About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors


Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Betsy Devine
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce

Politicos & Punditry
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
John DeJoie
Ann McLane Kuster
ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Sean Mahoney and the Public Option

by: Dean Barker

Mon Sep 14, 2009 at 19:50:35 PM EDT


I ignored Sean Mahoney's GOP boilerplate op-ed on health reform last August.  But now that he's thinking of representing you and me in the US Senate, the least I can do to help him is to ask that he get his facts straight on the public option.

Sean Mahoney:

Of course, the reason the government plan will be allowed to offer lower premiums is that it will be subsidized by taxpayers.

Think about that. The more successful the government option is at "competing" with private insurers, the more burdensome it will be on hardworking taxpayers. I suppose we can take solace in the fact that most government programs fail utterly.
President Barack Obama:
Despite all this, the insurance companies and their allies don't like this idea.  They argue that these private companies can't fairly compete with the government.  And they'd be right if taxpayers were subsidizing this public insurance option.  But they won't be.  I've insisted that like any private insurance company, the public insurance option would have to be self-sufficient and rely on the premiums it collects. But by avoiding some of the overhead that gets eaten up at private companies by profits and excessive administrative costs and executive salaries, it could provide a good deal for consumers, and would also keep pressure on private insurers to keep their policies affordable and treat their customers better, the same way public colleges and universities provide additional choice and competition to students without in any way inhibiting a vibrant system of private colleges and universities.
Of course, since Mahoney is convinced the government programs "fail utterly," the President's apt comparison of the public option to public colleges makes me wonder about Mahoney's view of the University of New Hampshire.  But I digress.

In the end, of course, Mahoney's getting it wrong on the public option is still better than stealth candidate Kelly Ayotte, who, patiently waiting to be coronated the nominee, can't even say whether she's more like Olympia Snowe or Jim DeMint.

Dean Barker :: Sean Mahoney and the Public Option
Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Perhaps a translation is in order-- (0.00 / 0)
"government" (a foreign agency) "will be allowed" (violates the purpose of government--to rule)

"successful...at competing" (destroying)

"hardworking taxpayer" (persons obedient to the rule of law)

"programs fail" (don't make people behave)

"take solace" (we're right)

Government as an antagonist of the people because people are bad.  Conservatives are still stuck in the era of the selfish gene--a convenient paradigm for people who want an excuse to manipulate people instead of things.


Hang On (0.00 / 0)
I think I'm missing something and/or am confused.  Is the President saying that the government will charge premiums to everyone in the public option plan?  Why can't the government just tax the rich more to pay for the premiums of those who can't afford health insurance?

Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox