About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editor
Mike Hoefer

Editors
elwood
susanthe
William Tucker
The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch paper
Democracy for NH
Granite State Progress
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Pickup Patriots
Re-BlueNH
Susan the Bruce
New Hampshire Labor News
Chaz Proulx: Right Wing Watch
Defending New Hampshire Public Education

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Landrigan
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
NewsViewsBlues- Arnesen

Campaigns, Et Alia.
NH-Gov
- Jackie Cilley
- Maggie Hassan
NH-01
- Carol Shea-Porter
- Joanne Dowdell
- Matthew Hancock
NH-02
- Ann McLane Kuster
NH-Senate
- D4: David Waters
- D9: Lee Nyquist
NH-Executive Council
- D2: Colin Van Ostern
- D4: Chris Pappas
- D5: Debora Pignatelli

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Oops - Charlie Bass Campaign In Trouble

by: Kathy Sullivan 2

Tue Apr 03, 2012 at 16:34:40 PM EDT


( - promoted by William Tucker)

The NH Attorney General announced today that his office is suing the Bass Victory Committee for push polling violations. This is not the run of the mill push polling violation where a polling company doing message testing did not understand the NH push polling disclosure requirements. In this case, the Bass campaign knew and tried to hide its involvement.  In September, 2010, the Tarrance Group was hired to do a poll. The original scrpt said, at the end, paid for by the Bass Victory Committee.  Bass's campaign manager e mailed the company and asked that they change the disclosure to say paid for by the NRCC:

Could we change the disclaimer at the end to NRCC [National Republican Congressional Committee] since they are paying for half of it? I'd rather have any issues about 'push polling' be blamed on them (sorry Brock), rather than us - especially with the date rape drug question in there.
Kathy Sullivan 2 :: Oops - Charlie Bass Campaign In Trouble
That isn't the worst part, although trying to hide their responsibility is pretty bad.
According to the lawsuit, after receiving a complaint aboiut the poll and starting its investigation, the AG issued a subpoena for correspondence between the campaign and the Tarrance Group.  The Bass committee, through legal counsel, said there was none.The AG withdrew its subpoena.

But the plot thickens, as after further investigation, the AG issued a second subpoena to "verify the accuracy of prior representations". 500 pages of e mails were then produced (!) one of which was the e mail telling Tarrance to change the disclosure to leave out the reference to the Bass committee as paying for the ad.

Oopsie.

Suit has been filed, and the AG is looking for a penalty of $1,000 per each of the 400 calls (would be interesting to know how the AG discovered that it would be a good idea to issue that second subpoena).

This is bad - failing to disclose the Bass campaign was involved in the calls was a deliberate effort to sidestep the law, and not truthfully responding to the first subpoena was an effort to cover up the violation.  

Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

It gets better (0.00 / 0)
Or worst, depending on your perspective.

Bass's 2010 campaign manager was David Kanevsky, who in the October 2011 issue of Campaigns and Elections said,I think my polling background has really helped me in managing races.

This story reminds me of 2006, when the NRCC ran those nasty robocalls against Paul Hodes the weekend before the election. On that Sunday,  Bass said he called the NRCC and asked them to stop making the calls.

And then there was that Tad Furtado sock puppet incident, where a Bass congressional staffer was using his government computer to post on line.

That is three incidents onvolving Bass campaigns.



"When you get to the end of your rope, tie a knot and hang on."  Franklin D. Roosevelt    


If I worked for Bass, (4.00 / 1)
I wouldn't want to tell anyone about it, either.

[ Parent ]
Hmm. Maybe these cases really DO take that (4.00 / 6)
long to vet, before bringing them forward.

Maybe I will owe the AG's office an apology, and maybe James O'Keefe won't sleep so well.

A fella can dream...


This makes my day! (4.00 / 7)

Now if the FEC would only investigate Guinta.

Oh well, I'll take what I can get. So few watchdog agencies do their jobs these days.

Thank you to a NH institution for doing what's right.


I agree with Kathy (4.00 / 1)
The real scandal here is the cover-up. Perhaps they'll use the Steve Martin "I forgot..." defense.

But the state's definition of a "push poll" really confuses the discussion. It is very different from the generally accepted definition.

Push polls, according to AAPOR, are "telephone calls disguised as research that aim to persuade large numbers of voters and affect election outcomes, rather than measure opinions." There is very specific criteria to differentiate between a push poll and a legitimate message poll.

NH law defines a push poll much more broadly:

(a) Calling voters on behalf of, in support of, or in opposition to, any candidate for public office by telephone; and

(b) Asking questions related to opposing candidates for public office which state, imply, or convey information about the candidates character, status, or political stance or record; and

(c) Conducting such calling in a manner which is likely to be construed by the voter to be a survey or poll to gather statistical data for entities or organizations which are acting independent of any particular political party, candidate, or interest group.

It's a badly written law. But that shouldn't obscure the fact that the Bass campaign illegally avoided disclosure and then attempted to cover it up.

"Politics ain't beanbag" - Finley Peter Dunne


Exactly (0.00 / 0)
In the UnionLeader today, Bass's spokesperson pushed at the push poll law, ignoring the real issue: that the Bass caaign did not turn over 500 pages of emails despite a subpoena requesting copies of communications. John DiStaso focused on this aspect in addition to the push poll violation, quoting Associate AG Anne Edwards as saying they have not received a clear answer on why the documents were not provided.

Here's some questions: who said, after the first subpoena, that there were no communications? What did Bass know - and oh, yes, when did he know it? Who was calling the shots in not turning the emails over after the subpoena was issued?



"When you get to the end of your rope, tie a knot and hang on."  Franklin D. Roosevelt    


[ Parent ]
the spokesperson (0.00 / 0)
Scott Tranchemontagne is certainly practiced in the art of deception. He was the spokesliar for Club Motorsports, the group still trying to build a racetrack on Mt. Whittier in Tamworth.  

[ Parent ]
Tranchemontagne (0.00 / 0)
is following this thread. He's just ordered me to give him my phone number.  

not exactly an order (0.00 / 0)
to be fair, it was a terse request. :)


[ Parent ]
Ahh, little Scotty. (0.00 / 0)
The old Saruman/Grima relationship, only with their heights reversed.

"Worm! Worm!" Saruman Bass called; and out of a nearby hut came Wormtongue Tranchemontagne, crawling, almost like a dog. "To the road again, Worm!" said Saruman. "These fine fellows and lordlings are turning us adrift again just like they did in 2006. Come along!"

Saruman turned to go, and Wormtongue shuffled after him.

...

"Wormtongue!" called Frodo. "You need not follow him. I know of no evil you have done to me. You can have rest and food here for a while, until you are stronger and can go your own ways."

Wormtongue halted and looked back at him, half prepared to stay. Saruman turned. "No evil?" he cackled. "Oh no! Even when he sneaks out at night it is only to look at the stars. But did I hear someone ask where poor Lotho is hiding? You know, don't you, Worm? Will you tell them?"

Wormtongue cowered down and whimpered: "No, no!"

"Then I will," said Saruman. "Worm killed your Chief, poor little fellow, your nice little Boss. Didn't you, Worm? Stabbed him in his sleep, I believe. Buried him, I hope; though Worm has been very hungry lately. No, Worm is not really nice. You had better leave him to me."

A look of wild hatred came into Wormtongue's red eyes. "You told me to; you made me do it," he hissed.

Saruman laughed. "You do what Sharkey says, always, don't you, Worm? Well, now he says: follow!" He kicked Wormtongue in the face as he grovelled, and turned and made off.



[ Parent ]
Go Bill Go (0.00 / 0)
Rumors swirl that Bully Buffoon O'Brien may run for CD 2.  

No'm Sayn?


Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox