New CD 1 Congressional candidate throws hat into...craigslist

Mr. Rondeau is anti-comma (4.00 / 1)

If you don't understand when to employ a comma to divide dependent and independent clauses then vote for me.

---

by: FrankLloydMike @ Mon Dec 21, 2009 at 12:11:57 PM CST

do you suppose (4.00 / 7)

he's a comma chameleon?  

member of the professional left  

---

by: susanthe @ Mon Dec 21, 2009 at 13:20:45 PM CST

[ Parent ]

He is a true anti-comma-nist! (4.00 / 3)

2012 starts today.

---

by: Ray Buckley @ Mon Dec 21, 2009 at 14:42:47 PM CST

[ Parent ]

This could make me... (4.00 / 1)

Comma-tose!



"When you get to the end of your rope, tie a knot and hang on."  Franklin D. Roosevelt    

---

by: Kathy Sullivan 2 @ Mon Dec 21, 2009 at 14:50:52 PM CST

[ Parent ]

You're right! (0.00 / 0)

From the link:

If you believe that the federal government is out to destroy the traditional family under color of newly created non-parent rights laws and that this is part of a communist agenda then vote for me.

birch, finch, beech

---

by: Dean Barker @ Mon Dec 21, 2009 at 15:58:22 PM CST

[ Parent ]

Why is Ray Buckley sitting on the sidelines? (0.00 / 0)

It seems odd that Ray Buckley will not comment on the investigation concerning Kelly Ayotte, which has been mentioned here many times and is now being posted on NHInsider.  (Discussion Board/2010 NH Elections/Ayotte) It's time Ray to stop sitting and start solving, or are you afraid to step on some Democratic toes?

---

by: davecoltin @ Mon Dec 21, 2009 at 21:43:38 PM CST

[ Parent ]

It has been mentioned here many times by YOU (4.00 / 1)

Mr. Coltin, this is diary hijacking.

Don't do it again, please.

---

by: elwood @ Mon Dec 21, 2009 at 21:50:04 PM CST

[ Parent ]

This is not diary hijacking (0.00 / 0)

A number of issues overlap. You would find this to be the case if you would show some initiative. What is significant in my case is that I convinced a federal judge to order an investigation of Kelly Ayotte. The dynamic is New Hampshire is not Republicans or Democrats; it is insiders and outsiders, and I am clearly an outsider, therefore this is not going to be addressed here unless I convince an insider like yourself to step up to the plate.  

---

by: davecoltin @ Mon Dec 21, 2009 at 22:14:25 PM CST

[ Parent ]

You have been warned n/t (0.00 / 0)

---

by: elwood @ Tue Dec 22, 2009 at 06:24:56 AM CST

[ Parent ]

seeing as how (0.00 / 0)

the topic isn't Ray Buckley, or Kelly Ayotte, this most certainly is diary hijacking, Mr. Coltin. It's also you bringing your NH Insider bullshit to Blue Hampshire. We aren't going to play forum war with you. We (at BH anyhow) aren't third graders playing king of the hill.

If you have issues with Ray Buckely, take them up with him. Blue Hampshire is not a forum run by Ray Buckley or the NHDP and it sure as hell isn't a front for them.  

member of the professional left  

---

by: susanthe @ Tue Dec 22, 2009 at 12:13:00 PM CST

[ Parent ]

Questions (4.00 / 2)

What is the "federal constitutionally guaranteed Parent-Child Liberty interest"?  And where is this section in the Constitution?  




"When you get to the end of your rope, tie a knot and hang on."  Franklin D. Roosevelt    

---

by: Kathy Sullivan 2 @ Mon Dec 21, 2009 at 14:16:13 PM CST

Don't you worry your pretty head about that (4.00 / 3)

now, Kathy. Your husband, the head of your GOD FEARING family can explain all this to you.  

member of the professional left  

---

by: susanthe @ Mon Dec 21, 2009 at 15:06:04 PM CST

[ Parent ]

Thanks! (4.00 / 3)

Although he may look at me like I have lost my mind!



"When you get to the end of your rope, tie a knot and hang on."  Franklin D. Roosevelt    

---

by: Kathy Sullivan 2 @ Mon Dec 21, 2009 at 15:12:31 PM CST

[ Parent ]

linked without comment (0.00 / 0)

http://www.fathersunite.org/Co...

---

by: kite @ Mon Dec 21, 2009 at 15:14:14 PM CST

[ Parent ]

Do you think he would like to join my posse comma-atus? n/t (4.00 / 4)

---

by: hannah @ Mon Dec 21, 2009 at 15:18:29 PM CST

Nope. (0.00 / 0)

non potest usurpare caesa.

--
@DougLindner

---

by: Douglas E. Lindner @ Mon Dec 21, 2009 at 16:22:11 PM CST

[ Parent ]

Where have I heard this before? (0.00 / 0)

I hereby object to the funding of the deployment of additional troops in Afghanistan using the People's money. My objection is based as follows:

History and military strategy both show us that the Afghanistan War can not be successfully fought regardless of the outcome. There are no winners in war.

In this case, the People of the United States have already footed the bill for the United States Military for eight yours in the sum of hundreds of billions of dollars. Despite the outrageous financial burden unreasonably imposed on the People of the United States during these trying economic times, the military has been unable to secure Afghanistan and to capture the alleged terrorists allegedly responsible for 911. Given the massive amounts of dollars spent on this war thus far, the present status is completely unacceptable. It is self evident at this point that the We the People of the United States have been fraudulently swindled out of ridiculously enormous amounts of our monies by a misguided military that is obviously bent on the abrogation of personal liberties both here in the United States and abroad. Further, the Congress has failed to conduct adequate hearings on the 911 incident and to provide convincing evidence to the People of the United States to justify its Declaration of War on alleged terrorists that allegedly outwitted the United States Department of Defense, et al., to justify the outrageous financial appropriations of the People's money for this facade, and to justify further deployment of additional troops to Afghanistan.

The Obama Administration and the Congress have forgotten and/or maliciously disregarded the reason why the Democrats won the Presidency and the Congress back from the Liberal Republicans the last elections. The Democrats, including now President Obama, promised the People of the United States an end to the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, diplomatic diplomacy, rebuilding our infrastructure, putting the People of the United States back to work, implementing higher standards of governance, providing greater transparency in the federal government, providing justice for all people, promoting better quality of life for the poor and middle class (including providing quality health care for the poor), et al. These promises have not been honored by the Obama Administration and the Congress as of this time. This is completely unacceptable to the People of the United States and will not go un-noticed during the next local, state and federal elections.

Whack-a-mole, anyone?

---

by: Jack Mitchell @ Mon Dec 21, 2009 at 16:40:39 PM CST