Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives
Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch
Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
John Lynch
Jennifer Daler
ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC
National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo
50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
One of the most annoying things in political life is the failure of candidates or committees to follow the most simple legal requirements, especially New Hampshire's legal requirments, because our requirements are so pathetically few. Violating our state's campaign laws should result in stiffer penalties than we have, because you either have to be stupid or just plain don't give a hoot about following them in order to violate the laws. It is especially annoying when candidates who are LAWYERS don't follow the law.
Here is one law, RSA 664:14. "All political advertising shall be signed at the beginning or the end with the names and addresses of the candidate, his fiscal agent, or the name and address of the chairman or the teasurer of a political committee, or the name and address of a natural person, according to whether a candidate, political committee, or natural person is responsible for it."
It does not get much simpler than that: candidate's name, address, fiscal agent. How hard is it to get that right?
No address, no fiscal agent. Just the name of the committee. He only was able to get one out the three right. Dude, this isn't rocket science. It isn't even advanced algebra.
Now, lest you think that there can be some doubt as to the applicability of the statute to his web site, RSA 664;2 defines political advertising as any "communication"; it defines "communication" as including, inter alia, "any Internet site".
Now, there may be those who think this is a trivail matter. By the time most of you get to his site, they probably will have fixed it, the way Ovide fixed the little problem of Mount Washington being in my backyard when his web site first went up. But it goes to seriousness of purpose. If you are a serious candidate for governor, who happens to be a LAWYER, then follow the rules. If you can't get something as simple as getting the disclosures right, then hit the bricks.
To be fair to Johnny, I looked at each page on his web site, as even I would cut him some slack if the fiscal agent and name were listed somewhere, anywhere, at his site. They aren't.