About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors


Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe
William Tucker

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Still No Going Back
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
John Lynch
Jennifer Daler

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Katrina Swett supports marriage equality

by: brianrater

Sat Jul 17, 2010 at 12:34:38 PM EDT


Katrina Swett Statement on Marriage Equality

I am a proud supporter of marriage equality.  As it often does, NH led the country by being the first in the nation to proactively enact marriage equality through the legislative process.   In so doing, NH stood up for the proposition that all members of our community should be treated with respect and deserve an equal place at the table.

I strongly support the repeal of DOMA as well the repeal of DADT.  While the repeal of DOMA would bring important concrete federal benefits to couples who live in states that have marriage equality, it would confer no benefits on same sex couples living in the 45 states that do not.  That is why I will lead the fight for federal civil union legislation that would extend the full range of federal benefits and legal protections to all families in our country.

http://www.swettforcongress.co...

brianrater :: Katrina Swett supports marriage equality
Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Yes, but does Ms. Swett support human equality? (0.00 / 0)
It's easy to support something that isn't and can't be.  Just as no two people are equal, their partnerships can't be equal either.

The issue is whether or not each person within the jurisdiction of the Constitution of the U.S. is treated equally by our agents of government. There is no evidence, in the statement, of the candidate's intent to insure this effect.

Marriages are private contracts.  Because society recognizes that there are associated social benefits, which flow from such a permanent commitment and that the knowledge of who's made a commitment is useful, entering such information into the public record is considered a positive and worth being prompted with the promise of rewards (special benefits).

Equality is not a desert.  It is a given.  Marriages, moreover, exist whether or not they are officially recognized, religiously sanctified or rewarded with special benefits.  If that's a difficult concept, compare it to the historical reality that humans are born, regardless of whether their birth is officially recorded or recognized as legitimate.  Illegitimate children were historically subject to a lower social status, much as illegal immigrants are attempted to be subject now.

It would, btw, be equal treatment to remove all consideration of marital status from employment compensation rate determinations.  Just as it was equal treatment to shutter all public swimming pools in the South and to privatize all public medical facilities, so the only criterion for access to service could be monetary assets or a third-party guarantee (insurance).  Equality doesn't necessarily apply to benefits; people can be equally deprived -- of their property and their human rights.

Rights, it turns out, are pretty useless, if they aren't associated with concomitant obligations.  How strong is Ms. Swett's support for social obligations?  If, as she asserts, rights are a matter of deserts, then the commitment to deliver on societal obligations should be automatically suspect.



Connect with BH
     
Blue Hampshire Blog on Facebook
Powered by: SoapBlox