Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives
Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch
Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
John Lynch
Jennifer Daler
ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC
National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo
50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
The Nation's Ari Melber has an article outlining a new study done by researchers at Harvard, Yale, and Berkeley. Titled A Tale of Two Blogospheres: Discursive Practices on the Left and Right, the study finds, among other things, that liberal blogs tend to use platforms that allow multiple authors to be featured, while conservative ones allow for one main writer and online newspaper style comments at the bottom, if that.
The dominant academic literature posits an ideologically symmetrical blogosphere--an arena where liberals and conservatives practice similar writing, linking and mobilization tactics. The political and media establishment, meanwhile, tend to treat blogs as an isolated medium for political polarization. In this narrative, blogs are a digital refuge for the radical pacifists and tea party insurgents stuck at the margins of their own parties.
The study's findings challenge these hypotheses.
A pre-publication copy of the study was obtained by Melber. It was conducted by researchers Yochai Benkler, Aaron Shaw and Victoria Stodden. They looked at the content and technology of 150 political blogs over two weeks during the 2008 presidential election.
One of the most striking findings is structural: liberal blogs provide audience participation options at triple the rate of conservative sites. That means visitors to progressive sites are more empowered to contribute entire posts to the "front page," and more likely to have their contributions or comments highlighted before potentially hundreds of thousands of readers
Aaron Shaw, who co-wrote the study as part of his Phd in Sociology at Berkely, told Melber that the public sphere in America will change drastically over the next two decades if this format catches on. This, of course, is right out of Markos Moulitas Zuniga's book Taking on the System, a book I recommend, if only for its description of Carol Shea-Porter's successful 2006 Congressional campaign.
But
"The right adopts practices that more strictly separate secondary from primary content," the study reports. In other words, many conservatives still run their sites like newspapers. The writers are credentialed on stage, while "letters to the editor" are clearly marked and parked in the back. Overall, 42 percent of the conservative blogs in the survey were run by one author, while 20 percent of the liberal sites were solo shows.
The article goes on to reiterate that the political ramifications of each side's use of the blogosphere are huge. We already knew this, but it is interesting to see it borne out via the study.
The article and the study it's based on are well worth the read. Political types, from policy wonks to organizers, ignore the power of the blogoshere at their own peril.
