About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editor
Mike Hoefer

Editors
elwood
susanthe
William Tucker
The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Susan the Bruce
New Hampshire Labor News
Chaz Proulx: Right Wing Watch
Defending New Hampshire Public Education

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
NewsViewsBlues- Arnesen

Campaigns, Et Alia.
NH-Gov
- Jackie Cilley
- Maggie Hassan
NH-01
- Carol Shea-Porter
- Matthew Hancock
NH-02
- Ann McLane Kuster
NH-Senate
- D4: David Waters
- D9: Lee Nyquist
NH-Executive Council
- D2: Colin Van Ostern
- D4: Chris Pappas
- D5: Debora Pignatelli

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

House Moves to Bipartisan Waste of Time

by: elwood

Mon Mar 26, 2012 at 19:25:57 PM EDT


Maybe they can get a majority for casino gambling. The measure enjoys some support from both parties. Gambling has never really been a partisan issue - it has strong proponents, and strong opponents, in each party.

But nobody expects a two-thirds majority, and Governor Lynch has pledged to veto it. So, the effort amounts to posturing and pre-positioning for the upcoming election. It won't affect the budget one way or another.

Nevertheless, the bill has its despicable, odious streak. Is this how New Hampshire can pay for education - maybe providing some relief for middle-class property tax bills? Don't be silly. The proceeds would all be dedicated to lowering the business profits and business enterprise tax.

elwood :: House Moves to Bipartisan Waste of Time
Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

So, basically, casinos (0.00 / 0)
will do nothing to help the over burdened homeowner and the 19th century tax system based on what you own and not on your ability to pay.  Great.

But it lets you say (4.00 / 2)
that you are supposedly trying to solve the problem without breaking The Pledge.  

[ Parent ]
Gambling revenues would never... (4.00 / 1)
have offset property taxes in any meaningful way.

A few years ago when gambling last came up during the Democratic  majority, I saw an ad on WMUR touting the great revenues of $200 million for the state coffers.

Well, we collect about $3 BILLION in property taxes in this state. Even if all that gambling revenue went to offset property taxes, it would have brought them down less that 10%.

IF gambling revenues would have come in as high as promoted. IF gambling revenues were to prove a stable state tax source.

JillSH


And it's not an offset NH needs (4.00 / 1)
Property taxes are high by national standards, and they put an undue burden on those on fixed-incomes, and they disproportionately favor the wealthy, and they lead to poor land use and suburban sprawl. Aside from all those issue and the open debate that should be had about all revenue structures, New Hampshire does not need to offset existing revenue, it needs to increase it.

Programs and infrastructure were already structurally underfunded before 2011, and they are now lethally underfunded. Offsetting property or even business taxes, whatever the merits may or may not be, is not the issue. The issue is finding reliable revenue streams to pay for the programs and infrastructure that New Hampshire needs, and that New Hampshire residents want.


[ Parent ]
why the waste of time because it may ensure that your campaign coffers are stuffed with gambling dollars (4.00 / 3)
John Lynch like Craig Benson was a very rich man and gambling checks were not necessary to wage a vigorous campaign for governor. This time around none of the candidates are in the multimillion dollar range and will need to raise millions to support their campaigns. Now that businesses can cut checks to candidates it will be interesting to track the support of gambling interests to the support of different candidates for Gov. Exec. Council and the NH State Senate. The problem with gambling is not the addiction of the players but the dependence of the political actors to the campaign cash needed for elections and the dollars desperately needed by the starving revenue stream that no longer is supported by taxes but supported by competing casinos and slots.  


Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox