About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors


Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe
William Tucker

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
John Lynch
Jennifer Daler

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Congresswoman Carol Shea-Porter's Position on Iran

by: mountainboy

Fri Dec 14, 2007 at 08:57:51 AM EST


Last week I sent a message to Congresswoman Carol Shea-Porter, asking her to outline her position on  Iran. I asked the Congresswoman if she had read the most recent National Intelligence Estimate,  Iran: Nuclear Intentions and Capabilities . The findings outlined in the NIE challenge the Bush administration's claim that Iran is a country determined to develop nuclear weapons. It stated that Iran halted its nuclear weapons program back in 2003. More importantly, it noted that there is no evidence available that can prove that Iran has resumed nuclear weapons program.

I asked the Congresswoman if she would oppose military action against Iran in light of these recent revelations.

Here is the respose I received:

As a member of the House Armed Services Committee, I support having a strong national defense. However, that does not mean rushing to war without clear provocation, as we did in Iraq. The Iraq war has destabilized the region, weakened our military, and inflamed terrorist organizations worldwide. Our nation is far less safe because of the President's reckless march to war in Iraq.

We should not be naive about the potential danger from Iran, particularly if that nation should acquire nuclear weapons. However, I believe that there is no compelling reason to go to war with Iran at this time.

It is our patriotic duty, as citizens of a great democracy, to hold our leaders to the highest standards, especially in matters of war and peace. Thank you for your vigilance.

Sincerely

Carol Shea-Porter
Member of Congress

Like the Congresswoman, I believe that Iran should be prevented from attaining nuclear weapons. But military action would not be in the best interests of the United States, or the Middle East, at this time. The administration's approach to Iran's nuclear program appears to be based largely on speculation, rather than on verifiable intelligence. America should never engage in military action on such a basis.

I hope to convince other members of Congress to go on the record on this issue as well. We need to know where our representatives stand on this issue. If you live in the 2nd Congressional District in New Hampshire and are interested in contacting Congressman Paul Hodes about this matter please contact me.

David Anderson
davewanderson@care2.com
http://reasonableforeignpolicy...

mountainboy :: Congresswoman Carol Shea-Porter's Position on Iran
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Interest appreciated (0.00 / 0)
I appreciate your interest in the nuclear issue.  However, just as the invasion of Iraq had nothing to do with nuclear weapons, the threats against Iran don't have anything to do with nuclear weapons either, except as a justification for the U.S. to renew its nuclear arsenal.
But mainly, the goal in Iran and elsewhere is to insure that the U.S./Russo consortium maintains a monopoly on the provision of enriched uranium for the production of energy, as well as the re-processing of the spent fuel.
If the U.S. were really interested in preventing the spread of nuclear weapons, it would sign on to the Central Asian Nuclear Weapons Free Zone idea (as Russia and China have already done) and push for the extension of the zone to include all the nations on the edge of the Indian Ocean and on the Arabian Peninsula, all the way to Egypt, which has already agreed to join.  Of course, that would put pressure on Israel to get rid of it's nukes and would reduce the justification for maintaining our own huge arsenal, including the missiles we have set up in Turkey.

Response to comment (0.00 / 0)
Hannah - I agree that the Bush administration's interest in Iran has little to do with any actual threat posed by its nuclear program. The best way to curb the spread of nuclear weapons is for the U.S. to start reducing its own nuclear arsenal, and live up to its obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. It is clear that unless the U.S. - and other nuclear powers - lives up to its end of the bargain more countries will seek to acquire these weapons.

Still, I think it is important to keep an eye on Iran's nuclear program. I do not trust the current administration or the American intelligence community to accomplish this task. I do trust the United Nations and the IAEA to take care of this task in a fair manner.

In general I think the world will be better off once nuclear weapons have been eliminated all together.

David Anderson



[ Parent ]

Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox