About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors


Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Betsy Devine
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce

Politicos & Punditry
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
John DeJoie
Ann McLane Kuster
ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Second Time's the Charm?

by: Dean Barker

Mon Oct 19, 2009 at 05:43:22 AM EDT


Governor John Lynch's veto of the medical marijuana bill, 10 July 2009, in part:
I understand and empathize with the advocates for allowing medical marijuana use in New Hampshire. However, the fact remains that marijuana use for any purpose remains illegal under federal law. Therefore, if we are to allow its use in New Hampshire for medical purposes, we must ensure that we are implementing the right policy.
Today:
The Obama administration will not seek to arrest medical marijuana users and suppliers as long as they conform to state laws, under new policy guidelines to be sent to federal prosecutors Monday.

Two Justice Department officials described the new policy to The Associated Press, saying prosecutors will be told it is not a good use of their time to arrest people who use or provide medical marijuana in strict compliance with state laws.

As I've said many times before, I'm a world class prude when it comes to illegal drugs.  But even I can see that this as a no-brainer.  And with the inclusion of New Hampshire on top of existing laws in Vermont and Maine, legislation allowing the seriously ill the ability to ease their pain would make northern New England's claim for leading the nation in common sense, progressive laws stronger still.
Dean Barker :: Second Time's the Charm?
Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Let me be helpful and suggest that what a person (0.00 / 0)
ingests, inhales, injects or, for that matter, excretes from one's own body represents the very essence of personal privacy and is not properly subject to social regulation--at least not if the right to privacy has any significance.  

The deprivation of liberty under color of law isn't a crime that's gotten a lot of coverage, in part because precedential cases have usually involved the right to property, rather than the right to personal integrity.  But, that's what the detention and assaults on the captives at Guantanamo amounted to and, now that the Supreme Court has established precedent and ruled that foreign persons have the same human rights as everyone else within the jurisdiction of the Constitution, deprivation of liberty under color of law is what those who authorized torture can be charged with.  And the record that some detainees were injected with legal drugs to "rescue" them from near death can be part of the charge.

Using or not using mind and life-altering substances is not an issue of prudery.  It's a basic human right that one needs to respect for oneself and everyone else.

Making and selling toxins, on the other hand, are behaviors that are properly subject to social control.


John Lynch Is Wrong On This One... (4.00 / 1)
...and the Obama Adminstration gets it.  

Here is what the primary sponsor of House Bill 648, Representative Evalyn Merrick of Lancaster, said in an E-Mail to Legislators yesterday:

"Everyone has been touched by physical and emotional suffering due to a chronic condition or disease, whether it be through a family member, a friend, a seat mate or yourself."

"Many of you know I am challenged with an incurable form of blood cancer.  The treatments I endured during a bone marrow transplant and related rounds of chemotherapy created side effects that prescribed pharmaceuticals couldn't mitigate.  I almost lost the fight due to malnutrition and dehydration until someone suggested cannabis.

"Only a small and limited amount was needed to jump start the engine.  As a result, I am able to help fight for those who may not be able to fight for themselves.  I ask you to put aside fear, inaccurate information, and preconceived notions.  Please don't discount the suffering of many of our constituents.  Twice the house passed this bill based on policy.  Twice the Senate passed it.  It is time to put policy aside and join the voices of those who voted on behalf of compassion."

It would be good if John Lynch were to change his request for a veto before next week.  But short of that, we should override.  It's smart policy to help people.  Always.  

And we should never make criminals of those residents who need help.  Never.  


I believe there are (4.00 / 4)
enough votes in the House to override. It passed the Senate 14-10, basically on party lines except Betsi DeVries voted nay and John Gallus voted yea. That means constituents need to convince two state senators to change their votes.

This is one case where I disagree with the Governor, especially in the light of the change in federal policy. The bill is also very tight. Representative Merrick and others worked very, very hard to address the Governor's concerns during the committee of conference process.

Rep. Merrick's strength, compassion and work ethic in the House are amazing. Her constituents are lucky to be represented by her and this entire state benefits from her service. Without that small assistance to keep her going when she needed it, she most likely wouldn't be here. That is really something to think about.


Dear Governor Lynch (0.00 / 0)
Your concern is duly noted.  

"What you need is sustained outrage...there's far too much unthinking respect given to authority." -- Molly Ivins  

Crucial (4.00 / 1)
If you know people in Manchester, it is extremely important that they contact their senators, particularly Betsi DeVries. She voted the wrong way before, but if enough constituents, not people from outside Manchester, contact her it may make the crucial difference.

Call your friends in Manchester, please ask them to call their senator.

Thanks, from a formerly seriously ill patient as defined under the bill (six awful months enduring Hep C treatment). So many have it so much worse.

No'm Sayn?


Thanks for posting this, Dean (0.00 / 0)
Couldn't have said it better myself.  

Executive Director, NH Coalition for Common Sense Marijuana Policy

Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox