About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors


Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Betsy Devine
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce

Politicos & Punditry
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
John DeJoie
Ann McLane Kuster
ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Charlie Bass channels his inner Sarah Palin

by: Michael Marsh

Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 08:55:23 AM EDT


( - promoted by Dean Barker)

It's kind of interesting to compare Mr. Bass's prescription for solving our healthcare challenges from the UL with Sarah Palin's big ideas in today's WSJ.

Charlie:

Enact meaningful tort reform. We need a medical malpractice system that streamlines the process...

Sarah:

...reforming tort laws to potentially save billions each year in wasteful spending...

Charlie:

.. [under] universal tax deductibility, health insurers would be incentivized to sell policies to individuals as well as employers because both would enjoy equal treatment under the tax code...

Sarah:

[give] all individuals the same tax benefits received by those who get coverage through their employers...

Charlie:

We should allow any plan legally approved in one state to be offered in all other states

Sarah:

...[change] costly state regulations to allow people to buy insurance across state lines...

There are two differences in their plans. Sarah wants to get rid of Medicare and replace it with vouchers; Charlie is silent on this.  Charlie wants to exempt insurance companies from having to cover pre-existing conditions; Sarah never mentions this business-friendly proposal. And of course, Sarah still believes that Obama is bringing in death panels, or as her ghost-writer now puts it:

...the Democrats' proposals will ultimately lead to rationing of health care by-dare I say it-death panels? Establishment voices dismissed that phrase, but it rang true for many Americans... the fact remains that the Democrats' proposals would still empower unelected bureaucrats to make decisions affecting life or death health-care matters.

We ought to ask Charlie whether he fully endoreses Sarah's big ideas.

Michael Marsh :: Charlie Bass channels his inner Sarah Palin
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
He should also be asked (0.00 / 0)
if he supports the GOP sponsored Seniors' Health Care Bill of Rights. The first item on Steele's list seems to be an ironic twist to previous GOP positions on Medicare.
First, we need to protect Medicare and not cut it in the name of "health-insurance reform." As the president frequently, and correctly, points out, Medicare will go deep into the red in less than a decade. But he and congressional Democrats are planning to raid, not aid, Medicare by cutting $500 billion from the program to fund his health-care experiment. The president also plans to cut hospital payments and Medicare Advantage, all of which will mean fewer treatment options for seniors. These types of "reforms" don't make sense for the future of an already troubled federal program or for the services it provides that millions of Americans count on.
It does come from the national party, but I would be curious to know his thoughts on this pressing matter. In other words. If he don't want to eliminate waste in Medicare just say so.  

Heck, they've littered this debate with so many strawmen and red herrings I can't figure out if they actually have a position other than, Just Say No.

"What you need is sustained outrage...there's far too much unthinking respect given to authority." -- Molly Ivins  


Sarah is certainly going against her party chair.. (0.00 / 0)
... if he is saying they will safeguard Medicare.

She wants to eliminate Medicare and replace it with vouchers that seniors can use to buy their own coverage. This idea is from the Cato Institute, and is an example of the belief that free markets are the solution to everything. To me it sounds like a prescription for conning seniors out of their health insurance.

(A personal anecdote on senior insurance scams: my mother-in-law just had a hip replacement. She had purchased one of the private gap insurance plans that theoretically pay the deductibles that Medicare doesn't cover. Her out-of-pocket bills so far are a couple of thousand and rising. The insurance company agreed to pay $18.)


[ Parent ]
The conservative strategy seems to be based on the reality (0.00 / 0)
that while their followers are ostensibly committed to following the party line--i.e. being obedient--they're not actually going to do what they're told, or anything at all, so it doesn't matter how outrageous the instructions are.

I haven't quite figured it out, but being an organization man seems to be a ticket to entirely guilt-free licentious behavior.  The organization assumes responsibility that it doesn't have the ability to enforce and the membership takes that as an opportunity to behave without any restraints.  It's like a dog bringing a leash to his owner and then running off before his collar is attached.

What's scary is that a dog's behavior tends to be more predictable than a Republican's, unless they're running in a pack.


[ Parent ]
Full of ducklings and puppies, and signifying ill. (4.00 / 4)
Charlie:
   We should allow any plan legally approved in one state to be offered in all other states

Translation:

   We should abolish the office of Insurance Commissioner in 49 states and the District of Columbia.  All insurance companies will now be legally obliged to follow the standards of the Insurance Commissioner of Alabama.

Guinta said the same thing at his health care thing, putting it in terms of customer choice: Why not allow individuals and companies to purchase insurance policies across state lines?

Heck, why stop at state lines?  Make it legal to purchase insurance policies across national lines.  I'm sure the insurance regulations (well, more guidelines, really) of the Cayman Islands are quite sufficient.


Hey, no fair ! (0.00 / 0)
The Republicans are the Great Defenders of the Tenth Amendment! They believe in States' Rights! They like government to be closest to the people!



[ Parent ]
shameless plug (4.00 / 1)
I will take advantage of this opportunity to plug my new line of "Health Care for Most!" Cafepress.com items.  

These patriotic T shirts, stickers and other items will allow you to show your proud acquiessance to the status quo.

For more info see:

http://www.cafepress.com/Healt...




Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox