Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives
Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch
Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
John Lynch
Jennifer Daler
ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC
National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo
50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
I have a ton of things on the desk at the moment, and I don't have the time to really run out this story before Election Day, but I want to bring to your attention something very strange that I found on the 2008 "Christine O'Donnell for Senate" MySpace page.
What it basically comes down to is that the United States Marine Corps and the United States Army are "Christine O'Donnell for Senate" MySpace friends, or that there are persons who have created United States Army and USMC MySpace pages that purport to be official that have "befriended" her candidacy. There's also a Navy page that appears to emanate from a US Navy recruiting office in California on her '08 campaign's "friends" list.
At a minimum, all of this would seem to be a combination of inappropriate behavior and poor management of social media; at worst, you have activity that is "some kind of unlawful", either on an administrative or civil level.
I'll make this fast...but I'll also make it interesting.
Follow along, and you'll see what I mean.
You may recall that Carol Shea-Porter led the charge on bringing attention to the toxic burn pits that are needlessly harming the health of our men and women in uniform, and getting them shut down. For example, you can watch her here and here in a recent Armed Services Committee hearing questioning the prioritization and speed of tackling this known problem.
Today WaPo brought the issue to the fore again, noting that soldiers and contractors who have become sick are filing suit against KBR:
Hundreds of military service members and contractor employees have fallen ill with cancer or severe breathing problems after serving in Iraq and Afghanistan, and they say they were poisoned by thick, black smoke produced by the burning of tons of trash generated on U.S. bases.
...In March, the military banned most open-air burning of plastics, tires, aerosol cans and other materials. In April, the Department of Veterans Affairs identified burn pits as an environmental hazard. Last month, the American Lung Association, citing health risks to soldiers, urged the military to immediately find other means of trash disposal.
"It's tragic when soldiers come back and didn't get a scratch on them from the enemy but have some possibly life-altering problems because of burn pits," said Rep. Carol Shea-Porter (D-N.H.), one of several lawmakers who pushed to limit the use of the pits.
Military and environmental policy rarely cross paths. Which is a great shame, because our men and women in uniform are often asked to perform under some of the worst environmental conditions around.
But it doesn't have to be this way.
Carol Shea-Porter helped bring soldiers' concerns about KBR's use of open air burn pits to the light of day:
The noxious smoke plumes that wafted over the military base in Balad, Iraq, alarmed Lt. Col. Michelle Franco. The stench from a huge burn pit clung to her clothing, skin and hair.
"I remember thinking: This doesn't look good, smell good or taste good," Franco said recently. "I knew it couldn't be good for anybody."
She wheezed and coughed constantly. When Franco returned to the U.S., she was diagnosed with reactive airway dysfunction syndrome. She is no longer able to serve as an Air Force nurse.
Shea-Porter got to work, and a law was signed by President Obama:
Today Eller, Sheridan, and the many others affected by these pits are getting some good news, thanks in part to the work of Rep. Tim Bishop, Democrat of New York, and Rep. Carol Shea Porter, Democrat of New Hampshire, who have championed their cause for months. They successfully lobbied for the inclusion of provisions to limit the use of these toxic pits in the National Defense Authorization Act, which the president will sign into law this afternoon. Under this new law, open-air burning of medical and hazardous waste will be prohibited except where the Defense secretary deems there is no alternative, the DoD must justify the use of burn pits to Congress, and it will develop a plan to eliminate the use of burn pits entirely.
It's CSP Week on BH. Learn more here about it. Get involved, and give what you can.
(This is a rare moment of Republican message control malfunction. First, the Tea People complain about lack of town halls. Now, the opposite. The underlying strategy is the same, however; no matter how much more of a leader on veterans' issues Carol has been compared to Jeb and the rest, she's insufficiently patriotic because she's... Carol. - promoted by Dean Barker)
This just in from Mark Vallone, in Epping, thanks to Bill Duncan:
There will be an article in the Union Leader tomorrow [Tuesday, Dec. 22] stating that the selectmen may vote to reconsider/retract an invitation it had approved to let Carol Shea-Porter hold a town hall in Epping next month.
Long story short.... there are Navy seals who will have a trial by a court martial for charges relating to the capture of a very evil al-Quaeda operative that involved charges the suspect may have been assaulted while in custody in Iraq. Republican Rep Dan Burton has circulated a letter to other US Reps demanding the Defense Dept. quash the charges. Carol did not sign the letter and so now her patriotism is being questioned.
Carol Shea-Porter has strongly supported our veterans and soldiers. A member of the Armed Services Committee, she has brought increased medical care to NH veterans. She has sponsored legislation to stop the burning of toxic wastes in Iraq and Afghanistan that has caused widespread medical problems for returning veterans. She sponsored an amendment to hold defense contractors accountable for shoddy work such as poor wiring that has killed and injured US soldiers serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. She has voted to approve increases in the defense budget and has traveled to both Iraq and Afghanistan to visit soldiers. These are just a few of the things Carol has done on behalf of our men and women in the armed forces.
I think the selectmen will back down if we show up with a group to speak our case. How ridiculous that the selectmen want to interject themselves into Defense Department issues. How more ridiculous that, instead of looking forward to address their concerns directly to Carol Shea-Porter, they want to tell her to go away. How childish! How irresponsible to want to deny Epping residents their Constitutional right to directly petition the government- face to face- to redress their grievances!
Adding (Dean): This strikes me as the perfect opportunity to show Carol your support.
The title is a trick question for me as well as others. We look at the history of the past century and see that war doesn't have to be inevitable. Until it is.
The history of warfare is long and ugly. I look at it through art, as in Picasso's "Guernica", or the Schiller book on the Thirty Years' War someone gave me, complete with pictures from the time. Ever see a graphic depiction of someone being drawn and quartered? Not pretty.
Then there is the collateral damage. People die who have nothing to do with the conflict, except being in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Navy Adm. Mike Mullen has declared today Military Spouse Appreciation Day.
WASHINGTON, May 7, 2009 -- First Lady Michelle Obama was surprised to learn that the majority of military families feel their struggles often go unnoticed, she said during an interview today with The Pentagon Channel and American Forces Press Service.
"I just saw the results of a recent survey done by Blue Star families that shows that 94 percent of military families feel as if the country doesn't understand their challenges," Obama said. "That's a pretty powerful statement."
Last week I sent a message to Congresswoman Carol Shea-Porter, asking her to outline her position on Iran. I asked the Congresswoman if she had read the most recent National Intelligence Estimate, Iran: Nuclear Intentions and Capabilities . The findings outlined in the NIE challenge the Bush administration's claim that Iran is a country determined to develop nuclear weapons. It stated that Iran halted its nuclear weapons program back in 2003. More importantly, it noted that there is no evidence available that can prove that Iran has resumed nuclear weapons program.
I asked the Congresswoman if she would oppose military action against Iran in light of these recent revelations.
Here is the respose I received:
As a member of the House Armed Services Committee, I support having a strong national defense. However, that does not mean rushing to war without clear provocation, as we did in Iraq. The Iraq war has destabilized the region, weakened our military, and inflamed terrorist organizations worldwide. Our nation is far less safe because of the President's reckless march to war in Iraq.
We should not be naive about the potential danger from Iran, particularly if that nation should acquire nuclear weapons. However, I believe that there is no compelling reason to go to war with Iran at this time.
It is our patriotic duty, as citizens of a great democracy, to hold our leaders to the highest standards, especially in matters of war and peace. Thank you for your vigilance.
Sincerely
Carol Shea-Porter
Member of Congress
Like the Congresswoman, I believe that Iran should be prevented from attaining nuclear weapons. But military action would not be in the best interests of the United States, or the Middle East, at this time. The administration's approach to Iran's nuclear program appears to be based largely on speculation, rather than on verifiable intelligence. America should never engage in military action on such a basis.
I hope to convince other members of Congress to go on the record on this issue as well. We need to know where our representatives stand on this issue. If you live in the 2nd Congressional District in New Hampshire and are interested in contacting Congressman Paul Hodes about this matter please contact me.
David Anderson
davewanderson@care2.com
http://reasonableforeignpolicy...
This evening's Keene Sentinel has an editorial describing three cases where the Congressman has helped the soldiers, or the families. Excerpts below the fold.