternate lesson plan for each parental objection. The arch-conservative New Hampshire Union-Leader, normally an ally of Republicans, called this legislation "a simply awful bill that is neither workable nor sensible."

The Portsmouth Herald added in an editorial (1/8/12), "so now any parent could stop any teacher from teaching any lesson without any reason. As if our teachers didn't have a hard enough job already."

But wait - there's more Republican craziness. The Herald adds in the same editorial, "Despite the pleading of police and school leaders, the House passed a bill making it legal to carry concealed weapons on any public property, including colleges, any public land or any publicly financed buidlings." Oh boy, just what we need - concealed weapons at college beer parties. Under the bill, people would be able to surreptitiously carry guns into private businesses at Pease International Tradeport (who rent from the state) without the business owner's knowledge or permission.

But that's not all. Republicans were the main source of support for a bill eliminating the need to get a license to carry a concealed, loaded weapon. Under the bill, anyone, except convicted felons, can get and carry a loaded, concealed weapon, anywhere and anytime.

Don't go away; there's more. House Republicans heavily supported a bill allowing payday loan businesses to increase their annual interest rates from 36 percent to as much as an eye-popping 400 percent.

But, the topper is yet to come. Maddow comments, "Three Republican state lawmakers introduced a bill that will force state legislators to say where in the Magna Carta they get the right to propose any new given law for New Hampshire. The Magna Carta - the ancient list of feudal demands made of the king of England in the 13th Century."

That's right. Showing that a bill is constitutional isn't enough; it also has to pass muster with the Magna Carta. What can we do about Republican lawmakers making New Hampshire a national joke? To avoid mocking laughter when we go out of state, we might wear a disguise and never mention that we live in New Hampshire.

Or we can vote these Republicans out of office in the 2012 General Election. The Portsmouth Herald notes in its editorial, "We're confident that, once voters get the full sense of exactly what these lawmakers have been up to, the politicians will be tossed out of office and their reign of terror brought to an end."  

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Gold Star! (4.00 / 3)
You get the Gold Star of the day.  What a fantastic roundup that doesn't even begin to scratch the surface of what this state has been through.

"We start working to beat these guys right now." -Jed Bartlet

Excellent Posting... (4.00 / 4)
...and the Herald description of the

reign of terror

is very appropriate and accurate.

Good job!  

[I'm a former has-been House member and State Senator, but I keep "Rep." on my ID name for easy reference of previous posts.]


Reign of Terror (4.00 / 4)
seems to happen every Jan. when the haters from the right go to Concord to undo the work of others in the attempt to create equality in this state.  

Will we see a bill to legalize the flying of a Christian flag over the State House next?


[ Parent ]
Don't give them any ideas. n/t (4.00 / 4)


[ Parent ]
Budget cuts too. (0.00 / 0)
Thank you for this post.  
We are in for a rough few months as the Republicans in charge push more bad legislation through the House and Senate.  Some bad bills will not make it due to some combination of public exposure, strong resistance from our amazing Democrats who are now sitting in the House and Senate, and the threat or reality of the Governor's veto.  But some bad bills will get through.  The only real remedy will be the turn around that I expect - if we stay smart and are able to field enough good candidates - will happen next November from Republican to Democratic control at the state house.
But what about the budget?  Today's Union Leader has the Speaker saying this:  
O'Brien said that some people believe that budget cuts under this Legislature have been "cruel," but he said there is only a limited amount of money to be divided up among all the state departments and agencies and the Legislature refuses to increase taxes or fees.

"If we want to spend more at UNH," said O'Brien, citing an example, "we have to cut services for developmentally disabled children. We want people to tell us where to take the money out of."

O'Brien's position looking forward and the budget enacted by the Republican House and Senate for 2011-2012 are not acceptable.  What can we do to show the distortions in O'Brien's frame of reference?  - to show that disabled children need not and must not be pitted in a zero sum game with UNH students?  What is the alternative frame of reference that Democrats should be putting forward?


We could start (4.00 / 2)
by reminding people that NH has one of the highest per capita incomes in the country.  

There is no lack of money in this state, there is a lack of the political will to restructure our tax policy so that we don't have to choose between our university system and supporting NH families who have children with disabilities, one example of many.  

I hope someone can come up with a way to change the mind of NH voters, because otherwise I will be looking for another state to live in.  They apparently intend to add retirees on limited incomes to those they pit against each other in the ring of NH's race to the bottom.  


[ Parent ]
I do think the school thing is a major over-reach that could harm them (0.00 / 0)
I have talked to several rock-ribbed Republicans in Haverhill about that law.  They actually jumped very easily to imagining how un-workable the process would be. If you think about it, active left-leaning people are just as likely to object to parts of the curriculum -- there goes any mention of Christopher Columbus! -- as right-wingers.

I asked, "Did you send your representative to the legislature to pass such nonsense and have hard working teachers driven insane by crazy helicopter parents?  So that 2 years from now they can claim that the schools are a mess and they have to "do something about it?"  It makes people shake their heads.  One even admitted a sensible Democrat would be better than a crazy Republican.  


I must live a sheltered life - none of my "left-leaning" (3.25 / 4)
friends want to erase Christopher Columbus from the history books.

(Many of us, however, would cheer the death of half-witted 'invent a sin on the other side to match the one you see here' punditry.)


[ Parent ]
For me, its the refusal to talk about Arabic history. (4.00 / 1)
Because, seriously, the only civilization of much merit not discussed in my history textbook is the flourishing post-Roman Islamic civilization- Islam, of course, being painted in a VERY negative light in the book.

[ Parent ]
Please let me assure you (4.00 / 1)
As the spouse of a teacher for 30 years, there is no distinction between liberal or conservative when it comes to demanding curriculum changes. When I served on the school board (in VT), we got several complaints about teaching the history of New World exploration.

My overall point is that most people, if given time to think about it, don't think this law is workable, and that it's a silly thing for the legislature to do.  We can capitalize on it.


[ Parent ]
About the teaching of something, (0.00 / 0)
or about the NOT teaching of the context?

A simple celebratory  story of Columbus, Pizarro and others bringing all the benefits of Europe to the Americas, without any discussion of the cultures that were there beforehand, or the effects of new germs on populations with no immunities - yes, that generates complaints.

But there is a difference, it seems to me, between demanding that schools tell NO story versus demanding that they tell a FULLER story.

(With Texas getting a veto over the contents of textbooks, maybe both are problems for the teachers on the frontlines.)


[ Parent ]
Magna Carta? huh, Sounds Euro-pean to me. (4.00 / 1)
I'd prefer out laws to be based on something more  Amercin' Maybe something like the Haudenosaunee Great law of peace. (you could look it up if Wikipedia wasn't taking the day off)

At least they didn't get what they REALLY wanted. (0.00 / 0)
I fear to think of Bill O'Brien in charge of a House that needs Biblical approval for every bill.

[ Parent ]
GOP Running Wild, back in 2010 (0.00 / 0)
some golden oldies from the days when the lunatics weren't running the asylum.  Baldasaro & Bates are now committee chairs:




sitting state rep: running for re-election in 2012.


I've said it before and I'll say it again (0.00 / 0)
It is a mistake, in my view, to think of these behaviors as some kind of misguided blundering by people not paying attention. Read the blogs and LTE. Many, if not most in this state of confusion want the legislature to do these things. They are glad they have done them and are hoping for more. They are not embarrassed by O'Keefe and O'Brien and Bettencourt, they are grinning from ear to ear. There are not rational people and they do think global warming is an liberal wet dream, that gay marriage will result in the end of civilization, that Darwin was bonkers, that dirty hippies corrupted the nation's youth, that money is speech, that corporations are people, that to save our souls before the rapture must elect the megawealthy, that abortion is gleefully provided by liberals to suborn women, that property taxes are a perfectly fine way to support our state and on and on.

I don't see why you don't believe it. They say it over and over and over. They pass laws about these things. They exert themselves in spite of the abrogation and ridicule of pretty much any intelligent and knowledgeable source. They spend any money they can supporting candidates who go on TV to state the obviously false.

The difference this makes is immense. Tactics are much different to defeat the convinced and unapproachable. Minds are not going to be changed by pointing out the folly. They know and reject all the science based stuff that the rest of us know has made possible their ability to deny the truth. Ask Santorum if there should be such a thing as an abortion ever under any circumstances - rape, incest, life of the mother, visit from aliens. The answer is no even though his wife had one. Now if that isn't a fact resistant to truth, what would you call it? Just ask either Groen. Wasted breath, mine and yours.


I've said it before and I'll say it again. (0.00 / 0)
It is a mistake, in my view, to think of these behaviors as some kind of misguided blundering by people not paying attention. Read the blogs and LTE. Many, if not most in this state of confusion want the legislature to do these things. They are glad they have done them and are hoping for more. They are not embarrassed by O'Keefe and O'Brien and Bettencourt, they are grinning from ear to ear. There are not rational people and they do think global warming is an liberal wet dream, that gay marriage will result in the end of civilization, that Darwin was bonkers, that dirty hippies corrupted the nation's youth, that money is speech, that corporations are people, that to save our souls before the rapture must elect the megawealthy, that abortion is gleefully provided by liberals to suborn women, that property taxes are a perfectly fine way to support our state and on and on.

I don't see why you don't believe it. They say it over and over and over. They pass laws about these things. They exert themselves in spite of the abrogation and ridicule of pretty much any intelligent and knowledgeable source. They spend any money they can supporting candidates who go on TV to state the obviously false.

The difference this makes is immense. Tactics are much different to defeat the convinced and unapproachable. Minds are not going to be changed by pointing out the folly. They know and reject all the science based stuff that the rest of us know has made possible their ability to deny the truth. Ask Santorum if there should be such a thing as an abortion ever under any circumstances - rape, incest, life of the mother, visit from aliens. The answer is no even though his wife had one. Now if that isn't a fact resistant to truth, what would you call it? Just ask either Groen. Wasted breath, mine and yours.


xteeth is a man (?) of his word. (4.00 / 1)
He said it before, now he's said it again.

[ Parent ]

Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox