About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors

Contributing Writers
elwood
Jennifer Daler
Mike Hoefer
susanthe

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Betsy Devine
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Mike Caulfield
Granite State Progress
Susan the Bruce

Politicos & Punditry
Dorgan
DiStaso
Landrigan
Lawson
Primary Monitor
Scala
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes for Senate
ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
billmon
Bob Geiger
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

RSS Feed

Blue Hampshire RSS


Kelly Ayotte Wants to Review Fetal Homicide Laws

by: Jennifer Daler

Sat Apr 11, 2009 at 07:55:06 AM EDT


The Concord Monitor reports

Attorney General Kelly Ayotte is recommending a review of fetal homicide laws across the country in the wake of a New Hampshire Supreme Court decision that found a 7-month-old fetus killed in a reckless car crash could not be a homicide victim, because the fetus was not "born alive."

Jennifer Daler :: Kelly Ayotte Wants to Review Fetal Homicide Laws
The court found that, under principles in New Hampshire law that date back to the 14th century, the charge [of negligent homicide and manslaughter] did not apply.

"At the very least, an expelled or extracted fetus must show some spontaneous sign of life before it is considered another and its death can result in criminal prosecution," Chief Justice John Broderick wrote in the court's opinion. Two other justices concurred with his opinion.

While this was a horrible event (the details are in the Monitor article), and Lamy (the drunk driver responsible) should be punished, the slippery slope for a woman's right over her body will get steeper and messier if the state creates a statute of murder pertaining to a fetus. It could actually pit the individuality of the fetus, once granted, against that of the mother. Pregnant women could be subject to all kinds of personal restrictions, for fear of being "negligent" if anything happened to the fetus.

I hope Attorney General Ayotte and her staff can recommend legislation that would increase penalties for such crimes where a fetal death is involved, but stop short of the word "homicide". Given the fact that she is a Republican, and took our state's unconstitutional parental notification law to the US Supreme Court, I am concerned.

The Monitor article states that one of the reasons the English common law was set up that way, was to differentiate between stillborn children and those killed by their mothers right after birth, all too common before women had access to birth control and other reproductive choices.

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
"Recommending a review of laws across the country" (4.00 / 5)
Earlier the Attorney General intervened, momentarily, in opposition to the California Supreme Court's ruling on marriage equality.

Just how is any of this her job? Why are we paying for these efforts to grab national headlines?


Lesiglating from the AG office (4.00 / 3)
I think there's a case that this is reasonable task for her office, if the Legislature asks. It is certainly not the attorney general's job to say "Our laws are inadequate, I am going to look around for better laws."


Her re-appointment (4.00 / 4)
was so awesome.

Is there not enough death penalty prosecution work to go around?

Unlike others on BH, I generally do not comment on the AG, since I feel it should be as non-partisan a gig as possible, despite the political reality of it.

But this back-door anti-choice agenda item stinks.


Awful ......... (0.00 / 0)
.... Governor Lynch, was there no Democrat who had the qualifications to be Attorney General? Or, if this had to be a "Hey, I'm bi-partisan" moment, was there no Republican that needed to burnish their Movement Conservative credentials?  

 "We should pay attention to that man behind the curtain."

[ Parent ]
Defining an event in terms of whom it affects (0.00 / 0)
isn't a good idea in this case either.  Why not just bring a charge of aggravated assault?  In combination with reckless endangerment and the other manslaughter, the perpetrator should be able to be put away for a good long while.

How can you have a charge of aggravated assault (0.00 / 0)
...and not 'define' who the assault took place against?  

Bresler for Emperor

[ Parent ]
I hate to say I told you so, but (0.00 / 0)
She's a right-wing loon who Lynch NEVER should have reappointed.  

Powered by: SoapBlox