Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives
Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch
Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
John Lynch
Jennifer Daler
ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC
National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo
50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
(Plans from the Nanny Party - promoted by Mike Hoefer)
The New Hamsphire House Republican Alliance releasing their legislative priorities. The first priority mentioned was repealing marriage equality. This was a little ironic in that they claimed that their proposals "will restore prosperity, re-establish New Hampshire as a state that attracts newcomers and encourages its citizens to live their lives without government interference."
Wrong. Telling us who we can marry on the basis of preference is most certainly interference by the government. As for prosperity, marriage equality is good for business - in Connecticut, for example, it is estimated that an additional $40,000,000 has been brought into the state due to the passage of marriage equality over the last two years.
They also want to force you to produce photo i.d. in order to vote. This is the first step toward requiring citizens to carry government approved papers all the time, which is very anti-liberty, anti-personal freedom. Free, law abiding citizens should not be forced to produce identification in order to exercise our constitutional right to vote.
These alleged defenders of liberty actually do not believe in liberty, or personal freedoms, or freedom from government interference. Democrats need to take back the mantle as defenders of the core values of the American Revolution, equality and liberty, because these folks are poseurs. With a capital POSE. They hide their efforts behind faux history, bad science and fear. They would end equal opportunity by eviscerating public education (jeapordizing national security and prosperity). They would turn back the clock on our constitutional form of government and back to the days of the Articles of Confederation.
More (Dean): Here's the link to the UL article.