Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives
Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch
Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
John Lynch
Jennifer Daler
ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC
National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo
50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
OK, this is getting bizarre. First, under pressure, former Attorney General Kelly Ayotte has her "legally deleted" email released to show that there's nothing from her on the FRM ponzi scheme. Which in itself is not exactly a vote of confidence on her behalf.
Now, we learn there's nothing there either from the JUA case (Laconia Daily Sun, available here by then clicking on "Find a Past Issue", under the 2010 file name "30L.pdf"):
CONCORD - Kelly Ayotte, a leading Republican candidate for United States Senate, apparently cannot outrun her role as Attorney General in the decision of Governor John Lynch's Administration to pursue the $110-million surplus of the New Hampshire Medical Malpractice Joint Underwriting Association (JUA).
When Ayotte was Attorney General her office provided the governor with a legal opinion that the state was entitled to the surplus funds. On the strength of the opinion, the $110-million was included in the2010-2011 state budget. Policyholders of the JUA challenged the state's claim to the money and prevailed, first in Belknap County Superior Court and then at the New Hampshire Supreme Court.
Soon after Ayotte announced for the Senate, questions about her role in providing legal opinion dogged her campaign. And yesterday, attorneys representing the policyholders of JUA questioned why not one of the thousands of Ayotte's e-mails disclosed to the public refers to her department's representation of the JUA before the courts, which was a bone of contention during the litigation.
As I remember at the time, and as the article notes, Governor Lynch said Ayotte "was very involved in all of these discussions."
